- 最后登录
- 2011-4-15
- 在线时间
- 65 小时
- 寄托币
- 164
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2009-6-25
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 127
- UID
- 2656795

- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 164
- 注册时间
- 2009-6-25
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
本帖最后由 Michael_Han 于 2009-7-22 21:20 编辑
How to become an effective leader, a public official? The speaker asserts highest ethical and moral standard as one significant condition. Well, from my standpoint, ethical and moral standard is definitely a quality outstanding leader maintains, however when it come to the highest ethical and moral standard, it may be too much to affect the flexibility of a leader.
Admittedly, ethical and moral standard plays a significant role in the leadership. First, there is a question that why people follow the leading of a certain person. The answer is that we trust him and consider he can unit us as a whole to fulfill our desire more efficiently than one person alone. Then how can we assess a person whether he is capable to be a great leader? Apart from impressive people skill and wisdom, I(在文章中似乎应该少用I we you,对论述不利)
also consider ethical and moral quality as necessary criteria. In this case, the leaders with morality are easier to gain the support of the public. For example, our mayor cares about his parents a lot. No matter how busy he is, he always squeezes occasionally visits in a(each) month. All we citizens speak highly of that and we'd like to carry out his policy, because we believe that he might treat us considerately almost as his parents if not equally.
In addition, a leader in the business realm of high moral standard could also create an adorable image of his company which brings it advantage in the market. Take a famous beverage in China called Wanglaoji as example. The leaders of this beverage corporation decided to donate one billion Yuan after informed of the magnitude earthquake happened in Sichuan Province on 12th May. The whole nation is concerned about the tragedy and touched by the considerable/meaningful donation. Then the sales of the beverage rocket up. If the sellers always make profit from us, why not let the corporation which take its social responsibility earn.(有点没看懂,make profit from 。。。如果总是从我们这里挣钱,为什么不让他承担社会责任的公司
挣钱??) That is exactly what will happen when a leader is of/with sense of social responsibility and high moral standards.
Yet, I do not agree that effective leaders should maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. Only the social-spiritual leaders are supposed to possessed(prossess) the highest ethical and moral standards to be example for the public. As for other leaders, too much morality may limit his(their) talent. If a leader would ask himself whether he obey the highest ethical standards before every word he is going to say and every movement he is going to take, could his leadership be effective? Certainly not.
Moreover, when it comes to competition which is inevitable, the highest morality, which evidently requires kindness and honest to everyone, seemed/seem to be unreasonable and stupid. For one of the major duties of the leaders is to ensure the interest of his team. Will a leader, who loses a big client to his competitor because he tells others their bid in order to maintain his honesty, be an effective leader? Furthermore, this point is more clear in the battle field. General Patton certainly is not of the highest ethical and moral standards for his irritability and dirty talking. However, he is still one of the most popular and well-known military leader in the history of US.
On balance, effective leaders are supposed to be of high ethical and moral standards, but not the highest. Can we imagine a leader without basic morality? I doubt if there is anyone who would like to follow him. However, too much limitation from moral aspect may affect the show of talent(develop one’s talent) and is difficult for individuals, who are also occupied by many other qualities to maintain, to reach.
文章中心
道德是一个领导者的品质
但是太高的道德要求就会束缚领导才能。
1 对于政治家
道德很重要
2 对于企业家道德也很重要
3 对于领导不应该保持最高的道德标准
商业例子
巴顿的例子
个人觉得在王老吉那段的论证有些仓促
我读过一遍后
我就在想,你那个例子是不是写跑了写到社会责任了?
之后重新看一遍才发现了与题目的联系
其次文章前两段都用的很生活的例子,是不是应该考虑换个例子
或者
和在一起?
例子建议:华盛顿?
为了国家的利益和民主
放弃总统的权利?
可能不是很合适
PS 文中的一些错误我用红色标出来了
可能不太好区分哪些是加的
哪些是替换的
我用word改的在这里看不出来额 我给你上传我的word
43 改.doc
(32 KB, 下载次数: 5)
|
|