Using no limit as a limit—speedzshaw作文

speedzshawUID: 2556376

Do you agree or disagree that improving schools is the most important factor in successful development of country.

In era of rapid growth, every country would invest the best resources to its development emulating with other countries in case of falling behind. But what should be on the top list of the schedule? Some hold the view that improving school contributes the most to the successful development. As for me, I confess that improving school is an indispensible part and should be given enough attention, yet to guarantee continual growth of the country, various other factors could possibly take the privilege.

To leap off, admittedly, there’s no denying fact that improving school equals development of country to a certain extent. The quality and quantity of schools symbolize the education level of that country, the emphasis and importation of which definitely correlate to the perpetuation of any country, if taking a second look. Hutchins, the ex-president of Chicago University, defined the definition of higher education, announcing America’s great efforts invested into the departures from British practices. The United States then boasts the most prevalent universities in the world and is worthy of its name as superpower, Harvard, Stanford have long been desired by innumerable students all over the world, who in turn make up major forces in construction of America. And that was when America really took off.

Furthermore, much of country's science researches are being taken by academy led by certain professors, who themselves need funds to maintain their work. Modern facilities are in desperate need. Besides, schools are where to cultivate talents, which in turn are needed for the development of the country itself. Yet maybe numerous students lack access to receive formal education with the rationale of scarcity of schools. It certainly explains why no government would afford to leave improving schools to nothing.
Notwithstanding, schools only share a part of the country. Other factors including economy, military, technology, etc, collaborate to manifest in developing the country, which only improving school alone are unable to achieve. Economy growth lies in the key position to a country’s development, providing funds to every other factor. Besides, culture development still needs to be taken into account. In that case, improving schools is only an item in the schedule mentioned above.


In conclusion, of course, in order to develop the country, the government needs to take steps to improve schools to create better atmosphere for professors and students to absorb knowledge and make contribution. Yet, the country could never be able to survive without other infrastructural factors, especially economic growth. A joint hand of all these factors, or whatever, could be worthy of developing the country.

speedzshawUID: 2556376

题目：Teachers should not show their political or social views known in the classroom.

We are now living in a multi-diversified world than ever before, when distinctive views are not just tolerated but embraced. Yet whether or not to allow the teachers to express political or social views in class has caused wide public concern. From my perspective, I maintain that we need to treat the views differently.

First come to social views. In my opinion, teachers could exhibit tendencies towards the society they are inclined to their students. Students won't be students forever; they would eventually go into society in different roles. While in class, teachers could broaden the students’ horizons to more diversified lives by combining their own experiences and views they themselves hold towards the society and even set an example of, or at least provide some guidance how students should deal when confronting with similar situation. It would turn out to be rich wealth for students in later life. Besides, it's high time that social views assimilated into majors like societal science, economy, art, etc, no matter what majors students were in, class solely concentrating on knowledge on books is less able to attract and motivate students. So it would be conducive to the overall growth of students if teachers manage to show social views in class.

Yet as for political views, it'll be better not to introduce too much. First, politics itself is perplexed and complex, far beyond many students’ ability to recognize. As far as my knowledge is concerned, even teachers’ views are sometimes unworthy of scrutiny and even misleading. Furthermore, different countries have different political institutions. For instance, in China, a teacher who is prone to anti-party would be forbidden or even ostracized away from the school, while in America, even teachers in the same office would hold opposite views towards political party. One may be a Republican, another may be a Democrats. Facing such teachers if left unfettered, students would surely be befuddled about which to take. Thus it's unwise for teachers to show much political views.

As a matter of fact, whatever the teachers’ views would be, those are only their personal understanding towards the society or the policies. Students have their own rights to choose. Besides, what nowadays influence most does not come from political or social views of teachers in class, but from media. Students are relatively more vulnerable to views from media and of course are not averse to share their understandings with those who are identical to them. In this case, whichever side teachers would stand is less likely to have impacts on them. Only one thing to take into account might involve in the grades or ages of certain students. For university students, they should be encouraged to get closer to the society more frequently while for students from elementary schools, or upwards, too much concentration on such views might do a disservice or even be deleterious.

To conclude, teachers could be allowed to, while teaching in class, recommend certain political or social views, they only need to be consistent with the students' capacities of recognition. After all, finally it’s up to students to decide.

dairymanUID: 2683905

Teachers should not show their political or social views known in the classroom.
楼主必然是用的马甲，你这头像我见过
y; \! h" w0 f' w2 X" `
We are now living in a multi-diversified world than ever before, when distinctive views are not just tolerated but embraced. Yet whether or not to allow the teachers to express political or social views in class has caused wide public concern. From my perspective, I maintain that we need to treat the views differently.第一句灰常好，各种单词，后来发现原来类似模板，不表扬

First come to social views. In my opinion, teachers could exhibit tendencies towards the society they are inclined to their students. Students won't be students forever; they would eventually go into society in different roles. While in class, teachers could broaden the students’ horizons to more diversified lives by combining their own experiences and views they themselves hold towards the society and even set an example of, or at least provide some guidance how students should deal when confronting with similar situation.超级大长句，功底深啊，不过这个even set an example of我看可以删掉 It would turn out to be rich wealth for students in later life. Besides, it's high time that social views assimilated into majors like social science, economy, art, etc, no matter what majors students were in, class solely concentrating on knowledge on books is less able to attract and motivate students. So it would be conducive to the overall growth of students if teachers manage to show social views in class.: G/ `, w/ ~7 S! f6 I% X

Yet as for political views, it'll be better not to introduce too much. First, politics itself is perplexed and complex好表述, far beyond many students’ ability to recognize. As far as my knowledge is concerned, even teachers’ views are sometimes unworthy of scrutiny and even misleading. Furthermore, different countries have different political institutions. For instance, in China, a teacher who is prone to 好词组anti-party would be forbidden or even ostracized楼主必定是考g的无疑，不过ostracize是古语，最好别用 away from the school, while in America, even teachers in the same office would hold opposite views towards political party. One may be a Republican, another may be a Democrats. Facing such teachers if left unfettered, students would surely be befuddled about 相当不错which to take. Thus it's unwise for teachers to show much political views.1 a3 H9 k3 C5 o/ I7 W1 u
  `7 C4 E4 u3 G
As a matter of fact, whatever the teachers’ views would be, those are only their personal understanding towards the society or the policies. Students have their own rights to choose. Besides, what nowadays influence most does not come from political or social views of teachers in class, but from media. Students are relatively more vulnerable to views from media and of course are not averse to share their understandings with those who are identical to them. In this case, whichever side teachers would stand is less likely to have impacts on them. Only one thing to take into account might involve in the grades or ages of certain students. For university students, they should be encouraged to get closer to the society more frequently while for students from elementary schools, or upwards, too much concentration on such views might do a disservice or even be deleterious.相当漂亮! }  ~( k8 S) L( ~0 J
: x5 X% G% u9 J, i) b4 n! i
To conclude, teachers could be allowed to, while teaching in class, recommend certain political or social views, they only need to be consistent with the students' capacities of recognition. After all, finally it’s up to students to decide.
很无语，几乎是完美的一篇文章，逻辑思路清晰，语言华丽，内容丰富。充分体现出楼主明显是马甲
另：楼主aw理应4.5以上吧

speedzshawUID: 2556376

3# dairyman
澄清几个事实  不是马甲 我不用模板（始终坚持李小龙的思想 套路是没有任何用的，只会让你越陷越深） 不过我是考了G的
ostrasize来源我倒没注意 当时没太想到比较好的词 现在想想用shut out from已经可以吧

speedzshawUID: 2556376

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For successful development of a country, should a government focus its budget more on very young children education rather than on universities?

Education defines a country. Outstanding education is indispensible part of a successful country. Large amount of budget is spared to improve education, but debate over whether oriented on very young children or universities rages over across the world. Some argue that government should focus more on very young children education instead of universities. As for me, I hold the view that universities should have priorities to funds set for education, but where the emphasis of government be laid needs full consideration.

Admittedly, any governments that are blind to the education of very young children shall pay a heavy price and even at the expense of the future of their country. As an old saying goes, children are flowers of the country, they represent the future of the country, and are the same time supply line of talents for the construction of a country. Besides, cultural continuity within the context of the country is dependent on importation and perpetuation of children. Furthermore, no matter how much success this generation, universities students included, achieved, the torch of a country shall finally passed on to the next generation, namely the then very young children. Apart from that, education nowadays on very young children differs from what it used to be and is not confined to merely knowledge from books but as well as after-class activities, things like that. These activities serve useful purposes for the development of personal character, which in turn contributes to the social merit system. In that case, government can't afford to turn a deaf ear to the education of very young children.

Yet, it would give way to universities when compared importance with its ability to promote country. The very young children represent the future, universities students the current. Imagine that, could Hanging Garden really exist? Universities directly supply talents to their country. Science and social researches counts on professors and students on the campus. Largely, it should be modified into that university defines the country. The time the definition of higher education was illustrated and plan manifested over universities marked America’s skyrocketing. Another implicit merit of funding universities is that such universities continue to attract excellent students from all over the world, just as in America. Another thing we need to take into account is the actual costs of universities of course. Science researches and experiments, social surveys or investigations, all these add to the expenditure of universities. The university alone is hard to bear. So it's even more important to focus budget on universities.

Of course, to achieve successful development of a country, entirely focus on education is not enough, and sometimes misleading. As a whole, development of a country depends on overall development. Talking about budget, so where does it come from? Primarily, it's from economic growth, the factor itself also correlates to various other factors. The government should figure an outline of how funds should be allocated. .

From what has been discussed above, it's easy to conclude that in order for successful development of a country, funding education is pivotal, especially on universities, yet a careful planned collaboration of various other factors guarantees a successful country.

speedzshawUID: 2556376

TPO 8 综合写作

Recording early life and adventures, Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir enjoyed high population in historian, who used it as valuable source about European society in the 18th century. However, such population also subjected him to much controversy doubting the ingenuity of his memoir.

Just as an old saying goes, no man is perfect, the professor herself also believed in this, yet she still supported that accuracy of the memoir was reliable to a certain extent in following instances. First, she claimed that indeed Chevalier usually ran out of money on parties and gambling, yet he stayed good health. And at this time, he needed to transfer his assets into money on hand, which, then, would be quite a period. During this period, he had no choice but to borrow money from his friends to support his living.

Secondly, for the controversies over the accuracy of his conversation with Voltaire, the professor justified that evidences showed that Chevalier would put as much as he could remember down the night after the conversation and invariably took notes during the conversation. It's at least, more accurate than what critics criticize because evidences also showed that when writing the memoir, he consulted his notes and many journals many years later.

Last, professor mentioned that other prisoners in the same prison had much more powerful friends, according to the logic of what critics have questioned, that they should have been more able to escape from the prison. But none of them were ever recorded. She also suggested that old government document mentioned reparation of the ceiling of the jail. Thus, she questioned what else would result this, obviously only Chevalier's case.

speedzshawUID: 2556376

题目：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who do not work because they get enough money are rarely happy.

In a utilitarian society like this nowadays, an implicit consensus amongst people goes that the amount of money one possesses defines his success and his life. And people are inclined to feel fatigue about tedious work, desiring for a less laborious life. Then many people come to the conclusion that those who do not work yet with adequate money are usually happy, while still others strongly disagree. In my opinion, we need to treat the issue differently.

To leap off, life without work but only a lot of money would make people unhappy about their current situation. As an old saying goes, no pains, no gains. Sometimes people want to earn a living all by themselves, instead of just lavishing what's left for them. They want to make them worth. Besides, for those who fortunately acquires a coup, the life changes dramatically after that. In Japan, there was an unemployed man who won a huge amount of money from lottery, received endless ransom calls or letters, which ostensibly violated his order of life. Could anybody categorize him as happy? Being with lots of money but no work frustrated the man. So such kind of life is really prostrating sometimes.

Yet, as I mentioned above, in this society, money decides many things. With appropriate amount of money, you can deal with various phases of life. An access to education, sanitation would also add to joy of life. Besides, it would give many people a sense of superiority when possessing larger amount of money even jobless, which of course satisfies their vanities. Moreover, more time than needed, philanthropic deeds are always a choice. For instance, Bill Gates, even now retired from Microsoft, continues his charity on Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and transfers happiness to more people from the money he earned during his time as CEO. In terms of this, possession of certain amount of money is not always a bad thing.

What's more, another thing needs to be taken into consideration is that people may live an even difficult life without money. Once again from what’s been talked, in society like this, money is the ticket. People need money every now and then, without which one might even risk suffering from starvation and exposure. One step further, world economy is now hit by a recession. Increased price of product due to inflation shudder people's courage to support family, needless to say any entertainment or so. Consequently, it's better to have money than none.

To draw a conclusion, it's sometimes indeed troublesome to have enough money but no work, yet even more without anything. For those who fit the condition, they could find ways to make use of their time and money to make their life more enjoyable and worthwhile.

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

5# speedzshaw

你的这篇作文语言上没得说，用词和句子和很好。结构上我有点担心，因为T的作文要是写成优缺点都说就很危险，显得主次不明。我已经把你的作文给S修改了。他答应会好好看看的，回头我再贴上他的修改。

glly7UID: 2675646

2.23 by 小伙子

Mason.PDUID: 2592013

Recording early life and adventures, Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir enjoyed high population in historian, who used it as valuable source about European society in the 18th century. However, such population also subjected him to much controversy doubting the ingenuity of his memoir.

Just as an old saying goes, no man is perfect我觉得小作文不必加入自己的感情吧, the professor herself also believed in this, yet she still supported that accuracy of the memoir was reliable to a certain extent in following instances. First, she claimed that indeed Chevalier usually ran out of money on parties and gambling, yet he stayed good health.听力没听过。。 And at this time, he needed to transfer his assets into money on hand, which, then, would be quite a period. During this period, he had no choice but to borrow money from his friends to support his living.

Secondly, for the controversies over the accuracy of his conversation with Voltaire, the professor justified that evidences showed that Chevalier would put as much as he could remember down the night after the conversation and invariably took notes during the conversation. It's at least, more accurate than what critics criticize because evidences also showed that when writing the memoir, he consulted his notes and many journals many years later.第一个长句真漂亮。这一段没有详细陈述阅读的观点不知道是否可行8 X9 Q+ C& }6 [! L: H& k' p

# A/ q7 ?' f  H' G
Last, professor mentioned that other prisoners in the same prison had much more powerful friends, according to the logic of what critics have questioned, that they should have been more able to escape from the prison. But none of them were ever recorded. She also suggested that old government document mentioned reparation of the ceiling of the jail. Thus, she questioned what else would result this, obviously only Chevalier's case.

speedzshawUID: 2556376

10# Mason.PD
个人观点这个确实是我疏忽了 当时记笔记的时候就只记得教授说了个这个意思  我以后会注意的 谢谢~

speedzshawUID: 2556376

It’s better to use own knowledge and experience to solve question, or ask other people for advice.

Many people maintain that people who always ask the way won't get lost, while others disagree with the belief that god helps those who help themselves. Never had a consensus over whether to solve question all by oneself or recourse others for help. For my part, it needs case-by-case analysis of which serves better purpose.

Mostly, society requires people who are able to count on themselves to solve problems. No matter it is examination or application, where only personal performance counts, how could schools or corporations standardize on evaluating performances of students or employees? Also, it's a matter to reveal one's confidence, an opportunity to exhibit one's capability to make achievement. Through one's own knowledge and experience, one can obtain certain other elements which shall never be accessible to when asking for advice. Besides, even when they do encounter specific problem which is far beyond their abilities, others' suggestions only give a direction. For instance, when Bruce Lee taught his disciples, the only thing Bruce reiterated was that his understandings were only personal ones, they had to develop their own understanding and kept on putting that into practice, thus enhancing their opportunity in real combat. What's more, it may be even more misleading for a man to accept whatever is presented to him. In that case, counting on oneself assumes priority in person's development.

Nevertheless, there is still other time when asking for advice is indispensible. Just as an old saying which goes, no man is perfect, anyone has his limitations thus it's implausible for everyone to interpret everything and take measures properly. Sometimes, with more knowledge and experience, someone else's capacity far outweighs yours and their suggestion would provide much more insight into the plight you are in. Moreover, in a world now in much desperate need of cooperation nowadays, teamwork always causes wide public concern, yet one thing remains unchanged. Working for a purpose, people in one team should depend on each other and reinforce mutually. Admittedly, in one thousand people's eyes, there are one thousand Hamlets, whether it be incisive or futile, it's still far less readily when all advices for certain severe problem.

Yet still under more conditions, careful analysis should be made when determining to accept others' perceptions or completely by oneself. Just as what has been discussed above, problem itself may take precedence over the man's own capabilities. Only within the realm of his own ability could he possibly be able to keep his attention away from others' help and make full use of his knowledge and experience to manipulate. However, when beyond, asking for advice is a good choice. Even if accepting other people's advices, one needs to still look on them as guidance. For instance, on courts, a player would count on his own experience and knowledge to take advantage of every weakness his opponents display and every opportunity his teammates provide, yet when it comes to practice, it’s instructions from coach that would produce positive effects on improving the his skills. Consequently, one's own knowledge and experience together with other people's advice collaborate to ease difficulties and pave the way to success.

In conclusion, people are required, including ourselves, to be self-dependent on solving certain problems under certain circumstances to meet societal needs, while still other times, a combination between personal knowledge and experience as well as help coming from outside might be more feasible.

yqw8616UID: 2769928

注意单复数，还有拼写方面的一些问题，我觉得写得不错

It’s better to use own knowledge and experience to solve question, or ask other people for advice.

Many people maintain that people who always ask the way won't get lost, while others disagree with the belief that god helps those who help themselves. Never had a consensus over whether to solve question all by oneself or recourse others for help. For my part, it needs case-by-case analysis of which serves better purpose.   i8 J+ i! u) M! q1 ~

Mostly, society requires people who are able to count on themselves to solve problems. No matter it is examination or application, where only personal performance counts, how could schools or corporations standardize on evaluating performances of students or employees? Also, it's a matter to reveal one's confidence, an opportunity to exhibit one's capability to make achievement. Through one's own knowledge and experience, one can obtain certain other elements which shall never be accessible to when asking for advice. Besides, even when they do encounter specific problem which is far beyond their abilities, others' suggestions only give a direction. For instance, when Bruce Lee taught his disciples, the only thing Bruce reiterated was that his understandings were only personal ones, they had to develop their own understanding and kept on putting that into practice, thus enhancing their opportunity in real combat. What's more, it may be even more misleading for a man to accept whatever is presented to him. In that case, counting on oneself assumes priority in person's development. * {6 k4 X2 y) T/ ~5 K

Nevertheless, there is still other time when asking for advice is indispensible（indispensable）. Just as an old saying which goes, no man is perfect, anyone has his limitations thus it's implausible for everyone to interpret everything and take measures properly. Sometimes, with more knowledge and experience, someone else's capacity far outweighs yours and their suggestion would provide much more insight into the plight you are in. Moreover, in a world now in much desperate need of cooperation nowadays, teamwork always causes wide public concern, yet one thing remains unchanged. Working for a purpose, people in one team should depend on each other and reinforce mutually. Admittedly, in one thousand people's eyes, there are one thousand Hamlets, whether it be incisive or futile, it's still far less readily when all advices for certain severe problem. 8 _3 q/ i1 B4 z1 G) R* u
9 S% X4 M! |; Z  ~
Yet still under more conditions, careful analysis should be made when determining to accept others' perceptions or completely by oneself. Just as what has been discussed above, problem itself may take precedence over the man's own capabilities. Only within the realm of his own ability could he possibly be able to keep his attention away from others' help and make full use of his knowledge and experience to manipulate. However, when beyond, asking for advice is a good choice. Even if accepting other people's advices, one needs to still look on them as guidance. For instance, on courts, a player would count on his own experience and knowledge to take advantage of every weakness his opponents display and every opportunity his teammates provide, yet when it comes to practice, it’s instructions from coach that would produce positive effects on improving the his skills. Consequently, one's own knowledge and experience together with other people's advice collaborate to ease difficulties and pave the way to success. * Q! }" R& M! {9 W) e  W7 l
; m# F# Z! T  s$ x. S
In conclusion, people are required, including ourselves, to be self-dependent on solving certain problems under certain circumstances to meet societal needs, while still other times, a combination between personal knowledge and experience as well as help coming from outside might be more feasible.

yqw8616UID: 2769928

我用红色字体改的，好像看不出来，不过有括号

john_332UID: 2741978

It’s better to use own knowledge and experience to solve question, or ask other people for advice.

Many people maintain that people who always ask the way won't get lost, while others disagree with the belief that god helps those who help themselves. Never had a consensus (好词) over whether to solve question all by oneself or recourse(个人觉得用resort) others for help. For my part, it needs case-by-case analysis (地道的用法)of which serves better purpose(不错的表达).

Mostly, society requires people who are able to count on themselves to solve problems. No matter it is examination or application, where only personal performance counts, how could schools or corporations standardize on evaluating performances of students or employees? (前句从no matter开始到后面这个问句感觉有问题)Also, it's a matter to reveal one's confidence, an opportunity to exhibit ( 用present )one's capability to make achievement. Through one's own knowledge and experience, one can obtain certain other elements(词汇还是非常的丰富，羡慕) which shall never be accessible to when asking for advice. Besides, even when they do encounter specific problem which is far beyond their abilities, others' suggestions only give a direction. For instance, when Bruce Lee taught his disciples, the only thing Bruce reiterated was that his understandings were only personal ones, they had to develop their own understanding and kept on putting that into practice, thus enhancing their opportunity(提升他们的机会？) in real combat. What's more, it may be even more misleading for a man to accept whatever is presented to him. In that case, counting on oneself assumes priority in person's development.

Nevertheless, there is still other time when asking for advice is indispensible. Just as an old saying which goes, no man is perfect, anyone has his limitations thus it's implausible for everyone to interpret everything and take measures properly.(感觉上句表达有点不易理解) Sometimes, with more knowledge and experience, someone else's capacity far outweighs yours and their suggestion would provide much more insight into the plight you are in. Moreover, in a world now in much desperate need of cooperation nowadays(前句用了now 后面又用nowadays感觉重复，而且两个in所组成的结构读起来不地道，个人觉得：in a world where cooperation is strongly encouraged nowadays.), teamwork always causes wide public concern, yet one thing remains unchanged. Working for a purpose, people in one team should depend on each other and reinforce mutually(这两词是很好，但是搭配起来读起来很怪). Admittedly, in one thousand people's eyes, there are one thousand Hamlets, whether it be incisive or futile, it's still far less readily when all advices for certain severe problem.

Yet still under more conditions, careful analysis should be made when determining to accept others' perceptions or completely by oneself. Just as what has been discussed above, problem itself may take precedence over the man's own capabilities. Only within the realm of his own ability could he possibly be able to keep his attention away from others' help and make full use of (用得好)his knowledge and experience to manipulate. (上一句很漂亮，学习)However, when beyond, asking for advice is a good choice. Even if accepting other people's advices, one needs to still look on them as guidance. For instance, on courts, a player would count on his own experience and knowledge to take advantage of every weakness his opponents display and every opportunity his teammates provide, yet when it comes to practice, it’s instructions (好词) from coach that would produce positive effects on improving the his skills. Consequently, one's own knowledge and experience together with other people's advice collaborate to ease difficulties and pave the way to success.

In conclusion, people are required, including ourselves, to be self-dependent on solving certain problems under certain circumstances to meet societal needs, while still other times, a combination between personal knowledge and experience as well as help coming from outside might be more feasible.

文章挺不错的，有很多出彩的词汇、短语和句型。
但是个人感觉有很多可以一个简单句可以带过的地方，却拉长加了很多华丽的词汇，或句型在里面
使得意图复杂难辨，读起来有点累。