issue17 法律 7.10 by gypsophila

追梦小木耳UID: 2781857

17"There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."

什么是law? legal document setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity不论是公正的还是不公正的法律，都是为了维护社会秩序而存在的。不论法律在人们心中是公平还是不公平，都要遵守。 （1）判断法律的公正与否并没有明确的标准。如果大家都根据自己的判断去选择遵守还是不遵守，法律就失去了意义，导致社会混乱 （2）要抵制不公平的法律仅靠不遵守是不够的。现代社会如果不遵守就会受到惩罚；个人的力量太小，没有影响力；应通过其他手段如示威游行改变

Word 530

Laws are set to regulate every individual’s behavior and activity in order to guarantee the order of society. Regardless whether they are viewed to be just or not, they should be obeyed by all the citizens.

As views of justice vary from person to person, it is quite difficult to define the type of a law. A just law in one’s eyes, which seems to maintain the benefit of all citizens, could be unfair to other groups of people. Even the most beneficial ones could suffer rebukes of lacking equity. We may cite a single example of the laws that limit the pollution produced by industrial companies, which must be regard just by most individuals, since they aim to protect the environment. However, the consumers would hold the opposite opinion because they have to pay more for the products owing to the fees that are used to reduce the pollution are added to the costs. The producers would also object to the rules since the higher prices could reduce the amount of customers.

In addition, if every one was deciding whether or not to follow the laws according to his judgment, there would be a soaring rate of crime, and the society therefore would be running limitlessly. For instance, the rich people may think it unjust for them to pay high taxes, while the poor, who are unemployed or homeless, can enjoy the free accommodation provided by the government. If they disregard and resist the tax laws, where will the government’s money come from? There are tremendous possibilities that the poor have to make a living by stealing, robbing and even killing, and these crimes are believed to be just and reasonable by the poor. Therefore, our society would hardly maintain peace if people are encouraged to violate laws of which they think lacking equity.

Even though one insists that one law is unjust and must be modified, it is not wise for him to resist the law by disobeying it. In modern society, every behavior against laws will bring about punishment and the judge would certainly not evaluate the criminal’s prospective of the law while sentencing upon him. Besides, every individual’s crime can not appeal to attention in society. On the contrary, the more crimes are committed, the severer the punishments will be. For these reasons, other sensible tactics should be adopted to fight against the injustice of laws. Such tactics may include demonstrating or writing articles to call for public attention. Our society is filled with such examples as the government of Belgium modified the law after seeing the movie Rosetta, in which a 18-year-old girl was struggling hard to support her poor family, in order to protect the rights of teenagers.

To conclude, there exists no sense to emphasis that the citizens should resist and disregard laws that they consider to be unjust, not only due to the vague definition of just or unjust laws, but also for the weak function of single individuals. The premature resistance and violence would consequently lead to the disorder of society and therefore, sever punishments. In order to improve the justice of laws, other legitimate and rational measures should be considered.

maraschino1985UID: 2846549

改好了~

colin8741UID: 2835824

为什么一看到issue我就不会改了……语法问题我就忽略了（反正也没找出来……）
举例论证很多很好，这点我就想不到
我觉得总体思想什么的都差不多，完全不像argu一样具有可改性……
总之，感觉很不错

gtjohnUID: 2813321

[这篇我不知道怎么入手写，来看看你的]

Laws are set to regulate every individual’s behavior and activity in order to guarantee the order of society. Regardless whether they are viewed to be just or not, they should be obeyed by all the citizens.
[TS不管公正不公正，都要遵守]

As views of justice vary from person to person, it is quite difficult to define the type of a law. A just law in one’s eyes, which seems to maintain the benefit of all citizens, could be unfair to other groups of people. Even the most beneficial ones could suffer rebukes[是不是condemn意思，这次好难啊] of lacking equity. We may cite a single example of the laws that limit the pollution produced by industrial companies, which must be regard just by most individuals, since they aim to protect the environment. However[however听说要慎用，除非之后的内容很关键，这里看看是不是用while，on the contrary就好了], the consumers would hold the opposite opinion because they have to pay more for the products owing to the fees that are used to reduce the pollution are added to the costs. The producers would also object to the rules since the higher prices could reduce the amount of customers.
[讲对于不同人，同样的法律他们会有不同的看法。是不是可以深入讨论下引起的原因是什么，是利益关系，是价值观念，是社会道德还是什么。感觉这样会比较深刻一点，也便于后面展开论证]

In addition, if every one was deciding whether or not to follow the laws according to his judgment, there would be a soaring rate of crime, and the society therefore would be running limitlessly. For instance, the rich people may think it unjust for them to pay high taxes, while the poor, who are unemployed or homeless, can enjoy the free accommodation provided by the government. If they disregard and resist the tax laws, where will the government’s money come from? There are tremendous possibilities that the poor have to make a living by stealing, robbing and even killing, and these crimes are believed to be just and reasonable by the poor. Therefore, our society would hardly maintain peace if people are encouraged to violate laws of which they think lacking equity.
[这一段给我的感觉是，是不是把just和reasonable的界限模糊了。大家都来交税，交的税被政府官员拿去海皮了这个是unjust，用来造福老板姓了是just，钱多多交，钱少少交哪里unjust了？换个角度，富人哪天落魄了也是可以拿救济金的，所以我觉得之所以他们有意见，是税率。觉得交太多了，觉得不合理而不是不公平。认为杀人是just是心理有问题了，太极端了]

Even though one insists that one law is unjust and must be modified, it is not wise for him to resist the law by disobeying it. In modern society, every behavior against laws will bring about punishment and the judge would certainly not evaluate the criminal’s prospective of the law while sentencing upon him. Besides, every individual’s crime can not appeal to attention in society. On the contrary, the more crimes are committed, the severer the punishments will be. For these reasons, other sensible tactics should be adopted to fight against the injustice of laws. Such tactics may include demonstrating or writing articles to call for public attention. Our society is filled with such examples as the government of Belgium modified the law after seeing the movie Rosetta, in which an 18-year-old girl was struggling hard to support her poor family, in order to protect the rights of teenagers.
[不要违法，通过其他途径很同意。例子是不是解释的不太清楚？]

To conclude, there exists no sense to emphasis that the citizens should resist and disregard laws that they consider to be unjust, not only due to the vague definition of just or unjust laws, but also for the weak function of single individuals. The premature resistance and violence would consequently lead to the disorder of society and therefore, sever punishments. In order to improve the justice of laws, other legitimate and rational measures should be considered.

[由于专业的问题我对法律这个东西没有太多概念，所以思绪很乱无从下笔。感觉这类话题一定要深刻才行。很多人写这篇用到马丁路德金，所涉及的社会问题比这篇表达的要深入很多。写文章引起社会注意的例子太多啦，不公平还是不公平。所以更深入的探讨我觉得还是必要的]

[欢迎指正]

追梦小木耳UID: 2781857

5# gtjohn
谢谢你帮我改作文哦！
这只是我的第二篇issue，有很多很多毛病，改的人都有说例子不是很合适，我后来想想也确实是自己说的不够严密。
对法律我也是一知半解，了解不多~
大家说的意见我都会吸取的！

gtjohnUID: 2813321

6# 追梦小木耳
第二篇写得比我好多了。。。
你标题貌似不符合规则，不改改又要被锁了

追梦小木耳UID: 2781857

7# gtjohn
谢谢哈~刚知道发帖还有格式~