argument44超越自我小组第五次作业

zugurrrUID: 2482827

44The following is a recommendation from the business manager of Monarch Books.

"Monarch Books should open a café in its store to attract more customers and better compete with Regal Books, which recently opened a café. Monarch, which has been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer following because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Opening the café would clearly attract more customers. The café would require relatively little space. Space could be made for the café by discontinuing the children's book section, which will likely become less popular given that the last national census indicated a significant decline in the percent of the population who are under age ten."

The arguer in the statement concludes that Monarch Books should open a cafe insider. To support it, he gives the comparison of Regal Books. Meanwhile, the arguer provides the evidences that the building of cafe could attract more customers, and use space more profitable. However, through the argument the conclusion is unwarranted and misleading.

First, if the customers of Monarch Books don't need any service from the cafe, opening a cafe should be wasting money and time. The arguer provide no information about whether there need to be a cafe. Maybe the customers of Monarch Books are mostly come to buy or borrow books, they have no needs to stay Monarch for the service of cafe. Or the condition of Monarch is not suitable for cafe maybe because of noise. Unless the arguer provides the evidence that the customers of Monarch need this service and opening a cafe could create profits, it is too early to get the conclusion.

Second, the analog of the Regal Books is unwarranted. If the Regal Books cafe just suffers being unprofitable, the new cafe for Monarch is unworthy. Or maybe given the profits from the Regal Books cafe, the arguer fails to compare the same market conditions or the similar local demands between the two book businesses. There is the possibility that Regal Books sited near an park where many travelers cater for the cafe business. Without evidence of profits along with the cafe, it is misleading of the comparison.

Third, given the open of cafe could earn money, If the local needs of the children's book significantly increase, rather than the national tendency of decline, that may be unwise to discount the children' book section. The general currency of children's book doesn't necessary mean the decrease of the local needs where Monarch Books serves. And the census only concerns about the children fewer than ten age, so what about the children above ten years old. Maybe increase of their books would sell much more than the decrease of the under ten years old children's book. Therefore, before the arguer gives the evidence of the children's book section is beyond its space for its book need, the suggestion is premature.

In sum, without the detail information of the comparison of Regal Books, the worthiness of the cafe is doubted. To strengthen the argument, the arguer should provider the evidence that there are needs and potential market for the cafe in Monchar, and to make sure the local needs of the children's books in Monchar will decrease in future.

vryUID: 2288609

The arguer in the statement concludes that Monarch Books should open a cafe insider. To support it, he gives the comparison of Regal Books. Meanwhile, the arguer provides the evidences that the building of cafe could attract more customers, and use space more profitable. However, through the argument the conclusion is unwarranted and misleading.

First, if the customers of Monarch Books don't need any service from the cafe, opening a cafe should be wasting money and time. The arguer provide （provides）no information about whether there need to be a cafe. Maybe the customers of Monarch Books are mostly come to buy or borrow books, they have no needs to stay Monarch for the service of cafe. Or the condition of Monarch is not suitable for cafe maybe because of noise. Unless the arguer provides the evidence that the customers of Monarch need this service and opening a cafe could create profits, it is too early to get the conclusion.

Second, the analog of the Regal Books is unwarranted. If the Regal Books cafe just suffers being unprofitable, the new cafe for Monarch is unworthy. Or maybe given the profits from the Regal Books cafe, the arguer fails to compare the same market conditions or the similar local demands between the two book businesses. There is the possibility that Regal Books sited near an park where many travelers cater for the cafe business. Without evidence of profits along with the cafe, it is misleading of the comparison.

Third, given the open of cafe could earn money, If the local needs of the children's book significantly increase, rather than the national tendency of decline, that may be unwise to discount the children' book section. The general currency of children's book doesn't necessary mean the decrease of the local needs where Monarch Books serves. And the census only concerns about the children fewer than ten age, so what about the children above ten years old. Maybe increase of their books would sell much more than the decrease of the under ten years old children's book. Therefore, before the arguer gives the evidence of the children's book section is beyond its space for its book need,（这个表达是不是有问题？） the suggestion is premature.

In sum, without the detail information of the comparison of Regal Books, the worthiness of the cafe is doubted. To strengthen the argument, the arguer should provider（provide） the evidence that there are needs and potential market for the cafe in Monchar, and to make sure the local needs of the children's books in Monchar will decrease in future.

整体感觉好啊~~~继续加油