issue 48 divine第三篇

DivineUID: 2650173

请大家指教~还是花了将近两个小时 限时感觉没法写完呀
48"The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made
possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten."

Anyone who has a brief knoledge in the history of mankind would believe that sometimes the most significant events and trends in history were made possible by group of people without names instead of the famous few. However the latter  have brought great changes to their time, which makes them different from other people and worthy of being studied by historians. In my view, emphasis placed on individuals are essential in understanding history so that it should not be subtracted.

Undoubtedly, human history is not made by some famous individuals, but by
common people who make up the biggest part of society,because it is them who
make big events possible by participating. And their behaviors give social trends a
defination. By groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten,The Great
Wall was built,The Crusades waged,and Appolo 13 launched.And social revolutions
took place only when the majority accepted new ideas and adapted to changes, regardless
of the power of famous ones. During French Revlution, citizens of Paris headed Louis XVI for
his indifference of their lives, which shows that the ordinary civilians have great effect on the path of
human beings.

Yet  the above fact can not diminish the importance of individuals in history.
It is always the famous few that act as leaders in significant events and social
trends or masters in his area which changes greatly due to their efforts. Necessarily through a careful research of their actions and minds can we have a clear view of their age and find answers to questions concerning the social development. For example,to study the philosophy of ancient Greek, we study Socrates and Plato;to get knowledge of the American Civil War,we focus on Lincoln and Grant;to understand the development of arts in Renaissiance, Micheangelo should be elaborately examined. What these great names share in common is that they have huge impact on a certain aspect of social development,historians who study without putting emphasis on them would not be able to make cogent propositions.

In addition, even if we admit the importance of the nameless groups in history, information about famous ones are  much more than that of anonymous ones,which result in a convinience in studying the former and difficulties in research of the latter. As a consequence, studying the famous few would be easier and promising a delicate result. Hence it remains the most effective strategy
for historians. For instance,a research on soldiers in Napoleon's army are not likely to work out. After all, there are little record concerning them other than their quantities or wars they took part in. This difficulty in history may be vital because historians depend on records to develop their ideas, without information a detailed research is almost impossible. That explained why it is
a better choice to study Napolean instead of his army.
In sum, although the actions and effects of common people should not be ignored, the famous individuals are still the  
fundamental resource, and preference of historians to study their lives and impacts should be regarded reasonable. When
this work is done and more information about the former becomes available, a research on them would be successful and meaningful.

DidasWUID: 2666962

Anyone who has a brief kno（w）ledge in the history of mankind would believe that sometimes the most significant events and trends in history were made possible by group of people without names instead of the famous few. However the latter  have brought great changes to their time, which makes them different from other people and worthy of being studied by historians. In my view, emphasis placed on individuals are essential in understanding history so that it should not be subtracted.

Undoubtedly, human history is not made by some famous individuals, but by
common people who make up the biggest part of society,because it is them who
make big events possible by participating. And their behaviors give social trends a
defination（我觉得这句太长了，而且感觉需要精炼一下，怎么看怎么感觉不连贯。). By groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten,The Great
Wall was built,The Crusades waged,and Appolo 13 launched.And social revolutions
took place only when the majority accepted new ideas and adapted to changes, regardless
of the power of famous ones. During French Revlution, citizens of Paris headed Louis XVI for
his indifference of their lives, which shows that the ordinary civilians have great effect on the path of
human beings.

后面我没在语句上找到什么问题。
我觉得吧，最后一段说调查英雄个人很方便，更有效，也是唯一的方法，写的相当不错，但是之前YET开始的那段怎么看都感觉没什么内容，好像主要在说的英雄很重要。
后面说研究希腊需要研究柏拉图和苏格拉底，研究美国内战需要研究格兰特和林肯。
看了几次以后发现，好像你的重点是想说，英雄个人是该领域最杰出的个体，那个领域当时的最前沿是由英雄创造的，所以藉由看英雄，我们可以得到更精确的结果。如果你想说的是这个的话，我个人建议把英雄对本领域改变很大这样比较重复的话精简几句，直接说明英雄代表当年最高水平，这样可能会更有效。

来晚了，欢迎回拍

DidasWUID: 2666962

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=991623&extra=