issue17 社会类－法律 机经题 issue17 社会类－法律 机经题

ironcatUID：2119178

issue17 社会类－法律 机经题 哪个好心人赏个脸拍一下！

Issue17  just and unjust laws
“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.”

Today, there is always a controversy that some people believe that everyone in a society has an obligation to obey just laws but could disobey and resist unjust laws, others argue that whatever the law is just or unjust, people have the responsibility to obey all of them. In my point of view, I support the latter attitudes toward laws, although someone may claim that lots of laws are unfair to a part of people.

To begin with, it is entirely correct for everyone to obey the just laws. As we know, to obey the laws will allow the society to run regularly and safely, though sometimes people will be restricted by laws. These seemly restrictions will eventually bring about benefits and conveniences to the populace. For instance, everyone should have the experience about the traffic laws. When people drive to the cross road, there are always existing traffic lights. Then the cars should stop to wait when encountering the red light. It seems to hinder our trip, but considering without the traffic lights, maybe more often the traffic jams will happen there and even the traffic accidents. So we can conclude (see that) the laws on the traffic lights will actually bring us convenience.

However, someone will argue that the just laws are certain to obey but what about the unjust laws. My response (reply) is that people also need to conform to the unjust laws. The most important reason is that different people have different opinion about different laws, some may think it just and the other may argue it as unjust ones. Therefore it can not determine which laws are just or not just according to the personal opinions. If everyone has its own criteria about the justice of laws and merely obey these just laws, the society will be extremely instable. Here is an example happening in China. The well-known Three Gorges project is taken in Hubei province in China. For the project, many people who live there generation by generation will be forced to leave the three gorges area. These people think the laws forcing them to leave their hometown very unfair, but most people believe that this Three Gorges project will actually bring about large benefits to all of the Chinese. If these native people in three gorges area resist the laws and government intensely just according to their own standards about laws, they will bring large disaster the society.

Furthermore, if a large part people of the country feel some laws actually unjust, they should wait to amend these laws, meanwhile people should still conform to the laws before the amendment of these unjust laws. For the laws in any country, when the laws were firstly made, they might be just to the people and society, but with the pace of the society's development, it turned to be unjust. So it needs the legislators to amend those laws. And in the any democratic country, the unjust laws will be modified or replaced eventually.

To sum up, no matter whether the laws are just or unjust, people are obligated to obey them in order to keep the society regular, stable and convenient. People should not conclude the justice of laws just according to their own opinions and interests, and decide whether to obey these laws. If some laws are certain out of time, people should amend or replace those laws through the legislations.

fircattyUID：166248

占座，太晚了，明天贴上来~~

ironcatUID：2119178

谢谢啊！：）

fircattyUID：166248

Issue17  just and unjust laws
“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.”

Today, there is always a controversy that some people believe that everyone in a society has an obligation to obey just laws but could disobey and resist unjust laws, others argue that whatever the law is just or unjust, people have the responsibility to obey all of them. In my point of view, I support the latter attitudes toward laws, although someone may claim that lots of laws are unfair to a part of people.

To begin with, it is entirely correct for everyone to obey the just laws. As we know, （ to obey） obeying the laws will allow the society to run regularly and safely, though sometimes people will be restricted by laws. These seemly restrictions will eventually bring about benefits and conveniences不可数 to the populace. For instance, everyone （should） 删掉 havehas the experience about the traffic laws. When people drive to the cross road, (there are always existing) 建议改成there always exist traffic lights. Then the cars should stop to wait when encountering the red light. It seems to hinder our trip, but considering without the traffic lights, maybe more often the traffic jams will happen there and even the traffic accidents. So we can conclude (see that) the laws on the traffic lights will actually bring us convenience.

However, someone will argue that the just laws are certain to obey but what about the unjust laws. My response (reply) is that people also need to conform to the unjust laws. The most important reason is that different people have different opinion about different laws, some may think it just and the other may argue it as unjust ones. Therefore it can not determine which laws are just or not just according to the personal opinions.既然个人不能判断just ot unjust，那到底是通过什么方法来判断呢？从文章开头到这里你一直在用just 和unjust这样的词，但到这里都没有解释怎么区分just和unjust If everyone has its own criteria about the justice of laws and merely obey these just laws, the society will be extremely instable. Here is an example happening in China. The well-known Three Gorges project is taken in Hubei province in China. For the project, many people who live there generation by generation will be forced to leave the three gorges area. These people think the laws forcing them to leave their hometown very unfair, but most people believe that this Three Gorges project will actually bring about large benefits to all of the 删 Chinese. If these native people in three gorges area resist the laws and government intensely just according to their own standards about laws, they will bring large disaster the society.

Furthermore, if a large part people of the country feel some laws actually unjust, they should wait to amend these laws, meanwhile people should still conform to the laws before the amendment of these unjust laws. For the laws in any country,删 when the laws were firstly made, they might be just to the people and society, but with the pace of the society's development, itthey turned to be unjust. So it needs the legislators to amend those laws which need to amend. And in the删 any democratic country, the unjust laws will be modified or replaced eventually.

To sum up, no matter whether the laws are just or unjust, people are obligated to obey them in order to keep the society regular, stable and convenient. People should not conclude the justice of laws just according to their own opinions and interests, and decide whether to obey these laws. If some laws are certain out of time, people should amend or replace those laws through the legislations.just和unjust这个概念一直延续到结尾还没有解释
总结一下，比较大的逻辑上的问题就是上面说的你承认just and unjust laws的存在，也指出不能因个人判断是否just，到底什么是判断依据？还是说根本就不存在什么just或unjust？另外，语言上有点罗索，稍微改了一下，感觉有点chinglish，要注意了。例子举得还不错。个人意见，仅供参考。呵呵，加油吧

fircattyUID：166248

楼主不给一点反馈意见吗？

ironcatUID：2119178

不好意思， 睡午觉刚起床，不知道这几天中午怎么这么困。

fircattyUID：166248

没关系，楼主哪天考？
我也刚写了这篇，可能自己的意见有点先入为主，一会你帮我也看看吧~~呵呵

ironcatUID：2119178

7.29 就要考了，感觉自己作文底子太差，确实写出来文章总是有些chinglish的味道。
你把你作文的连接给我吧:handshake

[ Last edited by ironcat on 2005-7-22 at 14:48 ]

fircattyUID：166248

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=304329
谢谢了:)

ironcatUID：2119178

看了你给我改的文章，确实应该定义一下什么是just and unjust laws 至少应该说明一下人们是怎么认定unjust法律的。:p而且我发现写文章的时候特别喜欢到处用the， 提醒一下自己要注意:L