issue153 G-89-互助社-21日 （已用WORD修改红绿线，高频，请各位高手拍砖、交流）

fantasianosUID：207837

As the wheel of human culture turns at its accelerating and eternal velocity into 21st century, education, the building block of culture, has attracted much attention. The way to study, like the map guide education, has been one of the most controversial subjects discussed by individuals. Skepticism, though not new to a part of persons, has just been realized essentially for a not long time. In the circumstance of academic freedom, a perspective held by a portion of people suggests that students ought to bring certain skepticism to whatever they learn instead of accepting it passively.

Long enveloped in the atmosphere of passive learning, the backwater of education has welcomed the coming of its fresh spring, skepticism finally. An ancient great educator in China named Confucius said thousands of years ago that "learning without thought is labor lost". Similarly, accepting without skepticism is labor lost. When a student faces a new theory or theorem, what her or his most probable action is to say "yes, it seems correct" and just keep it in mind, while it is usually advised to doubt about it.

To skepticize in study does not mean to say no to anything the student meets. Instead, it should be the scientific skepticism, which contains a process of understanding what is told about the new thing, the ground it based on, which way can be utilized to prove or disprove it, and in the end the student's own perspective with corresponding evidences. If a student doubt about anything she or he meets, unable to judge the validity of it, the world may seem to her or he so undecidable that there is no difference between the person and an agnostic.

Considering those academic knowledge needed, nevertheless, an average student may not be able to carry out a scientific suspicion per se. In this case, the person can turn to those trustworthy experts to get an answer.

If a student is so interested in a certain subject, yet with neither the ability at present to check it by herself or himself nor trust on those experts that she or he is still determined to prove or disprove by her or his own effort, a more suitable choice for this student is that to learn knowledge needed for a period of time, no matter long or short, and then with what she or he gets to solve those problems about the exact subject.

In the course of 21st century, education has been of more and more importance than before, which makes skepticism a frequently talked title in people's daily chatting. Despite the usual realization with the term "skepticism" as question all things appearing, a sensible skepticism includes academic items, setting barricade in the students' way of choosing to be for or against one certain theory or thought.

polymathUID：179557

先帮你顶一个！改了I-157再来！:)

fairy115UID：200324

As the wheel of human culture turns at its accelerating and eternal velocity into 21st century, education, the building block of culture, has attracted much attention. The way to study, like the map guide education, has been one of the most controversial subjects discussed by individuals. Skepticism, though not new to a part of persons, has just been realized essentially for a not long time. In the circumstance of academic freedom, a perspective held by a portion of people suggests that students ought to bring certain skepticism to whatever they learn instead of accepting it passively第一句话我觉得离题有点远，后面连着两句的句式有些类似，改改也许更好！）Long enveloped in the atmosphere of passive learning, the backwater of education has welcomed the coming of its fresh spring, skepticism finally. An ancient great educator in China named Confucius said thousands of years ago that "learning without thought is labor lost". Similarly, accepting without skepticism is labor lost. When a student faces a new theory or theorem, what her or his most probable action is to say "yes, it seems correct" and just keep it in mind, while it is usually advised to doubt about it. 不知是不是我的理解问题?我觉得你得ts和后面不太吻合？我感觉你的ts强调的是一种对比，随时间推移的变化？
To skepticize in study does not mean to say no to anything the student meets. Instead, it should be the scientific skepticism, which contains a process of understanding what is told about the new thing, the ground it based on, which way can be utilized to prove or disprove it, and in the end the student's own perspective with corresponding evidences. If a student doubt about anything she or he meets, unable to judge the validity of it, the world may seem to her or he so undecidable that there is no difference between the person and an agnostic.

Considering those academic knowledge needed, nevertheless, an average student may not be able to carry out a scientific suspicion per se. In this case, the person can turn to those trustworthy experts to get an answer.

If a student is so interested in a certain subject, yet with neither the ability at present to check it by herself or himself nor trust on those experts that she or he is still determined to prove or disprove by her or his own effort, a more suitable choice for this student is that to learn knowledge needed for a period of time, no matter long or short, and then with what she or he gets to solve those problems about the exact subject.

In the course of 21st century, education has been of more and more importance than before, which makes skepticism a frequently talked title in people's daily chatting. Despite the usual realization with the term "skepticism" as question all things appearing, a sensible skepticism includes academic items, setting barricade in the students' way of choosing to be for or against one certain theory or thought.
我觉得你后面的逻辑有一点点混乱。。。呵呵。。。水平有限。。。仅供参考：
1．        你的逻辑似乎是：学习需要质疑---过分质疑也不行---面对专业，普通学生没有能力质疑，需要权威---如果不是上面两种，就暂时学点现期需要的。
2．        这几点之间你没有明确的逻辑关系，比如递进或者并列？即使有，你没有明确的表达出来
3．        逻辑有漏洞：没有能力质疑就听从权威吗？也许可以抱着怀疑的态度接受阿，然后再实践中检验，检验不需要很多理论吧。第二，学习现在需要的一样会遇到接受或不接受的问题吧？那么这些人用什么态度来面对现期知识呢？
4．        最后觉得你的文章缺乏例子

fantasianosUID：207837

谢谢
我说的听从权威是说：听从你认为可信的，如果实在不信又有兴趣的话就自己补充知识，然后自己验证
是我表达的问题，还是你仍然觉得不妥呢？恳请指教