ISSUE4 米国有米第十一次作业

cckantUID: 2247822

TOPIC: ISSUE4 - "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
WORDS: 491          TIME: 0:55:03          DATE: 2006-9-29

On the ground that no single subject is isolated from other field of study, I am on the stand that advance in a field of study necessarily requires outside knowledge and experience. However, the statement that the progression of a field of study is brought by an outsider is somewhat vague, as definition of an outsider varies.

The development of a field of study takes place in two dimensions, i.e. in depth and in width. The dimension of width of a field of study measures how widely the theories is accepted and applied. In the process of a field of study to widen it influencing power, the unique way is to actively interact with as many other fields as possible. The outside knowledge is then a necessary condition in the subject interaction, since it is impossible to push a subject of study outward without understanding and applying the targeted subject. Propagation and application on a field of study call for outside knowledge. Similarly, outside experience is required as it lead the direction when a field of study is extending a broader field. Otherwise, the development of a study to build up its impact will be lost in the fog and be like a mouse keeps tracing its own tail.

On the deepening dimension, outside knowledge and experience is even more determining. To analyze why outside knowledge and experience is vital, we must first know that what essentially drives the advance in a subject. The answer is that it is the continuous incoming questions and problems and the substantial effort toward solving these questions and problems fuels the growth of a field of study. Yet, as a subject develops and matures, the theoretical foundation becomes more systematic and self-explainable. It means relative fewer problems exist and are available to be explored, in compare to the problems it has solved. After all, outside knowledge and experience always raises problems while seeking possible source for its own progress and therefore stimulates the subject concerned to boom. An example is that the modern economics resorts to the mathematical analysis and stochastic model to be robust in the 20th century.

The speaker may encounter a dispute on the word outsider in the statement. How should we define an outsider? Whenever there is an interaction in two or more fields of study, there must be an overlap of existing knowledge and experience to be shared. Even prior to the cooperation of participants in different fields, the intuitive of the possibility of mutual stimulation gained in the subject cooperation and integration makes no one to be outsider in strict sense.

In sum, from the development history of science, art, engineering and so forth, it is difficult to reject that outside knowledge and experience is a condition that remove that upper bound constraining a field. Outsider, only if defined loosely and usually interchanges it role accordingly, open a window and allow sunshine for the growth in a field of study.

holdingUID: 2285054

ISSUE4 米国有米第十一次作业
TOPIC: ISSUE4 - "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
WORDS: 491          TIME: 0:55:03          DATE: 2006-9-29

On the ground that no single subject is isolated from other field of study, I am on the stand that advance in a field of study necessarily requires outside knowledge and experience. However, the statement that the progression (process) of a field of study is brought by an outsider is somewhat vague, as definition of an outsider varies.(as the variety of definition of outsider)

The development of a field of study takes place in two dimensions, i.e. in depth and in width. The dimension of width of a field of study measures how widely the theories is accepted and applied. In the process of a field of study to widen it influencing power, the unique way is to actively interact with as many other fields as possible. The outside knowledge is then a necessary condition in the subject interaction, since it is impossible to push a subject of study outward without understanding and applying the targeted subject. Propagation and application on a field of study call for outside knowledge. Similarly, outside experience is required as it lead the direction when a field of study is extending a broader field. Otherwise, the development of a study to build up its impact will be lost in the fog and be like a mouse keeps tracing its own tail.

in my opinion, if a field have been abroad, it will become another field, do you think so? 就像生物和生物化学不是一回事一样。

On the deepening dimension, outside knowledge and experience is even more determining. To analyze why outside knowledge and experience is vital, we must first know that what essentially drives the advance in a subject. The answer is that it is the continuous incoming questions and problems and the substantial effort toward solving these questions and problems fuels the growth of a field of study. Yet, as a subject develops and matures, the theoretical foundation becomes more systematic and self-explainable. It means relative fewer problems exist and are available to be explored, in compare to the problems it has solved. After all, outside knowledge and experience always raises problems while seeking possible source for its own progress and therefore stimulates the subject concerned to boom. An example is that the modern economics resorts to the mathematical analysis and stochastic model to be robust in the 20th century.

The speaker may encounter a dispute on the word outsider in the statement. How should we define an outsider? Whenever there is an interaction in two or more fields of study, there must be an overlap of existing knowledge and experience to be shared. Even prior to the cooperation of participants in different fields, the intuitive of the possibility of mutual stimulation gained in the subject cooperation and integration makes no one to be outsider in strict sense.

In sum, from the development history of science, art, engineering and so forth, it is difficult to reject that outside knowledge and experience is a condition that remove that upper bound constraining a field. Outsider, only if defined loosely and usually interchanges it role accordingly, open a window and allow (welcome) sunshine for the growth in a field of study.

总体来说，感觉第二.三段和definition of the outsider联系不是很紧密，其实就差一点，点破了就明白了。因为你的文章主要是从definition下手论述的，所以最好都联系上这个论点。还有就是字数上偏少一点。共勉！