12月3日综合作文

莘梓UID: 2732079

The speaker is against about the point that the painting Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet is not Rembrandt’s work by providing contradictory evidence to the reading.

To begin with, she says that we cannot judge the painting as a faked one by watching the way the woman dresses. The reason why the woman dresses inconsistant is that after hundreds of years some people painted the fur collar on the original painting to increase its value. Therefore, the listening opposes what the reading states that the work is not Rembrandt’s because the details were not noticed.

The second argument the speaker raised is that the light and shadow fit perfect in the original Rembrandt’s work once the new panited partis removed, so we cannot see it as an envidence that illustrates it is a fake painting as the reading says. The speaker says that on the original painting the woman wears a light color cloth, so the woman’s face should be illuminated as it is and the question raised by the reading is unconvicing.

Finally, the speaker claims that the panel of the painting made of glued pieces of wood cannot show it is not Rembrandt’s work. First, she says that some people used glued panel on this painting to increase its price and the original one was just painted on a single panel. Second, the pieces of wood of the original panel are from the same tree as one of Rembrandt’s work, Self Portrait with A Hat. Thus, it really casts doubt on the point in the reading that Rembrandt’s painting not on a glued panel as the reading says.

shiwei83UID: 2680950

The speaker is against about the point that the painting Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet is not Rembrandt’s work by providing contradictory evidence to the reading.

To begin with, she says that we cannot judge the painting as a faked one by watching the way the woman dresses. The reason why the woman dresses inconsistant is that after hundreds of years some people painted the fur collar on the original painting to increase its value. Therefore, the listening（用lecture比较好吧） opposes what the reading states that the work is not Rembrandt’s because the details were not noticed.

The second argument the speaker raised is that the light and shadow fit perfect in the original Rembrandt’s work once the new panited（painted） partis （been）removed, so we can not see it as an envidence（evidence） that illustrates it is a fake painting as the reading says. The speaker says that on the original painting the woman wears a light color cloth, so the woman’s face should be illuminated （by the light reflected）as it is and the question raised by the reading is unconvicing.

Finally, the speaker claims that the panel of the painting made of glued pieces of wood cannot show it is not Rembrandt’s work. First, she says that some people used glued panel on this painting to increase its price and the original one was just painted on a single panel. Second, the pieces of wood of the original panel are from the same tree as one of Rembrandt’s work, Self Portrait with A Hat. Thus, it really casts doubt on the point in the reading that Rembrandt’s painting not on a glued panel as the reading says.(感觉这一段的理由有点问题，其实与第一第二个原因有关，因为画被人加上了一些东西，所以尺寸变大了，因此panel的尺寸也必须相应变大，貌似你没有提到这一点)

总体上说你的文章论述得很简洁明了，结构也很清晰。但是感觉似乎每点的论述不够透彻，可以适当增加细节来支撑一下。（个人水平有限，意见仅供参考，大家共同提高，呵呵）