Issue 51 【Chasing For "6" Score】第一次作业

leiniaUID: 156136

Issue51 [Chasing For "6" Score]第一次作业

Issue51 [Chasing For "6" Score]第一次作业

【题目】Education will be truly effective only whenit is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of eachstudent.
【翻译】只有针对每个学生的需要和兴趣，教育才真正的有意义。
【题纲】
partially agree with the author

reason:  specific education has advantage in emphasis on students' special abilities and interests. Yet it is impractical to give every student specific education
support:  1.Only one form of education could not meet the needs of different students
          2.The facts showed that many elites were produced by specific education (eg. Liu Yiting and Confucius)
against:  1.Uniform education has an advantage in developing solidification and charity of students.
          2.Giving each student a specific education is a waste of educational resources
conclusion:  Uniform is the foundation, while specific education is also needed to produce elites

【正文】
I agree with the author's broad assertion that education which is specifically designed to meet personal needs often develops excellent students or elites. Nevertheless, the author unnecessarily extends this broad assertion to the point that each student should receive a specifically designed education and moreover this kind of education is really effective. My contention with the author involves the advantages and disadvantages of this kind of education will be discussed below.

The implicit rationale behind the author's statement seems to be that different students have different personality, good qualities and interests, it is almost impossible to develop only one form of education to meet the needs of all the disparate students. For instance, some students have a strong interest in physics, while others are good at literature. Thus, it is inappropriate to give the former kind of students a lot of writing classes or let the latter one do many physical experiments. Yet, giving each student a specifically designed education goes extreme. That will be a great waste of educational and social resources.

It might also be tempting to agree with the author on the basis that specifically designed education seems to bring up more celebrities and elites than normal school education. As in the case of Liu Yiting, a Chinese girl who finally got an offer from School of Business, Harvord, a normal education was not adopted. Instead Liu's mother taught her at home. Another case is that ancient Chinese saint Confucius usually talked separately with his disciples and taught them in different ways. These facts showed that separate education has successfully molded some most talented people.

On the other hand are compelling arguments that formal education systems should be set up, even though students do have various abilities. One such argue is that a uniform education do help to develop the solidification and team spirit of students, which are sometimes more important than talents or abilities. Admitted, separate education has an advantage in development of students' brilliance, while uniform education can won it by successful culturing precious spirits and disposition of students, such as patriotism and charity. With out those spirits, a talent and capable person could be useless or even harmful to society. Take Hitler for instance, who was a brilliant leader and artist, hurt millions of innocent civilian and brought the world into war. The case of Hitler indicates that minds of high morality are also key point in judging whether an education system is successful.

Another argument against the author's position is to do with the effectiveness. Even though specifically designed education does better help to develop students' skills and abilities, it requires lots of educational resources including teachers, classrooms, foundations and etc. The author might argue that the elites produced by it can easily return the society more worthiness. Yet, ignorance of the fact that most students will choose to do ordinary jobs which might create less social worthiness and give all of them the luxurious separate education would be a great waste.

In the final analysis, it is not easy to have a ultimate choice between specifically designed education and uniform education. In my view, a good way to solve the problem is to establish a uniform educational system to meet the needs of most common students. And at the same time, specific education also needed to be applied to produce elites and greats who push the progress of society.

[ 本帖最后由 leinia 于 2007-1-31 20:56 编辑 ]

stonesundlutUID: 2235257

I agree with the author's broad assertion 能告诉我broad assertion 是什么意思吗 that education which is specifically designed to meet personal needs often develops excellent students or elites. Nevertheless, the author unnecessarily 我觉得应该是过分的比较好些excessively extends this broad assertion to the point that each student should receive a specifically designed education and moreover this kind of education is really effective. My contention with the author involves the advantages and disadvantages of this kind of education will be discussed below.

The implicit rationale behind the author's statement seems to be that different students have different personality personalities, good qualities and interests, it is almost impossible to develop only one form of education to meet the needs of all the disparate students. For instance, some students have a strong interest in physics, while others are good at literature. Thus, it is inappropriate to give the former kind of students a lot of writing classes or let the latter one do many physical experiments. Yet, giving each student a specifically designed education goes extreme. That will be a great waste of educational and social resources. 既然你的下一段也没有讨论这个问题，为什么要在这个地方给出这个观点呢？

It might also be tempting to agree with the author on the basis that specifically designed education seems to bring up more celebrities and elites than normal school education. As in the case of Liu Yiting, a Chinese girl who finally got an offer from School of Business, Harvord Harvard, and a normal education was not adopted. Instead Liu's mother taught her at home to meet her interests 不然体现不出满足个体需求的优点. Another case is that ancient Chinese saint Confucius usually talked separately with his disciples and taught them in different ways. good example These facts showed that separate education has successfully molded some most talented people.

On the other hand 缺少主语 are compelling arguments that formal education systems should be set up, even though students do have various abilities. One such argue is that a uniform education do help to develop the solidification and team spirit of students, which are sometimes more important than talents or abilities. Admitted Admittedly, separate education has an advantage in development of students' brilliance, while uniform education can won it by successful culturing precious spirits and disposition of students, such as patriotism and charity. Without those spirits, a talent and capable person could be useless or even harmful to society. Take Hitler for instance, who was a brilliant leader and artist, hurt millions of innocent civilian and brought the world into war. The case of Hitler indicates that minds of high morality are also key point in judging whether an education system is successful or not.

Another argument against the author's position is to do with the effectiveness. Even though specifically designed education does better help to develop students' skills and abilities, it requires lots of educational resources including teachers, classrooms, foundations and etc. The author might argue that the elites produced by it can easily return the society more worthiness wealth. Yet, ignorance of the fact that most students will choose to do ordinary jobs which might create less social worthiness and give supplying all of them the luxurious separate education would be a great waste. 我没看错的话，这句话的主语是ignorance and give 吧，所以give应该是动名词

In the final analysis, it is not easy to have a ultimate choice between specifically designed education and uniform education. In my view, a good way to solve the problem is to establish a uniform educational system to meet the needs of most common students. And at the same time, specific education also needed to be applied to produce elites and greats who push the progress of society.
你的文章的结果和表达都不错，个别语法错误请注意。但我觉得你首先肯定应该满足individual’s needs 又强调这样做是资源浪费，不太现实，感觉你的两个观点有点冲突导致说服力不强。个人意见欢迎讨论。LZ加油！

leiniaUID: 156136

觉得你评论的很对，非常感谢！！