Issue87 [ACE]7.29作业

晴天丫头UID: 2225690

87"In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."

今天这篇写得特别不好.自己先改了好多可还是觉得论述的不深刻而且这方面的语言实在贫乏.也没有计时到底用了多久. 谢谢一休还有fish帮忙改改

In various fields of inquiry, who is more likely to make important discoveries, the beginner or the expert? The speaker asserts that no matter in which realm, beginner always has more possibility. From my point of view, however, this assertion is too extreme to be acceptable. In fact beginner and expert have the same opportunity to make discoveries, since both of them have predominance respectively.

On the one hand, experts are familiar with the thorough knowledge system, which is significant for a researcher to make important discoveries. As philosophy tells us, the change in quantity leads to the change in quality. Similarly, as long as a researcher accumulates enough knowledge, experience, and complex links among different aspects in his/her field, he/she can sensitively find the valuable objects. Also in this way, the researcher can design particular experiment or survey with certain destination. This will save large amounts of energy. Take Mary Curie for instance, without ten-year hard research and study, how could she find the appropriate path to find and extract the important element- Po.  In this respect, experts, with the management of universal regular in their field, might make great discoveries with the help of a clear destination and precious experience.

On the other hand, beginners are also capable of making discoveries, since their brains are not occupied with mountains of traditional minds. Although knowledge and experience are necessary to discoveries, they might, to some extent, cause the result of ossification. It reminds me the process to discover Br. Actually, Liebig, a German chemist in 19th, had found Br two years earlier than the final discoverer-Ballardg, who has little fame at that time. However, Liebig simply misunderstood it as Cl when he first met the element. It is right the so called precious experience lead to such a pity for Liebig. Thus, as beginners, they are free to research and analyze without the band of normal experience, which also makes it possible to discover new objects.

Now that both expert and beginner have prerequisite to discover, the point is whether they can make full use of their advantages respectively. If only experts can use their knowledge in the right way to discover and avoid the side-affect of traditional minds, especially the ossification, they can make important discoveries accurately and effectively. Similarly, if only beginners can use their free mind accompany with sufficient knowledge, they can also achieve the same destination.

In conclusion, it is not certainly that whether expert or beginner is more likely to make important discoveries. Both of them have their own advantages and disadvantages; as long as they can regard and use these in a proper way, they have the same opportunity to discover new objects.

[ 本帖最后由 晴天丫头 于 2006-7-29 20:39 编辑 ]

wp123UID: 2187508

87"In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."

今天这篇写得特别不好.自己先改了好多可还是觉得论述的不深刻而且这方面的语言实在贫乏.也没有计时到底用了多久. 谢谢一休还有fish帮忙改改

In various fields of inquiry, who is more likely to make important discoveries, the beginner or the expert? The speaker asserts that no matter in which realm, beginner always has more possibility. From my point of view, however, this assertion is too extreme to be acceptable. In fact beginner and experta+ or +s have the same opportunity to make discoveries, since both of them have predominance respectively.

On the one hand, experts are familiar with the thorough knowledge system, which is significant以后用crucial and central，这两个词并列起来很高级哦~ for a researcher to make important discoveries. As philosophy tells us, the change in quantity leads to the change in quality.牛，最好背下来 Similarly, as long as a researcher accumulates enough knowledge, experience, and complex links among different aspects in his/her field, he/she can sensitively find the valuable objects. Also in this way, the researcher can design particular experiment or survey with certain destination. This will save large amounts of energy. Take Mary Curie for instance, without ten-year hard research and study, how could she find the appropriate path to find and extract the important element- Po.  我总觉得，用这样的不是这个行业的例子没有说服力。用ARGUMENT的思路想，这叫FALSE ANALOGY。呵呵，不如我们自己设置一个情景的例子，ETS有一个5分的文章就是自己设置了医院的例子In this respect, experts, with the management of universal regular in their field, might make great discoveries with the help of a clear destination and precious experience.

On the other hand, beginners are also capable of making discoveries, since their brains are not occupied with mountains of traditional minds. Although knowledge and experience are necessary to discoveries, they might, to some extent, cause the result of ossification同意思词汇rigidity. It reminds me the process to discover Br突然出来这个东西我还真没一下看明白. Actually, Liebig, a German chemist in 19th, had found Br two years earlier than the final discoverer-Ballardg, who has little fame at that time. However, Liebig simply misunderstood it as Cl when he first met the element. It is right the so called so-calledprecious experience lead to such a pity for Liebig. Thus, as beginners, they are free to research and analyze without the band of normal experience, which also makes it possible to discover new objects.

Now that both expert and beginner have prerequisite to discover, the point is whether they can make full use of their advantages respectively. If only experts can use their knowledge in the right way to discover and avoid the side-affect of traditional minds, especially the ossification, they can make important discoveries accurately and effectively. Similarly, if only beginners can use their free mind accompany with用along with，简单，地道。 sufficient knowledge, they can also achieve the same destination.

In conclusion, it is not certainlycertain that whether expert or beginner is more likely to make important discoveries. Both of them have their own advantages and disadvantages; as long as they can regard and use these in a proper way, they have the same opportunity to discover new objects.



观点层次鲜明，但是不够深。我觉得还是应该多从INQUIRY的本身下手，而不是从大的新手与老手的关系谈。论坛上前人写的东西，基本上立意都一样，这样如果真的出了这个题目，这么写的话恐怕得不了高分。呵呵~不过晴天丫头还是有进步的~~~呵呵，我们一起限制时间吧~

晴天丫头UID: 2225690

嗯
限时限时~~~
要不考试真要抓狂了
呵呵

谢谢你
我在举例上真的问题很多啊

Fighting~~

SiriusFishUID: 2170063

恩
一个小时以后来改

SiriusFishUID: 2170063

In various fields of inquiry, who is more likely to make important discoveries, the beginner or the expert? The speaker asserts that no matter in which realm, beginner always has more possibility possibilities. From my point of view, however, this assertion is too extreme to be acceptable. In fact beginner and expert have the same opportunity to make discoveries, since both of them have predominance respectively.

On the one hand, experts are familiar with the thorough knowledge system, which is significant for a researcher to make important discoveries. As philosophy tells us, the change in quantity leads to the change in quality. Similarly, as long as a researcher accumulates enough knowledge, experience, and complex links among different aspects in his/her field, he/she can sensitively find the valuable objects. Also in this way, the researcher can design particular experiment or survey with certain destination. This will save large amounts of energy. Take Mary Curie for instance, without ten-year hard research and study, how could she find the appropriate path to find and extract the important element- Po.  In this respect, experts, with the management of universal regular in their field, might make great discoveries with the help of a clear destination and precious experience.

On the other hand, beginners are also capable of making discoveries, since their brains are not occupied with mountains of traditional minds. Although knowledge and experience are necessary to discoveries, they might, to some extent, cause the result of ossification. It reminds me the process to discover Br. Actually, Liebig, a German chemist in 19th, had found Br two years earlier than the final discoverer-Ballardg, who has little fame at that time. 没有什么名气并不代表他是新手 However, Liebig simply misunderstood it as Cl when he first met the element. 是不是要具体说一下这个Cl的misunderstand是由经验造成的？，只说了结果是被误认为氯；在表示元素的时候最好能向上一段，说明一下， 或者写全称（这样有点难度），很有可能阅卷的人一下子糊涂，不懂你说的是什么  It is right the so called precious experience lead to such a pity for Liebig. Thus, as beginners, they are free to research and analyze without the band of normal experience, which also makes it possible to discover new objects.

Now that both expert and beginner have prerequisite to discover, the point is whether they can make full use of their advantages respectively. 首句是说分别充分利用他们的优势， 后面两句又是在讲要各取所长来达到更好的效果，似乎可以说得过去，但我觉得最好还是调整一下 If only experts can use their knowledge in the right way to discover and avoid the side-affect of traditional minds, especially the ossification, they can make important discoveries accurately and effectively. Similarly, if only beginners can use their free mind accompany with sufficient knowledge, they can also achieve the same destination.

In conclusion, it is not certainly that whether expert or beginner is more likely to make important discoveries. Both of them have their own advantages and disadvantages; as long as they can regard and use these 指代advantages 还是 disadvantages呢，或者是两个都指代，我可以理解你的意思，但是这里表达有点不清楚 in a proper way, they have the same opportunity to discover new objects.这个的意思是发现新东西吧？object是主要指有实体的东西吧？那么一些理论的发现是不是没有包括在这个new objects范围里呢？

SiriusFishUID: 2170063

立意一样倒不会必然导致分数不高
不管怎么样
把自己的东西表达清楚再说（不是说你表达不清哈，只是后面有一段有点问题）
两方面同时努力