菜鸟作文求拍10.2 进军美利坚

doubledianUID: 2661760

K10.2 to solve the problems present and future is it necessary to understand the past
  In the recent years, there is a general controversy over the issue whether it is necessary for
people to understand the past when solve the problem present and future. Although some people claim that people should always look behind and learn some useful experiences as they going ahead, and this can help them solve the problem easier. Personally, I think it is not necessary for people to understand the past, as the problem exists now is different from that in old days, different conditions determined how the problem itself looks, the method to solve the problem is also different.

First and for most, When problem occurred, people always consider how to solve it. They may go the library to consult a number of books to learn how ancestor dealed with the same problem in old days. Although this can tell them some useful information, not all methods to problems people can find in books. Problems today are very different from the past, they have covered with many new elements. For example, when the car stops as you are driving what will you do? Go to library to see what the past people would do when they meet the same thing? Certainly not, these is no car in that day how people tell you what should you do?
If we all do things by learning ancestor then we may not have the secondary, robot and many other useful machines.
Last but not least, history is not always true. Sometimes they give us some inaccurate information. And in nowadays people pay more attention to the ability to innovate. If a person always copy others method to solve the problem, I don’t think he could be admired by his boss.
To sum up, sometimes we should understand the past to solve problems more perfect but we shouldn’t always look behind, because epoch is changing, knowledge is changing and all the things in world are changing ,the problem need us to use new method to solve it.

joyceliuUID: 2477232

In the recent years, there is a general controversy over the issue whether it is necessary for ( i  g! R; n* w9 n5 B+ g& B" C3 ]1 q people to understand the past when solve the problem present andfuture. Although some people claim that people should always lookbehind(retrospect to the past) and learn some useful experiences as they going ahead, and thiscan help them solve the problem easier. Personally,I think it is not necessary for people to understand the past, as theproblem exists now is different from that in old days, differentconditions determined how the problem itself looks, the method to solvethe problem is also different(distinctive). ; Q4 g6 P3 J. t0 V6 n0 H* y( \% b( \ Firstand for most, When problem occurred, people always consider how tosolve it. They may go the library to consult a number of books to learnhow ancestor dealed with the same problem in old days. (They may search in the library to find how our acestors deal with the similar problems.)Although thiscan tell (offer)them some useful information, not all methods to problemspeople can find in books. (it is unlikely to collect all the methods)Problems today are very different from thepast, they have covered with many new elements. For example, when thecar stops as you are driving what will you do? Go to library to seewhat the past people would do when they meet the same thing? Certainlynot, these is no car in that day how people tell you what should youdo? $ k' D1 A2 n- S' `&If we all do things by learning (from)ancestor then we may not have the secondary, robot and many other useful machines. $ H. @/ m2 Q% O" _1 S1 Y5 N. N% o Lastbut not least, history is not always true. Sometimes they give us someinaccurate information. And in nowadays people pay more attention tothe ability to innovate. If a person always copy others method to solvethe problem, I don’t think he could be admired by his boss.( I  think it is hard for him to succedd in the future. ) 8 a+ y- X  e' G$ y; ^3 i3 ~Tosum up, sometimes we should understand the past to solve problems moreperfect but we shouldn’t always look behind, because epoch is changing,knowledge is changing and all the things in world are changing,( everything is changing as time goes by)theproblem need us to use new method to solve it. , O, S! E* X/ x. T) J+ O8 ~4 ?  r( i0 k' T+ `  [ ) c1 ?7 K. p8 s' Y' H8 E7 R2 f& Z; r" K , d. V& N+ Z4 }# r" v+ A$ x# H1 K" Z 收藏分享评分

回复引用订阅报告道具TOP

wawabjUID: 2536676

In the recent years, there is a general controversy over the issue whether it is necessary for ! i( @+ s$ ~  M
people to understand the past when solve the problem present and future. Although some people claim that people should always look behind and learn some useful experiences as they going ahead, and this can help them solve the problem easier. Personally, I think it is not necessary for people to understand the past, as the problem exists now is different from that in old days, different conditions determined how the problem itself looks, the method to solve the problem is also different.（不同的观点呢）
\

\/ ~9 @; E! \
First and for most, When problem occurred, people always consider how to solve it. They may go the library to consult a number of books to learn how ancestor dealed with the same problem in old days. Although this can tell them some useful information, not all methods to problems people can find in books. Problems today are very different from the past, they have covered with many new elements. For example, when the car stops as you are driving what will you do? Go to library to see what the past people would do when they meet the same thing? Certainly not, these is no car in that day how people tell you what should you do? （这个例子感觉不太恰当）

If we all do things by learning ancestor then we may not have the secondary, robot and many other useful machines. " S0 D+ x- D3 I5 M
Last but not least, history is not always true. Sometimes they give us some inaccurate information. And in nowadays people pay more attention to the ability to innovate. If a person always copy others method to solve the problem, I don’t think he could be admired by his boss.; L; ]3 g, R" Y
To sum up, sometimes we should understand the past to solve problems more perfect but we shouldn’t always look behind, because epoch is changing, knowledge is changing and all the things in world are changing ,the problem need us to use new method to solve it.
（感觉这个文章没有展开。第二个论点尤其显得简洁。个人觉得作为issue的话，这样写肯定是不行的。但是IBT的作文的话，我不确定。）