寄托天下
查看: 1518|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue87大家多指教,这么写会不会算跑题? [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
893
注册时间
2006-1-13
精华
0
帖子
5
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2006-7-26 16:05:39 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
issue87"In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."

The arguer asserts that in any field of inquiry, compared with experts, there are more possibilities for beginners to make important discoveries. Considering all the factors lead to the success of making a discovery, I tend to agree that no matter who he is, acute observation, sufficient knowledge, courage of innovation are the crucial characters for him in the process of searching.

To begin with, a successful discoverer should have the ability of observing normal or fantastic things. Numerous phenomena and changes occurred everywhere and everyday, if a person want to probe the principle of the nature, acute observation is an primary quality. Sun raise and down everyday, only the person who is good at detecting can ponder why it happened. Apples always fall from the trees, only Newton sum up the law of gravity. Rearmost can fly in the dark, only few people noticed that and invent the radar. Compared the huge number of experts or beginners with the limited great discoveries in every field, it is easy to come to the conclusion that no matter experts or beginners, who own the ability of observing phenomena can have more chances to make important discoveries.

In the second places, experts or beginners who want to make important discoveries should be erudite in this area. It is not hard for a person to see a phenomenon or has the consciousness of why it happened. To organize the whole theory to describe or sum up it is an outstanding contribution. Maybe lots of people see apples fall from the trees and think about why that occurred, but they did not hold abundant theories to build the law of gravity. Knowledge is the foundation to make a completely system of one’s thinking. Without enough knowledge, it is hard for a person to make an integrated discovery.

Another crucial character for a person in the process of discovery is the courage of persisting in his own theory. Usually before a person can make big progress, he has to undergo an anguished period. If he did not insist on his own faith, he may give up when he did not achieve the accomplishment. From other aspects, it is possible that when a new theory was put forward for the first time, a lot of disagreements may come from different people even the authorities. Facing these critiques whether he can persevere his idea to the end is a challenge.

In conclusion, it is not important that whether he is an expert or a beginner. The person who own the merits of acute observation, sufficient knowledge, courage of innovation may have more opportunities to make an important discovery.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
2902
注册时间
2006-2-18
精华
0
帖子
35
沙发
发表于 2006-7-26 16:29:37 |只看该作者
个人认为似乎是边缘文章...

前两天写了一个ISSUE, 就是全球性大学之世界难题那篇.我把侧重点放在了世界难题与大学上而非global上,结果华丽地跑了...


平常心,平常心。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
893
注册时间
2006-1-13
精华
0
帖子
5
板凳
发表于 2006-7-26 17:21:26 |只看该作者
谢谢无限抱拥~~,
那大家评评是论点选的不好吗?还是body部分内容不好呢?考试的时候很怕这样的,

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
520
注册时间
2006-5-17
精华
0
帖子
4
地板
发表于 2006-8-1 09:45:38 |只看该作者
感觉你写的是 如果要成功 人需要具备什么样的素质 而不是新手老手的比较

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
6
寄托币
5599
注册时间
2005-12-6
精华
6
帖子
8

Taurus金牛座 荣誉版主

5
发表于 2006-8-1 09:47:16 |只看该作者
原帖由 清新氧气 于 2006-8-1 09:45 发表
感觉你写的是 如果要成功 人需要具备什么样的素质 而不是新手老手的比较

agree!
How to Eat Fried Worms?

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
796
注册时间
2006-2-28
精华
0
帖子
6
6
发表于 2006-8-1 11:00:49 |只看该作者

我感觉跑题了

人家是要你比较 新手和老手哪个更加容易有新的发现,你的文章没有对比

建议看看这篇文章:

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=201072

使用道具 举报

RE: issue87大家多指教,这么写会不会算跑题? [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue87大家多指教,这么写会不会算跑题?
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-501751-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部