Issue50 【challenge yourself小组】第二次作业

sabrinabaobaoUID：2515866

Issue50 【challenge yourself小组】第二次作业 by sabrinabaobao
平衡观点
有些学科的教授不适合在去校外工作。如果去校外工作的话会分散精力不能集中于科研工作，影响学校教学质量。
有些学科的教授应当去校外工作。社会经历有助于在专业上的提高， 利于给与学生在知识和职业规划方面的指导

Whether the faculty should spend time working outside the academic world in the professions relevant to their courses is controversial, which involves debate between people with distinct angles. In my point of view, it is correct that faculty applying their academic knowledge in the society will somehow improve the quality of instruction in college or university; we still need take consideration in the different conditions. In order to draw conclusion, the case to case analyses are necessary.

On one hand, to the faculty members of some certain subjects, working outside the academia will not help with their academic ability; moreover, will bring negative effect to their research and instruction. To illustrate the point evidently, let us look at the example of the professors major in philosophy. First, there are no appropriate jobs outside the academic area related to philosophy and metaphysics for the philosophy professors to apply their episteme. They specialize in studying in examining the nature of reality, the relation between idea and image, experience and truth, existentialism and skepticism. Conducting concrete jobs in society has nothing to do with the philosophic professors’ academic ability; contrarily working outside the academia consequentially distracts them from the research and studying. For doing social work will occupy professors’ time, energy and mind, which would be used for reading the classical masterpieces or devoted into the theorization. In the end, working outside the campus will degrade the scholarship of the professors. What is worse, the quality of instruction will decline for the same reasons. Hence it is no worthwhile that the professors of some academic areas, especially those deserve extremely efforts and concentration, try to find work outside the academia.

On the other hand, apart from those professors limited by the nature of the subjects they are studying at, I approve that the professors combine their academic knowledge and the practical work in the professional positions in the society. The faculty in the academic areas, such as business administration, construction and engineering, should work in the real world, for there are some benefits to do so. On one sense, theorization from the realistic experience is an outstanding nature of these fields. The professors can emulate the latest perceive and direct cases for their academic study and teaching. The students will be inspired by the real examples and benefit a lot from the professors’ instruction. On the other sense, catching up with the newest information in these fields, the professors can provide the students with potential foreground and the accurate suggestions about future career in the relevant career. Their own experience and direction will help students make wise decisions after graduation.

To sum up, after comparing the advantages and disadvantages of faculty working outside the academic area, we can draw the conclusion that for there is no need for the professors in some fields to work in the society, for whom the social works are unavailable and ineffectual; while other faculty in the subjects of practicability can enrich their academic ability in the real world.

linyunfUID：2405027

Whether the faculty should spend time working outside the academic world in the professions relevant to their courses is controversial, which involves debate between people with distinct angles. In my point of view, it is correct that faculty applying their academic knowledge in the society will somehow improve the quality of instruction in college or university; we still need take consideration in the（不要the）different conditions. In order to draw conclusion, the case to case analyses are necessary.

On one hand, to the faculty members of some certain subjects, working outside the academia will not help with their academic ability; moreover, will bring negative effect to their research and instruction. To illustrate the point evidently, let us look at the example of the professors major in philosophy. First, there are no appropriate jobs outside the academic area related to philosophy and metaphysics for the philosophy professors to apply their episteme. They specialize in studying in examining the nature of reality, the relation between idea and image, experience and truth, existentialism and skepticism. Conducting concrete jobs in society has nothing to do with the philosophic professors’ academic ability; contrarily working outside the academia consequentially distracts them from the research and studying. For doing social work will occupy professors’ time, energy and mind, which would be used for reading the classical masterpieces or devoted into the theorization. In the end, working outside the campus will degrade the scholarship of the professors. What is worse, the quality of instruction will decline for the same reasons. Hence it is no worthwhile （worthwhile是形容词吧？）some academic areas, especially those deserve extremely efforts and concentration, try to find work outside the academia.

On the other hand, apart from those professors limited by the nature of the subjects they are studying at, I approve that the professors combine their academic knowledge and the practical work in the professional positions in the society. The faculty in the academic areas, such as business administration, construction and engineering, should work in the real world, for there are some benefits to do so. On one sense, theorization from the realistic experience is an outstanding nature of these fields. The professors can emulate the latest perceive and direct cases for their academic study and teaching. The students will be inspired by the real examples and benefit a lot from the professors’ instruction. On the other sense（有这样用得么？）, catching up with the newest information in these fields, the professors can provide the students with potential foreground and the accurate suggestions about future career in the relevant career. Their own experience and direction will help students make wise decisions after graduation.

To sum up, after comparing the advantages and disadvantages of faculty working outside the academic area, we can draw the conclusion that for （不要for）there is no need for the professors in some fields to work in the society, for whom the social works are unavailable and ineffectual; while other faculty in the subjects of practicability(实用学科是这样说的么？我不知道诶) can enrich their academic ability（复数） in the real world.

很好很好
小错误应该阻止不了你拿高分的。不过有几个用法，我不知道对不对。我没见过，所以指出来，如果真有这样用，那就麻烦回下贴，多谢。

[ 本帖最后由 linyunf 于 2008-7-27 23:58 编辑 ]

springelfUID：2458536

word :501

Whether the faculty should spend time working outside the academic world in the professions relevant to their courses is controversial, which involves debate between people with distinct angles. （which后面这句是什么意思啊？请教一下。） In my point of view, it is correct that faculty applying their academic knowledge in the society will somehow improve the quality of instruction in college or university;(这句好像有点问题，我不是太明白为什么这些教员将专业知识应用于社会就能提高学校的教学水平啊?是不是我们对于the quality of instruction的理解有偏差呢？) we still need take consideration in the different conditions. In order to draw conclusion, the case to case analyses are necessary.

On one hand, to the faculty members of some certain subjects, working outside the academia will not help with their academic ability; moreover, will bring negative effect to their research and instruction. To illustrate the point evidently, let us look at the example of the professors major in philosophy. (两句重复了，要后面一句就好了)First, there are no appropriate jobs outside the academic area related to philosophy and metaphysics for the philosophy professors to apply their episteme. They specialize in studying in examining the nature of reality, the relation between idea and image, experience and truth, existentialism and skepticism. Conducting concrete jobs in society has nothing to do with the philosophic professors’ academic ability; contrarily working outside the academia consequentially distracts them from the research and studying.(从first开始到这里说的有点啰嗦，不过也行，这也是一种办法。嗯，在考场上的时候这种办法是可取的。在练习的时候我们还是提高点要求，尽量不这么翻来覆去的说一件事情哈~不过，好像我的文章也是这样呢！嗯，我也要提高要求！！:rolleyes: ) For doing social work will occupy professors’ time, energy and mind, which would be used for reading the classical masterpieces or devoted into the theorization. In the end, working outside the campus will degrade the scholarship of the professors. What is worse, the quality of instruction will decline for the same reasons. Hence it is no worthwhile that the professors of some academic areas, especially those deserve extremely efforts and concentration, try to find work outside the academia.(我从看到First开始就在寻找Second，in addition之类的词，看到结束我才知道我被欺骗了~~~:funk: 不能这样哈，ETS的衰人会认为你结构不完整的。那个First宁愿不要。:) )

On the other hand, apart from those professors limited by the nature of the subjects they are studying at, I approve that the professors combine their academic knowledge and the practical work in the professional positions in the society. The faculty in the academic areas, such as business administration, construction and engineering, should work in the real world, for there are some benefits to do so. On one sense, theorization from the realistic experience is an outstanding nature of these fields. The professors can emulate the latest perceive and direct cases for their academic study and teaching. The students will be inspired by the real examples and benefit a lot from the professors’ instruction. On the other sense, catching up with the newest information in these fields, the professors can provide the students with potential foreground and the accurate suggestions about future career in the relevant career. Their own experience and direction will help students make wise decisions after graduation.

To sum up, after comparing the advantages and disadvantages of faculty working outside the academic area, we can draw the conclusion that for there is no need for the professors in some fields to work in the society, for whom the social works are unavailable and ineffectual; while other faculty in the subjects of practicability can enrich their academic ability in the real world.

(总的来说sabirna已经掌握了写issue的方法了。文章的结构很好，脉络也很清晰。我有2个建议：1是在逻辑方面，我觉得你还需要强化一些。写提纲的时候写的稍微细一点，然后写反对意见的时候尽量写的细一点。比如你说有的领域不用花费时间做学术外的工作你就可以说①这些纯理论的东西本来就不需要②如果把时间花在这个上面就会占用教员的时间精力③然后他们自己研究就会被耽误④学生的学习也会被耽误⑤学校的教育水平就下降了，于是适得其反。我能感到你想这么说，但是就是觉得不是很清楚。2.在语言方面。总体感觉是中文的语感太强了。其实我自己也有这个问题。我现在在背一些东西，然后用别人的东西来套我的例子，我觉得会好一些。你可以试试。嗯，字数还可以多点。总体来说写的不错了。:loveliness: )

sabrinabaobaoUID：2515866

On the other sense
the subjects of practicability 可以这样用的，你对我的文章太客气了， 离高分还是很远的，谢谢评改

sabrinabaobaoUID：2515866

which involves debate between people with distinct angles是想说：不同人从不同角度看问题得出不同结论引起了争论， 从别人的模板里抄的，生搬硬套了:funk:
下次肯定要注意first 的用法了，谢谢楼主指点。
一般被什么文章比较好呢？我担心背了之后会容易判雷同:confused:

springelfUID：2458536

嗯，那个句子是我阅读能力有问题，嘿嘿，你说了以后我懂了~~:loveliness:

文章啊，我看看新概念3、4 的一些文章，北美也行，不要原搬，用他的语言改你自己的例子，这样会比较原汁原味一点。

还有，你都几点睡觉啊？:vomit: 要早点休息啊~~~:)

linyunfUID：2405027

确实啊，4点还在线。比我还猛啊。