- 最后登录
- 2011-4-17
- 在线时间
- 41 小时
- 寄托币
- 1532
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-4-29
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 16
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1608
- UID
- 207550
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1532
- 注册时间
- 2005-4-29
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 16
|
Citing three pieces of evidence, a phenomenon, a national study and a survey, the author assumes that violent behavior of teenager is mainly traceable to a great number of violent shows. Therefore, he or she concludes that it is necessary to reduce the amount of violence shown during prime time so as to low the rate of teenage crime in Alta. The conclusion seems logical based on such evidence. However, the evidence cannot support the assumption after careful analyze.
To begin with, any evidence the author brings forward is the situation of national areas rather than Alta. Thus, Alta may not have the characters those pieces of evidence showed Perhaps the economy level in Alta is so low that television sets only appear in few families. Or perhaps even television sets in Alta are indeed usual, the programs are few violence shows. Or perhaps although violence shows are common, the local rate of teenager committed is still low so Alta may have few teenager crime problems. Any possibility would undermine the conclusion the author gives.
Moreover, have you noticed that the author said the phenomenon has happened since the 1950? Does the whole population increase? Does the whole rate of crime grow? Also, do people’s life style change? Whether teenagers in today are more mature and bold in(than) those in old time? Do their new characters make them easy to crime? The author fails to consider these questions which can renew the explanation of the phenomenon. Furthermore, teenagers involved in a special time to grow up whose behaviors are greatly affected not only by personal characters, but also family environment and their friends characters Common sense tells us that people would like to imitate others. Thus, factors mentioned above make the conclusion unpersuasive.
Finally, except that the result of the survey cannot typify that in Alta, it also has many problems. We are informed neither the number of people who participate in this survey nor the number of respondents. Perhaps there are not enough people sampled to typify the opinion of whole people, or perhaps only few people who have interested in this topic give the response. Moreover, parents indicate the prime-television should show less violence program. However, the author provides no information that prime-television showed much violence program or teenagers always watch the prime-television. Without ruling out those possibilities, the author cannot convince me that the violence program has directly relationship with the rate of teenagers’ crimes.
这一段感觉有些混乱呀,moreover之前说的是survey的可信度,接下来的两句又说的是prime-television,最后的结论又是violence program 和 the rate of teenagers’ crimes没有多大关系.感觉上这一段其实可以分开来做两段写.In conclusion, as mentioned all above, the evidence given cannot support the conclusion at all. To better evaluate, the author should analyze that situation only in Alta, such as the residence economy level, the rate of teenagers’ crimes and the content of local program. The author should also do a local study and a local survey. Thus, he or she can definitely get the convincible conclusion in the end.
ps.你在改我的文章时说可以加一段来写出其他解决这个问题的方案,有必要这样吗,毕竟我们只是要批驳作者的观点啊.
[ Last edited by tianrushui on 2005-8-8 at 15:01 ] |
|