argument179 限时。互拍。指教。

果小冻UID: 208370

ARGUMENT 179
- The following is a memorandum written by the director of personnel to the president of the Cedar Corporation.

"It would be a mistake to rehire the Good-Taste Company to supply the food in our employee cafeteria next year. It is the second most expensive caterer in the city. In addition, its prices have risen in each of the last three years, and it refuses to provide meals for people on special diets. Just last month three employees complained to me that they no longer eat in the cafeteria because they find the experience 'unbearable.' Our company should instead hire Discount Foods. Discount is a family-owned local company and it offers a varied menu of fish and poultry. I recently tasted a sample lunch at one of the many companies that Discount serves and it was delicious-an indication that hiring Discount will lead to improved employee satisfaction."
WORDS：490          TIME：0:30:00          DATE：2006-2-5
提纲：
1关于价钱。首先高价也许是由于特别好的服务。其次没有提供关于D的价钱问题
2没有充分证据说明G 的服务不好。首先三个人的意见不能说明问题。其次上个月的情况是不够的。
3D不一定好，首先员工的口味信息要提供。其次，作者一个人的意见没有办法说明问题。再次要得到满意，还有很多因素。

Criticizing the high price and dissatisfaction of three employees of the Good-Taste Company, providing the personal experience of tasting in Discount , the author suggests that the corporation should hire the latter for supplying food. However, since the evidence is insufficient and the comparison is not scientific enough, the suggestion is completely open to doubt.

To begin with, even the prices of Good-Taste Company really higher than the others, it does not mean that it should not be rehired. It is entirely possible that the higher prices are caused by especially outstanding services. The author should provide information about the market position of this company, since the opinions of customers are the most credible judgments. Perhaps, their ever rising prices are resulted by their improving quality and better reflection of customers. In addition, the author fails to offer any information about the prices of the Discount serves. Maybe their prices are also very high, or even higher than those of Good-Taste Company. Without carefully analyzing and comparison, the author should no criticize the high prices of the Good-Taste Company.

Furthermore, the author should not depend too much on the complaints of just three employees. Their opinions are not representative enough to be treated as the evidence for bad services of Good-Taste Company. The author should give more views of the majority of employees. Maybe the three persons are just those who have special demands on diets, and their complaints are just caused by their personal reasons, while having nothing to do with the overall appearance of the company. Also, the author should not evaluate the service of the company just relying on the situation of last month. In short, the author needs to provide us more information about the evaluations of the everyday services of Good-Taste Company, which offered by more people.

Moreover, the author should not unwarrantedly conclude that the Discount surly serves better than other companies. The author fails to conduct a survey, which reveal the preference of the employees towards the food. It is entirely possible that most of them have no interests in fish and poultry. Then just providing the personal experience of tasting in Discount, the author cannot conclude that food offered by this company is delicious. To bolster his conclusion, the author needs to invite more people to have a try. Then, even if the food is really delicious, it does not follows that Discount will lead to improved employee satisfaction. Since more factors should be considered, such as outstanding services, good prestige, and the quality of food. Thus, the author needs to provide more detailed information about Discount besides his or her own evaluation.

In sum, before giving suggestion, the author should provide more representative and comprehensive information of both the Good-Taste Company and Discount, including food tasting, services, and quality of food. What's more, the author should carefully acknowledge the preference of employees of Cedar Corporation, in order to pursue more satisfactions.

果小冻UID: 208370

大家看看嘛。。。呵呵。指教一下哇

我的马甲UID: 2177806

ARGUMENT 179
- The following is a memorandum written by the director of personnel to the president of the Cedar Corporation.

"It would be a mistake to rehire the Good-Taste Company to supply the food in our employee cafeteria next year. It is the second most expensive caterer in the city. In addition, its prices have risen in each of the last three years, and it refuses to provide meals for people on special diets. Just last month three employees complained to me that they no longer eat in the cafeteria because they find the experience 'unbearable.' Our company should instead hire Discount Foods. Discount is a family-owned local company and it offers a varied menu of fish and poultry. I recently tasted a sample lunch at one of the many companies that Discount serves and it was delicious-an indication that hiring Discount will lead to improved employee satisfaction."
这题放眼一看，怎么感觉到处都是错误啊。
WORDS：490          TIME：0:30:00          DATE：2006-2-5
提纲：
1关于价钱。首先高价也许是由于特别好的服务。其次没有提供关于D的价钱问题
2没有充分证据说明G 的服务不好。首先三个人的意见不能说明问题。其次上个月的情况是不够的。
3D不一定好，首先员工的口味信息要提供。其次，作者一个人的意见没有办法说明问题。再次要得到满意，还有很多因素。

Criticizing the high price and dissatisfaction of three employees of the Good-Taste Company, providing the personal experience of tasting in Discount , the author suggests that the corporation should hire the latter for supplying food. However, since the evidence is insufficient and the comparison is not scientific enough, the suggestion is completely open to doubt.

To begin with, even the prices of Good-Taste Company really higher than the others, it does not mean that it should not be rehired. It is entirely possible that the higher prices are caused by especially outstanding services. The author should provide information about the market position of this company, since the opinions of customers are the most credible judgments. Perhaps, their ever rising prices are resulted by their improving quality and better reflection of customers. In addition, the author fails to offer any information about the prices of the Discount serves. Maybe their prices are also very high, or even higher than those of Good-Taste Company. Without carefully analyzing analysisand comparison, the author should no criticize the high prices of the Good-Taste Company.很清楚，和我的想法差不多。

Furthermore, the author should not depend too much on the complaints of just three employees. 没有把1个月短概括进去 Their opinions are not representative enough to be treated as the evidence for bad services of Good-Taste Company. The author should give more views of the majority of employees. Maybe the three persons are just those who have special demands on diets, and their complaints are just caused by their personal reasons, while having nothing to do with the overall appearance of the company. Also, the author should not evaluate the service of the company just relying on the situation of last month.一个月短可以再展开一句 In short, the author needs to provide us more information about the evaluations of the everyday services of Good-Taste Company, which offered by more people.

Moreover, the author should not unwarrantedly conclude that the Discount surly serves better than other companies. The author fails to conduct a survey, which reveal the preference of the employees towards the food. It is entirely possible that most of them have no interests in fish and poultry. Then just providing the personal experience of tasting in Discount, the author cannot conclude that food offered by this company is delicious. To bolster his conclusion, the author needs to invite more people to have a try. Then, even if the food is really delicious, it does not follows that Discount will lead to improved employee satisfaction. Since more factors should be considered, such as outstanding services, good prestige, and the quality of food. Thus, the author needs to provide more detailed information about Discount besides his or her own evaluation.D比T好不公平，我觉得最要的是这里充满了不公平的比较。首先，作者说T不对个人口味提供，那D就提吗？再有，说D可以提供鱼和禽，那T就不提吗，可能T提供的选择更多。再有就是作者用他个人的仅吃了一顿饭（万一赶上那天是偶然的好呢）的正评价和公司三个人的负评价作结论说D的更好，个人原因为一条，可能那个公司抱怨D的人更多。还有D是个家庭拥有的，可能规模小，建得晚，而T可能是个股份公司，它历史悠久，信誉也好，经受风险的能力也强，大家要吃一年饭呢，这一年啥事没可能啊。总之，我觉得能批的地方很多很多，当然，估计这些都批的话着实得费一番工夫的。你现在做的很outstanding

In sum, before giving suggestion, the author should provide more representative and comprehensive information of both the Good-Taste Company and Discount, including food tasting, services, and quality of food. What's more, the author should carefully acknowledge the preference of employees of Cedar Corporation, in order to pursue more satisfactions.

很好。

我的马甲UID: 2177806

ARGUMENT 179
- The following is a memorandum written by the director of personnel to the president of the Cedar Corporation.

"It would be a mistake to rehire the Good-Taste Company to supply the food in our employee cafeteria next year. It is the second most expensive caterer in the city. In addition, its prices have risen in each of the last three years, and it refuses to provide meals for people on special diets. Just last month three employees complained to me that they no longer eat in the cafeteria because they find the experience 'unbearable.' Our company should instead hire Discount Foods. Discount is a family-owned local company and it offers a varied menu of fish and poultry. I recently tasted a sample lunch at one of the many companies that Discount serves and it was delicious-an indication that hiring Discount will lead to improved employee satisfaction."
这题放眼一看，怎么感觉到处都是错误啊。
WORDS：490          TIME：0:30:00          DATE：2006-2-5
提纲：
1关于价钱。首先高价也许是由于特别好的服务。其次没有提供关于D的价钱问题
2没有充分证据说明G 的服务不好。首先三个人的意见不能说明问题。其次上个月的情况是不够的。
3D不一定好，首先员工的口味信息要提供。其次，作者一个人的意见没有办法说明问题。再次要得到满意，还有很多因素。

Criticizing the high price and dissatisfaction of three employees of the Good-Taste Company, providing the personal experience of tasting in Discount , the author suggests that the corporation should hire the latter for supplying food. However, since the evidence is insufficient and the comparison is not scientific enough, the suggestion is completely open to doubt.

To begin with, even the prices of Good-Taste Company really higher than the others, it does not mean that it should not be rehired. It is entirely possible that the higher prices are caused by especially outstanding services. The author should provide information about the market position of this company, since the opinions of customers are the most credible judgments. Perhaps, their ever rising prices are resulted by their improving quality and better reflection of customers. In addition, the author fails to offer any information about the prices of the Discount serves. Maybe their prices are also very high, or even higher than those of Good-Taste Company. Without carefully analyzing analysisand comparison, the author should no criticize the high prices of the Good-Taste Company.很清楚，和我的想法差不多。

Furthermore, the author should not depend too much on the complaints of just three employees. 没有把1个月短概括进去 Their opinions are not representative enough to be treated as the evidence for bad services of Good-Taste Company. The author should give more views of the majority of employees. Maybe the three persons are just those who have special demands on diets, and their complaints are just caused by their personal reasons, while having nothing to do with the overall appearance of the company. Also, the author should not evaluate the service of the company just relying on the situation of last month.一个月短可以再展开一句 In short, the author needs to provide us more information about the evaluations of the everyday services of Good-Taste Company, which offered by more people.

Moreover, the author should not unwarrantedly conclude that the Discount surly serves better than other companies. The author fails to conduct a survey, which reveal the preference of the employees towards the food. It is entirely possible that most of them have no interests in fish and poultry. Then just providing the personal experience of tasting in Discount, the author cannot conclude that food offered by this company is delicious. To bolster his conclusion, the author needs to invite more people to have a try. Then, even if the food is really delicious, it does not follows that Discount will lead to improved employee satisfaction. Since more factors should be considered, such as outstanding services, good prestige, and the quality of food. Thus, the author needs to provide more detailed information about Discount besides his or her own evaluation.D比T好不公平，我觉得最要的是这里充满了不公平的比较。首先，作者说T不对个人口味提供，那D就提吗？再有，说D可以提供鱼和禽，那T就不提吗，可能T提供的选择更多。再有就是作者用他个人的仅吃了一顿饭（万一赶上那天是偶然的好呢）的正评价和公司三个人的负评价作结论说D的更好，个人原因为一条，可能那个公司抱怨D的人更多。还有D是个家庭拥有的，可能规模小，建得晚，而T可能是个股份公司，它历史悠久，信誉也好，经受风险的能力也强，大家要吃一年饭呢，这一年啥事没可能啊。总之，我觉得能批的地方很多很多，当然，估计这些都批的话着实得费一番工夫的。你现在做的很outstanding

In sum, before giving suggestion, the author should provide more representative and comprehensive information of both the Good-Taste Company and Discount, including food tasting, services, and quality of food. What's more, the author should carefully acknowledge the preference of employees of Cedar Corporation, in order to pursue more satisfactions.

很好。