[Big Fish]3月10日Argument188 by-bobbiezz

BobbieZZUID: 2756583

TOPIC: ARGUMENT188 - A new report suggests that men and women experience pain very differently from one another, and that doctors should consider these differences when prescribing pain medications. When researchers administered the same dosage of kappa opioids-a painkiller-to 28 men and 20 women who were having their wisdom teeth extracted, the women reported feeling much less pain than the men, and the easing of pain lasted considerably longer in women. This research suggests that kappa opioids should be prescribed for women whenever pain medication is required, whereas men should be given other kinds of pain medication. In addition, researchers should reevaluate the effects of all medications on men versus women.
=======================================================================

This statement asserts that the feeling about pain between men and women are different, because several evidences of the experiment, the author gives an advance that researchers should offer different pain-staking to men and women. However, the speaker has show the experiment and it seems accurately at first sight, the evidences he/she offered have too insufficient to make his/her opinion stand as follow respects.

First of all, the example the experiment choices has several flaws. The quantity of women and men are different, the argument reflect on the men's number is more than the women's. In addition, the patients they choose may have different condition of teeth extracted. The women said they have less pain due to their circumstance are better than men have. So the author should provide the same members of patients and even gives more details about their states of illness and the examples should have similar situation.

Secondly, even if the situation among the people they choose to compare with, it could be unfairly assumes that the women have less pain than men have. It could not be considered based on the feeling that patients said, perhaps the painful is worse than men suffered, but women were lying instead told truth to researchers. Perhaps the pain which the men suffered was not worse like they described. To subsidize the really painful should be tested in apparatus of medical. As a result, the situation of painful of patients said have no sufficient evidence to support author's statement, but providing more accurately facts based on precise instrument.

Thirdly, even if the painful which women suffered worse than the men did, it cannot be true that given other kinds of pain-killer is correct and suitable to men. Perhaps other pain medication will have disadvantaged to people in other sides that doctors have ignored or not detected. By using other pain medication perhaps smooth painful suffered by people, but bring other worse illness such as gastritis, headache. Before offering men pain medical the doctor should have more details both sides of anodyne. So the author's suggestion cannot make his statement stand.

In sum, the author should provide more details about the examples which the experiment choose to compared with and the accurate evidences of the painful among people without lies. In addition, without no sufficient subsidization, he cannot make suggestion that give patient other pain-medications to release their teeth painful.