crazylu 的作文帖

crazyluUID: 2628382

3.22 （08.10.27NA）
Government should pay more attention to health care issues than on environment issues.

crazyluUID: 2628382

改到word里发给我word就行了，thx

Government should pay more attention to health care issues than on environment issues.

In my opinion, I fundamentally disagree with the assertion that the problem of health needs more care by government than the environment problem. Although health care issues are the basic problem which government should concern, compared with environment issues, I assert that government should put environment problem on the first place for the reasons as follows.

It is acknowledged that it is a dangerous time for our beautiful blue earth. With the development of technology, human beings have an unbelievable life which people living in 100 years ago cannot image. Whatever else may be said, most people would agree that the most exciting innovation in recent history is car. In the time without cars, it was long trip which may cost many days from Berlin to Roma, but any people can finish this trip in one day with the help of car. However, technology is a two side sword. Cars also take so much problem such as traffic jam and accidents, but the worst thing is the tail gas. There is no denying that our earth is becoming warmer and warmer, and some small islands maybe disappear many years later; scientists name of this phenomenon “greenhouse effect”. The tail gas is the major reason of this problem. We can image that if government will not spare no effort to restrict the numbers of cars, then the greenhouse effect cannot be controlled. Maybe in the near future, the amazing disaster in many science fiction movie such as "The Day After Tomorrow" and "2012" will actually happen in our life. We cannot emphasize the importance of protecting our environment too much by the way of reduce the tail gas. So the government must try its best to deal with this problem in order to save the earth.

Furthermore, environment problem is the reason of many illnesses. Here is a compelling example. My grandfather died 3 years ago because of cancer. He lived in a small village all his life. I still remember many years ago, when I was a little boy, although this small village was not rich enough, the scenery was so beautiful and every person looked very health. In summer, I always swam in the little river and hang out on the small mountain. The water in the river was so clear that I could see the bottom of the river clearly. The trees on the mountain were so green, and many birds sang the songs around them. What a wonderful picture! But everything changed after three factories were built 10 years ago for the reason that local government wanted to develop the economics. The river is becoming dark and smells bad. There are no trees on the mountain because they were all used by the factories. There is no doubt that this small village becomes richer at the expense of
pollution. What makes matters worse, the health of the people living in this village is not good. The same with my dear grandfather, many villagers suffer from cancer which is one of the desperate illnesses. If local government could think a little farther but not only care about their profits at present, this suicide development would never happen.

To sum up, all of human beings must realize that the environment problem is more important than before and it have a great influence on our life. As a powerful organization who can deal with this problem, government must put this problem on the first place and try to save our earth out of a deep hole as best as it can. It is not only for us, it is a big thing for our offspring.

yqw8616UID: 2769928

2# crazylu

不好意思，回来完了

crazyluUID: 2628382

3.25 （09.03.27）1 ^- H8 y0 ^8 A9 g7 M
Teachers should not show their political or social views known in the classroom.


改到word里发给我word就行了，thx

Teachers should not show their political or social views known in the classroom

In my view, I would like to say that I agree with the assertion that teachers can tell the students his or her perspectives about some political or social topics. Although some people think this will make some students absorb a lot of extreme views, as a result, these students will do a plenty of crazy things not only bad for them but for society. It is hard for me to believe these students can easily agree these extremely ideas. Furthermore, there are two benefits for teachers to express their views in the classroom.

It is hard for us to image a situation when a teacher is teaching, he or she should think very clearly before he or she says every sentence. It is universally acknowledged that the teachers' speaking costs most of time of a class.  In the class, if a teacher wants to show any information he or she knows to the students, and some political and social information is not hard to put out. After a teacher showing this kind of information, he or she must add his or her idea after it. What a normal progress! Consider of this, if we want teachers to teach better, maybe just normal, we should give them the rights of normal speaking and normal thinking.

The second benefit is students can develop their ability of thinking when their teachers express their political and social ideas. Different with other ways of getting political and social ideas from books, Internet or television, students can have a deeply talk with the people who show their ideas. Moreover, this kind of topics are not similar with other kind of topic without association with the things happened around us, some political and social topics can inspire people to concern everything happened in their life. All of this can make a great improvement for students to increase the ability of thinking.

On the other hand, we cannot deny the truth that it is harmful for students if their teachers try their best to make students accept their views. As a powerful side, it is not hard for teachers to force their students to agree with them. If this happened, we cannot believe what a terrible thing it is. For fear of this, we must give the students the rights to report their teacher.

All in all, we should permit teachers show their attitude on the premise that we also allow their students to report their obsessive behavior.

crazyluUID: 2628382

不好意思，写成昨天的作业了，等会我在交上今天的作业哈

crazyluUID: 2628382

3.26 (08.11.7NA)
For successful development of a country, should a government focus its budget more on very young children education rather than on universities?

改到word里发给我word就行了，thx

For successful development of a country, should a government focus its budget more on very young children education rather than on universities?

Whatever else may be said, most people would agree that the level of education decides the future of the country. There is no denying that many advanced countries in this world also have better level of education than a plenty of development countries. As a government, in order to have a wonderful future, it should pay more attention to education. When it comes to the problem that the fundamental education or the undergraduate education which should be put at the first place, a government should take action according to the situation of itself.

If a country's young children education is better than their universities, this country cannot neglect its higher education. The reasons are stated as follows. The first reason I want to say is the education in universities decides the abilities of top persons in this country. Different with basic schools, the people who have chance to go to the universities are the survivors of passing a lot of difficult exams. As a result, it is universally admitted that their ability are better than others. In order to promote them to a higher lever, higher education should be better. The second reason is that there are a plenty of research institutes in universities. It is so hard for us to imagine a situation that these institutes can make great achievements without abundant money.

On the other hand, the country which is having a better education in universities than in basic schools also needs to pay attention their fundamental schools. Firstly, different with higher schools, the number of people in basic schools is much more than the number in higher schools. The level of fundamental education is much connected with the quality of this country. It is so dangerous for a country only care about the intelligent people but neglects most of normal persons. Secondly, a government cannot focus on all of basic schools instead of universities. There are amount of basic schools locating in poor places even some schools only have one teacher but hundreds of students. For the future of these poor children and fine teachers, the government should give more money to these schools.

All in all, as an old saying goes:" one thousand readers, one thousand Hamlets." The education in basic schools or in the universities which should be given more money decides by the practical situations of the country.

caoxuemeiUID: 2629828

附件。共勉吧。我觉得最大的问题是没有内容。语法什么的都放在其次吧，先把例子补充一下吧。

crazyluUID: 2628382

3.29    Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? More money should be invested by the government on improving access to the Internet, rather than public transportation.

crazyluUID: 2628382

改到word里发给我word就行了，thx

crazyluUID: 2628382

3.30 （09.2.21）
Newspapers and magazines are the best way of learning about a foreign country.
改到word里发给我word就行了，thx

crazyluUID: 2628382

帮国宝姐姐占位

crazyluUID: 2628382

多谢国宝姐姐啦

mpromanusUID: 2565872

14# crazylu

Renewable resources of energy (sun, wind, water) will soon replace the old resources of fossil fuels (gas, oil and coal), agree or disagree?

With the development of our society, our human beings need more and more energy to be used. Different with from traditional resources of fossil fuels such like gas, oil and coal, we (If you use this construction, the subject of this sentence is 'we', therefore the 1st part of the sentence also uses 'we' as the subject, which means you're writing 'we are different from traditional resources of fossil fuels..', while what you actually meant to express is that the energy resources we have now are different. To that end, the subject needs to be the energy resources. Please pay attention to clarity in sentences.) have some new energy resources such like the sun, wind and water. What is the most important, this kind of new energy has much difference with our old energy resources (Gas, oil and such are not 'energy' in themselves. They are SOURCES of energy. Same for all occurences of 'energy' that should have been 'energy resources/sources'.) for many reasons. In my view, I actually believe that the energy resources we have used for almost hundreds of years will be replaced (The question is not ONLY about whether the traditional energy resources will be replaced. It's about whether they'll be SOON replaced.) by the renewable resources. The reasons are stated as follows.

First and foremost, we cannot emphasize???? (I think you missed  the 'not enough' part of this phrase.) the importance of the renewability of new energy. Although there are still numerous fossil fuels in our earth, we cannot deny that all of them will be used up sooner or later. As a result, in order to obtain these treasured energy, manifold countries take part in fighting for it, and the relationships of between some countries come to the side brink ('To the brink of something' is a fixed phrase. If that's not what you want to express, consider 'state'.) of war. In a not similar way??, we do not need to scramble for the new energy because of the ability of renewability. For example, the energy of sun is the gift which that God gives to human, and it is universally acknowledged that solar energy is unlimited. New energy is also easy to get than old energy which needs high advanced technology to achieve it. All in all, human beings must take actions to make full use of this unlimited energy.

The second season I want to say as an advantage of using the new energy is that it does not produce any pollution. There is no doubt that so many pollution problems such like the green house effect and unusual weather are caused by these fossil fuels. For example, I still remember that the winter was so cold in my hometown in 10 years ago. But now the temperature in the winter is as high as the temperature in the spring before, for the reason that many factories moved to our village in during the recent 10 years. At the even worse, the sky was not as blue as before and no one wants to swim in the dirty river now. It is obvious that all of these are the effect of the unlimited use of fossil fuels. On the contrary, we never need to mind whether the new energy can cause this problem. To sum up, for the future of our earth and our offsprings, our human beings (You're trying to translate 我们人类, aren't you?) should spare no effort to use new energy.

Because of these two reasons, we must admit that there are so many advantages to use renewable resources of energy to take the place of the old resources of fossil fuels. In a nutshell, Nobody want the terrible disasters that happened in the movies??? (Did you say anything about the movies in the essay?) to occur in our true real life.

总结：

你的语法和表达都非常中式，很累赘，而且用词很不恰当，经常是抓到一个意思是那么回事儿的词，不要说合适与否，连词性都不管就用上去。从句的句法也非常混乱。

论述方面是典型的优缺点式跑题，因为题目不光是要你论述可再生能源代替化石燃料，还要你特别论述可再生能源是不是会很快取代化石燃料，但你的文章全篇包括开头结尾都在写可再生能源的优点。。你可以说因为有很多优点所以可再生能源会很快取代化石燃料，但你不能停留在优点上，必须把这个因为所以解释完整。论述文的目的是说明题目要你说明的东西，而不是说不论什么题目只要抓住主要名词说一下优缺点就可以了。