issue4 第7篇 - 研究领域的互相借鉴 - 有拍必回

linxzUID: 2225479

"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their
knowledge and experience to that field of study."

Could the study in one field attain significant achievement without the help of
outsiders? The speaker claims that it couldn't. I fundamentally agree with him,
yet a clearer analysis would be based on a case-by-case study.

I concede that some subjects, though rare, have achieved independent
developments. The progress of Group Theory would furnish a good example. The
theory, initiated and developed by Galois, a French genius, consists of a series
of abstract concepts which can hardly be borrowed from any other study fields.
It was so complicated that even the mathematical community spent nearly a decade
to understand it. To my observation, the existence of independent study field
such as Group Theory, largely results from the mixing of the sophisticated and
theoretical characteristics of such fields and the efforts of few distinguished
talents.

However, phenomena like Group Theory are quite few throughout the human history.
Generally speaking, studies of various fields usually interact actively and
advance together. On one hand, different research fields can share the common
study methods, and methods can be concluded from a mass of experiences. It is
not yet forgotten that physics has significantly benefited from the some well-
developed methods of mathematics, such as analogy, extrapolation, etc. Further,
progresses of every research fields are extremely unbalanced. The new-developed,
or under-developed disciplines are on highly demand of experiences from those
well-developed disciplines. Without the relative experiences in psychology,
machine learning, an important subject of artificial intelligence, would miss its
way in darkness. Similarly, mature research methods of natural languages has
greatly improved the study of computer language design.

On the other, knowledge, in the form of results gained by study in certain realm
would go a long way to contribute to the study of other realms. For instance, to
detect the cancer cells among millions of healthy ones, doctors could use modern
medical manner involving the technique of pattern recognition, which is a focus
of information science. What's more, to determine the exact age of a crockery,
the archaeologist should employ chemical, optical, and thermal techniques.

In the modern society, the boundary of disciplines is increasingly vague. Study
tasks are often so comprehensive that could be finished with mere knowledge in
one single traditional area. If the biologist try to measure and record the
sequences of enormous sums of human genes by hands, the paces of genetic
biological research would be unlimitedly postponed. Luckily, with the help of
computer scientists, they could use automatic devices to analyze the human genes
and store the results on the disks. Nowadays, a deep research on a certain field
would inevitably involves the fruits of other fields.

To sum up, despite few exceptions exist, I agree with the speaker's broad
contention. There is almost no independent study field, especially in the modern
society, when the tasks of study are more synthetic and complicated.

ann01UID: 2196411

跟你比我真太那个了,已经两三天没发习作了~~不过改作文也是锻炼哦?
看你这篇没人改,先看它吧.

ann01UID: 2196411

Could the study in one field attain significant achievement without the help of
outsiders? The speaker claims that it couldn't. I fundamentally agree with him,
yet a clearer analysis would be based on a case-by-case study.

I concede that some subjects, though rare, have achieved independent
developments. The progress of Group Theory would furnish a good example. The
theory, initiated and developed by Galois, a French genius, consists of a series
of abstract concepts which can hardly be borrowed from any other study fields.
It was so complicated that even the mathematical community spent nearly a decade
to understand it. To my observation, the existence of independent study field
such as Group Theory, largely results from the mixing of the sophisticated and
theoretical characteristics of such fields and the efforts of few distinguished
talents.

However, phenomena like Group Theory are quite few throughout the human history.
Generally speaking, studies of various fields usually interact actively and
advance together. On one hand, different research fields can share the common
study methods, and methods can be concluded from a mass of experiences. It is
not yet forgotten that physics has significantly benefited from the some well-
developed methods of mathematics, such as analogy, extrapolation, etc. Further,
progresses of every research fields are extremely unbalanced. The new-developed,
or under-developed disciplines are on highly demand of experiences from those
well-developed disciplines. Without the relative experiences in psychology,
machine learning, an important subject of artificial intelligence, would miss its
way in darkness. Similarly, mature research methods of natural languages has
greatly improved the study of computer language design.

On the (other hand), knowledge, in the form of results gained by study in certain realm
would go a long way to contribute to the study of other realms. For instance, to
detect the cancer cells among millions of healthy ones, doctors could use modern
medical manner involving the technique of pattern recognition, which is a focus
of information science. What's more, to determine the exact age of a crockery,
the archaeologist should employ chemical, optical, and thermal techniques.

In the modern society, the boundary of disciplines is increasingly vague. (Study
tasks are often too comprehensive to be finished) with mere knowledge in
one single traditional area. If the biologist try to measure and record the
sequences of enormous sums of human genes by hands, the paces of genetic
biological research would be unlimitedly postponed. Luckily, with the help of
computer scientists, they could use automatic devices to analyze the human genes
and store the results on the disks. Nowadays, a deep research on a certain field
would inevitably involves the fruits of other fields.

To sum up, despite few exceptions exist, I agree with the speaker's broad
contention. There is almost no independent study field, especially in the modern
society, when the tasks of study are more synthetic and complicated