寄托天下
查看: 1514|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue144 G-89-互助社-19日写作 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
682
注册时间
2004-12-21
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-8-19 16:14:02 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
限时没写完 差最后一段 之后中间加了个例子 补了结尾 唉
估计要重在参与了

Issue144:  429 words  45 minutes  475  504

It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value.
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

提纲
1 同意
2 艺术家创造了价值
3 批评家帮助了解作品的价值
4 有时批评家误解作品,给艺术家带来不好的影响
5 结尾

I fundamentally agree with the speaker that it is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of enduring value. Meanwhile, critics make their effort to let people apprehend the masterpiece more profoundly and more clearly. Yet, because of the time or the critic own problems, some pieces of art works encounter unfair treatment.

Nowadays, a lot of artists are well-known for their masterpieces, which gives society the lasting values. The famous painting of Picasso, Guernica, which is the representative of cubism, expresses the pain and sorrow of the innocent people who lived in the little town, Guernica, when they suffered the bombing of the autocracy government, Nazi German. This work shows us the cruelty and the distorted spirit of the autocrat. It is the best painting which memorizes the people who died in the autocracy countries and the ones who fought for the freedom and equal rights of all the people. Another work, Eroica, the third symphony of Beethoven’s, which was composed for the hero, Napoleon, in it Beethoven portray a scene where the hero leads his troops fight against the enemy. The work was treated as one of the representatives of his works. Thereby, it is the artist who expresses some lasting value in their works.

On the one hand, the critic who evaluates the works of artists, and gives the proper critique of them, helps the common people understand the meanings of masterpieces of famous artists. As a normal person, without some professional training of aesthetical view, mostly it is hard of them to recognize the merits of such works. Like the representative work of surrealism, Persistence of Memory, which is created by Dali, it expresses a view of dream, and the distorted clocks in it reveal some meanings. Without the critic, these meanings of the picture are hard to comprehend for normal people. Therefore, the critic plays an important role in expressing the value of artists’ works.

On the other hand, the critic is not the artist himself or herself, sometimes the meaning of the work may be explained wrongly, even worse, some masterpieces were treated as rubbish, without the right appreciation, the destiny of artists and their works are in tragedy. The best example is the sorrowful artist, Van Gogh, who only sold one of his paintings in his living days, yet, after his death, his works became some of the dearest masterpieces. His works did not win the favor of critic, and no one was willing to praise his works, and nobody could enjoy the merits of them. That means the critique itself should be carefully evaluated. As mentioned above, sometimes the critique makes negative influence on the artist’s work.

To conclude, the critic could help more to understand the merits of masterpieces, and to some extent the critic may mistake the meaning of them, to this, people should be careful. And the one who creates the lasting value is the artist; they express the spirits and characters of the world, and win the honor of people.

[ Last edited by huangdao on 2005-8-19 at 16:17 ]
武汉  89489392
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
818
注册时间
2005-7-12
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2005-8-22 11:47:13 |只看该作者
I fundamentally agree with the speaker that it is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of enduring value. Meanwhile, critics make their effort to let people apprehend the masterpiece more profoundly and more clearly. Yet, because of the time or the critic own problems病句, some pieces of art works encounter unfair treatment.

Nowadays, a lot of artists are well-known for their masterpieces这一句多余, which gives society the lasting values.你再好好想想中心句要怎么表达才好 The famous painting of Picasso, Guernica, which is the representative of cubism, expresses the pain and sorrow of the innocent people who lived in the little town, Guernica, when they suffered the bombing of the autocracy government, Nazi German. This work shows us the cruelty and the distorted spirit of the autocrat. It is the best painting which memorizes the people who died in the autocracy countries and the ones who fought for the freedom and equal rights of all the people. Another work, Eroica, the third symphony of Beethoven’s, which was composed for the hero, Napoleon, in it Beethoven portray a scene where the hero leads his troops fight against the enemy. The work was treated as one of the representatives of his works. Thereby, it is the artist who expresses some lasting value in their works.

On the one hand, the critic who evaluates the works of artists, and gives the proper critique of them, helps the common people understand the meanings of masterpieces of famous artists. As an normalordinary person, without some professional training of aesthetical view, mostly it is hard of them to recognize the merits of such works. Like the representative work of surrealism, Persistence of Memory, which is created by Dali, it expresses a view of dream, and the distorted clocks in it reveal some meanings. Without the critic, these meanings of the picture are hard to comprehend for normal people. Therefore, the critic plays an important role in expressing the value of artists’ works.

On the other hand, the critic is not the artist himself or herself, sometimes the meaning of the work may be explained wrongly, or even worse, some masterpieces were treated as rubbish, without the right appreciation, the destiny of artists and their works are in tragedy. The bestOne compelling example is the sorrowful artist, Van Gogh, who only sold one of his paintings in his living days, yet, after his death, his works became some of the dearest masterpieces. His works did not winearn才是地道的用法 the favor of critic, and no one was willing to praise his works, and nobody could enjoy the merits of them.这一句的三个分句讲的都是一个意思,你试着翻译成中文看看,很搞笑。 That means the critique itself should be carefully evaluated. As mentioned above, sometimes the critique makes negative influence on the artist’s work.

To conclude, the critic could help more to understand the merits of masterpieces, and to some extent the critic may mistake the meaning of them, to this, people should be careful. And the one who creates the lasting value is the artist; they express the spirits and characters of the world, and win the honor of people.

你的语言表达不够简洁有力,建议多多看范文。论点很一般,论证不深刻,强烈建议背诵老外280。
我说话有点损,不要被我打击到了,加油:)

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
0
寄托币
2315
注册时间
2005-8-19
精华
1
帖子
6
板凳
发表于 2005-8-22 12:03:39 |只看该作者
以在下拙见,我们是不是应该多focus一些 lasting这个词呢?
我认为否认评论家的价值是不容易的,但他们是否能给于社会一些长久的价值就很值得讨论。我的论点是那些有长久价值的东西来源于艺术家,评论家对于这些长久的价值基本上是没有贡献的。但我不是很清楚题中society这个词的重要性。
我的文章:
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
可以的话互相讨论一下:)

使用道具 举报

RE: issue144 G-89-互助社-19日写作 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue144 G-89-互助社-19日写作
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-322688-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部