【12月-1月IBT综合备考大帖】之【TWE作文】12.14号作业

kaoladedashuUID: 2403207

It is true that studying history benefits students a lot, such as broadening their views, enrich their minds. However, this is not practical for the university students whose main task is majoring in a certain field. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the statement that students should take the history courses no matter what majors they are in university.
First of all, history is a compulsory subject for students when they were in high school. In terms of the knowledge of national history and world history, which is essential for every educated person, what they learned in high school are sufficient unless someone choose to study in field immediately related to history, like literature, archaeology, politics, and so on. Hence, if the students whose major irrelevant to history continued to study these history courses in university, it is simple a meaningless repetition.
What’s more, every course, certainly including history course, offered in university requires students to pay much time and energy. In addition to attending the class, they also need to read more or less amount of reference materials, accomplishing assigned reports, preparing for and taking the exam. While for the non-history majors, the time and energy they allocated to history courses are bound to exploit those they should spend on their major. The limitation of human’s time and energy determines that one should only focus on one or some certain field. The more efforts you exert on, the more professional you will be. So, university students are supposed to concentrate fully on their major so as to turn out to be experts in which field they are pursuing.
Finally, imagine that all the students in university are taking history courses, which must result in that the university enlarges the department of history. Basically, they need to employ more history teachers to cater to the need. If this was the case, it is an irrational disposal for a portion of university, especially for the engineering university, which should invest relatively more educational resources in science subjects instead of art subjects like history. Form this point of view, requiring all the students to take history course would lead to a kind of waste of educational resources in university.
In conclusion, it is unadvisable that all university students take the history course. On the one hand, except for the history major, it will go against the self-development of students. On the other hand, it will bring negative effects on university education. Thus, history should be offered for the history major and the students who are interested in it.

[ 本帖最后由 kaoladedashu 于 2008-12-14 20:50 编辑 ]

泡面UID: 2513568

It is true that studying history benefits students a lot, such as broadening their views, enrich their minds. However, this is not practical for the university students whose main task is majoring in a certain field. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the statement that students should take the history courses no matter what majors they are in university.
First of all, history is a compulsory subject for students when they were in high school. In terms of the knowledge of national history and world history, which is essential for every educated person, what they learned in high school are sufficient unless someone choose to study in field immediately related to history, like literature, archaeology, politics, and so on. (词句中间最好断下句…）Hence, if the students whose major irrelevant to history continued to study these history courses in university, it is simple a meaningless repetition.

What's more, every course, certainly including history course, offered in university requires students to pay much time and energy. In addition to attending the class, they also need to read more or less amount of reference materials, accomplishing assigned reports, preparing for and taking the exam. While for the non-history majors, the time and energy they allocated to history courses are bound to exploit those they should spend on their major. The limitation of human’s time and energy determines that one should only focus on one or some certain field. The more efforts you exert on, the more professional you will be. So, university students are supposed to concentrate fully on their major so as to turn out to be experts in which field they are pursuing.

Finally, imagine that all the students in university are taking history courses, which must result in that the university enlarges the department of history. Basically, they need to employ more history teachers to cater to the need. If this was the case, it is an irrational disposal for a portion of university, especially for the engineering university, which should invest relatively more educational resources in science subjects instead of art subjects like history. Form (From) this point of view, requiring all the students to take history course would lead to a kind of waste of educational resources in university.

In conclusion, it is unadvisable that all university students take the history course. On the one hand, except for the history major, it will go against the self-development of students. On the other hand, it will bring negative effects on university education. Thus, history should be offered for the history major and the students who are interested in it.

简直太值得我学习了，基本没什么错误，一点建议最好每段的前面把这段的论点先概括一下再展开。

xiaojing1115UID: 2578357

It is true that studying history benefits students a lot, such as broadening(这个词用的很到位:loveliness: ) their views, enrich their minds. However, this is not practical for the university students whose main task is majoring in a certain field. Therefore, I tend to disagree with the statement that students should take the history courses no matter what majors they are in university.

First of all, history is a compulsory subject for students when they were in high school. In terms of the knowledge of national history and world history, which is essential for every educated person,（这里用句号吧，What重新起一句） what they learned in high school are sufficient unless someone choose to study in field immediately related to history, like literature, archaeology, politics, and so on. Hence, if the students whose major irrelevant to history continued to study these history courses in university, it is simple a meaningless repetition。

What’s more, every course, certainly including history course, offered in university requires students to pay much time and energy. In addition to attending the class, they also need to read more or less amount of reference materials, accomplishing assigned reports, preparing for and taking the exam. While for the non-history majors, the time and energy they allocated to history courses are bound to exploit those they should spend on their major. The limitation of human’s time and energy determines that one should only focus on one or some certain field. The more efforts you exert on, the more professional you will be. So, university students are supposed to concentrate fully on their major so as to turn out to be experts in which field they are pursuing.（这个观点很好哦）

Finally, imagine that all the students in university are taking history courses, which must result in that the university enlarges the department of history. Basically, they need to employ more history teachers to cater to the need. If this was the case, it is an irrational disposal for a portion of university, especially for the engineering university, which should invest relatively more educational resources in science subjects instead of art subjects like history. Form （from）this point of view, requiring all the students to take history course would lead to a kind of waste of educational resources in university.我觉得这段可以从教学设备上讲，就说聘用老师的钱可以用来买设备

In conclusion, it is unadvisable that all university students take the history course. On the one hand, except for the history major, it will go against the self-development of students. On the other hand, it will bring negative effects on university education. Thus, history should be offered for the history major and the students who are interested in it.

[ 本帖最后由 xiaojing1115 于 2008-12-15 11:59 编辑 ]

nickey0809UID: 2349468

第三个论点较新，看了一圈下来
第二各论点其实就是meaningless repetition另一种方式的表诉，一二观点合成一段组织一下再分成三个层次说可能会比较好
语言较干练，值得学习
共同努力吧