【Big Fish】03月08日Issue69--By Sansouci

SansouciUID: 2755036

Issue No.069

"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development."
今天头痛，硬憋出来的，见谅啊~

Whether scientific research and development should be restrict by government. The speaker claims not, as far as I am concerned, I agree insofar as government should give more substantiation on science development instead of limitations. Provide spacious imagination to scientist can create more fruits for abundant human’s life.

There is no denying that some scientific researches refer to social customs and ethics, which has a long-habituated in human history and deeply influence our daily lives, and government should give macroscopic administration. An example is aptly to illustrate this point. Clone, since the word wildly derived popularly from born of Doli Sheep-the first successful case of nucleus transplants on ewe. After that, clone technology gendered greatly disputable in scientific area. For the reason that whether clone technology should continuing exerts on human beings or human organ’s replica. Reference to a deluge of sphinx and complex issue, government of each nations of the world adopted effective measures to hold back colon sequence development. In case of severely interrupt human’s normal live order and contravene social customs and ethics.

However, most of scientific research and development has improved to human and society, so government should give more space on imaginations instead place restriction on science. For instance, On the other hand, the record of accomplishment is also impressive. Rural electrification programs have given hundreds of millions more people access to modern energy services. Many countries have successfully nurtured new energy industries, and environmental laws and standards have prompted the development of radically cleaner and more efficient technologies. Around the world, the amount of energy used and pollution generated to produce a dollar of wealth has declined steadily, even as quality of life and access to energy amenities has improved for large segments (though by no means all) of the world’s population.


What’s more, for some scientific research, government should offer sufficient resources and patronize to science development, which would be useful to improve human’s daily life and make sure future stable development. In 2010, China government emphasize in expertise field refer to Energy, Ecosystem, Agricultural, to provide opportunities for further study abroad and give much finance support who study in these major subjects. Obviously, it is strongly improving science development to burgeon and stable development because of government substantiate.

As it stands, in conclusion, the science picture will surely change—but, without policy intervention and technological innovation, not necessarily for the better. If the aim is to simultaneously improving environmental quality and protecting public health—governments will need to act now and technology will need to improve.

wowoyuweiweiUID: 2754055

Whether scientific research and development should be restrict(ed) by government. The speaker claims not, as far as I am concerned, I agree insofar as government should give more substantiation on science development instead of limitations. Provide spacious imagination to scientist can create more fruits for abundant human’s life.（比我写的好多了）
There is no denying that some scientific researches refer to social customs and ethics, which has a long-habituated in human history and deeply influence our daily lives, and government should give macroscopic administration. An example is aptly to illustrate this point. Clone, since the word wildly derived popularly from born of Doli Sheep-the first successful case of nucleus transplants on ewe. After that, clone technology gendered greatly disputable in scientific area. For the reason, that whether clone technology should continuing exerts on human beings or human organ’s replica. Reference to a deluge of sphinx and complex issue, government of each nations of the world adopted effective measures to hold back colon sequence development. In case of severely interrupt human’s normal live order and contravene social customs and ethics. （比我写的好多了，学习）
However, most of scientific research and development has improved to human and society, so government should give more space on imaginations instead place restriction on science. For instance, on the other hand, the record of accomplishment is also impressive. Rural electrification programs have given hundreds of millions more people access to modern energy services. Many countries have successfully nurtured new energy industries, and environmental laws and standards have prompted the development of radically cleaner and more efficient technologies. Around the world, the amount of energy used and pollution generated to produce a dollar of wealth has declined steadily, even as quality of life and access to energy amenities has improved for large segments (though by no means all) of the world’s population. （我觉得可以强调一下这例子与restrictions的关系，在论证一下）
What’s more, for some scientific research, government should offer sufficient resources and patronize to science development, which would be useful to improve human’s daily life and make sure future stable development. In 2010, China government emphasize in expertise field refer to Energy, Ecosystem, Agricultural, to provide opportunities for further study abroad and give much finance support who study in these major subjects. Obviously, it is strongly improving science development to burgeon and stable development because of government substantiate.（这个角度说的很好）
As it stands, in conclusion, the science picture will surely change—but, without policy intervention and technological innovation, not necessarily for the better. If the aim is to simultaneously improving environmental quality and protecting public health—governments will need to act now and technology will need to improve.

看了你的文章后，我觉得，政府对科研的限制可能有两个方面。一是对研究内容的，另一个是对研究经费、资料的。在前者来讲，不应限制过多，否则会影响科学家的研究，阻碍社会的进步。对后者， 国家应给与足够的支持，甚至对那些极有意义的事情应全力以赴。
这是我的，一点看法，欢迎讨论。
你的文章写得非常好，用词都很准确，而且没有什么错误。学习学习再学习。
继续努力吧：）