issue10 ...fantasy小组。。。必回拍。。

foreveraUID: 202035

10. "Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated."


1．        承认的确在边远的小城市也保留有大量的文化遗产。
2．        但是大城市里应该有几乎这个国家所有文化的精粹，保护大城市的cultural tradition是最有效率的。
3．        而且小城市更倾向与墨守成规，而大城市里由于国际交往比较多人们的思路比较开阔，也更容易generate cultural tradition。
4．        不得不指出大城市的thriving process会影响一些最普通的，不值得放进博物馆的cultural tradition东西。所以政府需要做的是普及民众对本国文化的认同和理解，让公众自发的从内心里保护文化，继承文化。



Should governments focus their financial budget on the major cities which is thriving? And do major cities preserve and generate the very nations’ cultural traditions and customs? Facing this complex issue, any extreme responses, without systematic analysis, would be improper. And, as far as I am concerned, the governments, guaranteeing that all small sized cities are well financed, should focus their limited budget more on major cities to preserve the nations’ cultural traditions efficiently.

To begin with, as to cultural traditions, what major cities maintain are the most centralized, thus, the protections in major cities, especially major cultural centers, are the most efficiently. In ancient times, the emperors called for great amounts of skilled workers to present them all valuable, artistic, and funny things in the country which are called cultural possessions today, such as paintings, gardening art, architectures, etc. In other words, it is a centralized process. In this process, the major cities are endowed with the most splendid cultural wealth and traditions. All these cultural possessions, which are now maintained most in museums, reflect most part of the traditions. Under this circumstance, protection of cultural wealth in major cities enables the limited cultural budget of governments work efficiently. For instance, the imperial palace in China preserves most of Chinese cultural traditions and artistic wealth.


What’s more, big cities have more possibility to generate new cultural tradition s and customs than cities lying on the edge. As for more opportunities of national communication, people in major cities have wide and flexible thinking methods. Consequently, putting traditional culture and the most popular mind into consideration, the very group of people would create some new life styles which are convenient to them. If the life styles are accepted by the masses, then new types of traditions come into being. On the contrary, the individuals living in small towns have fewer chances to exchange their ideas and minds with other who live and think differently. As men are prone to live in stable mood, without serious disturbance, they would not be likely to change their long established traditions. Accordingly, people in small towns have less possibility to generate new traditions.

Admittedly, small cities, which are far from the center of the country, preserve much cultural possessions, and these traditions should also be protected and inherited. There are some types of traditions that can not be exhibited and preserved in museums, and the particular of those presented in museums can be only be obtainable in their original locations. Music is the most typical type. For example, in China, almost every nation has its own form of music, and further musical forms still have much close relation with their locations.

Finally, I have to acknowledge the point that the thriving process in major cities might, to some extent, scare the most public cultural possession, which is not worth putting into museums. Recently, a decreasing amount of surviving space just pushes this kind of tradition to the edge of abyss. To this extent, the accountability of the governments is to publicize the admiration of their own cultural traditions to the masses, and thus, inspire the people’s innate desire to preserve and inherit the cultural possessions. Further, the governors should distribute extra fund in cultural financial budget to promote the preservation of cultural traditions.

[ Last edited by forevera on 2005-8-24 at 12:37 ]

咯噔UID: 2114564

我先占个位,看了帖上来

flealdaUID: 2118390

1．        承认的确在边远的小城市也保留有大量的文化遗产。
2．        但是大城市里应该有几乎这个国家所有文化的精粹，保护大城市的cultural tradition是最有效率的。
3．        而且小城市更倾向与墨守成规，而大城市里由于国际交往比较多人们的思路比较开阔，也更容易generate cultural tradition。（既然都成国际交往了,全球一体化了,那还有什么各国的传统文化呢?）
4．        不得不指出大城市的thriving process会影响一些最普通的，不值得放进博物馆的cultural tradition东西。所以政府需要做的是普及民众对本国文化的认同和理解，让公众自发的从内心里保护文化，继承文化。



Should governments focus their financial budget on the major cities which is thriving? And do major cities preserve and generate the very nations’ cultural traditions and customs? Facing this complex issue, any extreme responses, without systematic analysis, would be improper. And, as far as I am concerned, the governments, guaranteeing that all small sized cities are well financed, should focus their limited budget moreon major cities to preserve the nations’ cultural traditions efficiently.

To begin with, as to cultural traditions, what major cities maintain are the most centralized, thus, the protections in major cities, especially major cultural centers, are the most efficiently. In ancient times, the emperors called for great amounts of skilled workers to present them all valuable, artistic, and funny things in the country which are called cultural possessions today, such as paintings, gardening art, architectures, etc. In other words, it is a centralized process. In this process, the major cities are endowed with the most splendid cultural wealth and traditions. All these cultural possessions, which are now maintained most in museums, reflect most part of the traditions. Under this circumstance, protection of cultural wealth in major cities enables the limited cultural budget of governments work efficiently. For instance, the imperial palace in China preserves most of Chinese cultural traditions and artistic wealth.


What’s more, big cities have more possibility to generate new cultural tradition s and customs than cities lying on the edge. As for more opportunities of national communication, people in major cities have wide and flexible thinking methods. Consequently, putting traditional culture and the most popular mind into consideration, the very group of people would create some new life styles which are convenient to them. If the life styles are accepted by the masses, then new types of traditions come into being. On the contrary, the individuals living in small towns have fewer chances to exchange their ideas and minds with other who live and think differently. As men are prone to live in stable mood(好象不是这样搭配的), without serious disturbance, they would not be likely to change their long established traditions. Accordingly, people in small towns have less possibility to generate new traditions.

Admittedly, small cities, which are far from the center of the country, preserve much cultural possessions, and these traditions should also be protected and inherited. There are some types of traditions that can not be exhibited and preserved in museums, and the particular of those presented in museums can be only be obtainable in their original locations. Music is the most typical type. For example, in China, almost every nation has its own form of music, and further musical forms still have much close relation with their locations.

Finally, I have to acknowledge the point that the thriving process in major cities might, to some extent, scare the most public cultural possession, which is not worth putting into museums. Recently, a decreasing amount of surviving space just pushes this kind of tradition to the edge of abyss. To this extent, the accountability of the governments is to publicize the admiration of their own cultural traditions to the masses, and thus, inspire the people’s innate desire to preserve and inherit the cultural possessions. Further, the governors should distribute extra fund in cultural financial budget to promote the preservation of cultural traditions.



看了楼主的文章,感觉和我的观点上有很大的不一样, 我个人认为cultural   traditions很大程度上是无法被放入博物馆的,比如一种工艺技能,一些语言...是无形的.所以也不知说什么好. 但论证和结构而言还是很不错的

fancingUID: 208191

Should governments focus their financial budget on the major cities which is thriving? And do major cities preserve and generate the very nations’ cultural traditions and customs? Facing this complex issue, any extreme responses, without systematic analysis, would be improper. And, as far as I am concerned, the governments, guaranteeing that all small sized cities are well financed, should focus their limited budget more on major cities to preserve the nations’ cultural traditions efficiently. 嗯，对于这种复杂结构的题目，好像这种开头很不错~~

To begin with, as to cultural traditions, what major cities maintain are the most centralized, thus, the protections in major cities, especially major cultural centers, are the most efficiently. In ancient times, the emperors called for great amounts of skilled workers to present them all valuable, artistic, and funny things in the country which are called cultural possessions today, such as paintings, gardening art, architectures, etc. In other words, it is a centralized process. In this process, the major cities are endowed with the most splendid cultural wealth and traditions. All these cultural possessions, which are now maintained most in museums, reflect most part of the traditions. Under this circumstance, protection of cultural wealth in major cities enables the limited cultural budget of governments work efficiently. For instance, the imperial palace in China preserves most of Chinese cultural traditions and artistic wealth.

What’s more, big cities have more possibility to generate new cultural traditions and customs than cities lying on the edge. As for more opportunities of national communication, people in major cities have wide and flexible thinking methods. Consequently, putting traditional culture and the most popular mind into consideration, the very group of people would create some new life styles which are convenient to them. If the life styles are accepted by the masses, then new types of traditions come into being. On the contrary, the individuals living in small towns have fewer chances to exchange their ideas and minds with other who live and think differently. As men are prone to live in stable mood, without serious disturbance, they would not be likely to change their long established traditions. Accordingly, people in small towns have less possibility to generate new traditions.

Admittedly, small cities, which are far from the center of the country, preserve much cultural possessions, and these traditions should also be protected and inherited. There are some types of traditions that can not be exhibited and preserved in museums, and the particular of those presented in museums can be 去掉 only be obtainable in their original locations. Music is the most typical type. For example, in China, almost every nation has its own form of music, and further musical forms still have much close relation with their locations. 觉得这里应该把例子写具体一些，比如说许多边远的少数民族都有很多自己的民歌，世代流传，然而由于贫困，很多民族不能得以发展，人口越来越少，这一宝贵的文化也会逐渐消失，不知道该怎么说，只是觉得这一段可以不用强调那些不会放在博物馆里的文化，而只是强调小城市或者村庄也有哪些哪些文化

Finally, I have to acknowledge the point that the thriving process in major cities might, to some extent, scare the most public cultural possession, which is not worth putting into museums. Recently, a decreasing amount of surviving space just pushes this kind of tradition to the edge of abyss. To this extent, the accountability of the governments is to publicize the admiration of their own cultural traditions to the masses, and thus, inspire the people’s innate desire to preserve and inherit the cultural possessions. Further, the governors should distribute extra fund in cultural financial budget to promote the preservation of cultural traditions.

楼主写得很不错，嗯，又让我的思路开阔了一些：））
而且楼主语言真的很棒啊，很多词自己明明知道，但就是用不到文章中去~

cxlbread84UID: 184012

Admittedly, small cities, which are far from the center of the country, preserve much cultural possessions, which can reinforce the preservation of cultures. Take music as a case in point. In China, there are numerous nation forms of music, which diminish in the big city due to the interaction with other culture, such as Beijing Opera. Now only in the small cities can we watch them again. Since such traditions should also be preserved and inherited, governments should also give small cities financial supports.
关于让步段， 我感觉不太清楚， 这是我的一点建议。
还有，楼主你最后一段scare是不是改称scarce， scare是恐吓的意思，但scarce只有形容词性。
总之，楼主这篇真不错啊

foreveraUID: 202035

scare在这的意思其实是有不好的影响。。字面上解释可以解释为sth。 威胁到了sth

batterflyUID: 196681

Should governments focus their financial budget on the major cities which is thriving? And do major cities preserve and generate the very nations’ cultural traditions and customs? Facing this complex issue, any extreme responses, without systematic analysis, would be improper. And, as far as I am concerned, the governments, guaranteeing that all small sized cities are well financed, should focus their limited budget more on major cities to preserve the nations’ cultural traditions efficiently.嗯，开头不错哦:)
To begin with, as to cultural traditions, what major cities maintain are the most centralized, thus, the protections in major cities, especially major cultural centers, are the most efficiently. In ancient times, the emperors called for great amounts of skilled workers to present them all valuable, artistic, and funny things in the country which are called cultural possessions today, such as paintings, gardening art, architectures, etc. In other words, it is a centralized process. In this process, the major cities are endowed with the most splendid cultural wealth and traditions. All these cultural possessions, which are now maintained most in museums, reflect most part of the traditions. Under this circumstance, protection of cultural wealth in major cities enables the limited cultural budget of governments work efficiently. For instance, the imperial palace in China preserves most of Chinese cultural traditions and artistic wealth. 用古代的帝王called for great amounts of skilled workers to present them all valuable, artistic, and funny things in the country which are called cultural possessions today, such as paintings, gardening art, architectures, etc，做例子，但是现在的大城市很多并不是古代帝王建都的地方啊，而且paintings, gardening art, architectures，这个好像不是culture tradition 阿，后来楼主用了culture wealth，好像有偷换概念的嫌疑~~~~，而且这个和下一段文章中定义culture tradition为普遍接受的东西有冲突哦:confused:

What’s more, big cities have more possibility to generate new cultural tradition s and customs than cities lying on the edge. As for more opportunities of national communication, people in major cities have wide and flexible thinking methods. Consequently, putting traditional culture and the most popular mind into consideration, the very group of people would create some new life styles which are convenient to them. If the life styles are accepted by the masses, then new types of traditions come into being. On the contrary, the individuals living in small towns have fewer chances to exchange their ideas and minds with other who live and think differently. As men are prone to live in stable mood, without serious disturbance, they would not be likely to change their long established traditions. Accordingly, people in small towns have less possibility to generate new traditions. 觉得文化传统是沉淀下来的东西，被普遍接受了的东西就是传统吗？？这点我和flealda观点相同觉得国际交往多会冲淡传统

Admittedly, small cities, which are far from the center of the country, preserve much cultural possessions, and these traditions should also be protected and inherited. There are some types of traditions that can not be exhibited and preserved in museums, and the particular of those presented in museums can be only be obtainable in their original locations. Music is the most typical type. For example, in China, almost every nation has its own form of music, and further musical forms still have much close relation with their locations.

Finally, I have to acknowledge the point that the thriving process in major cities might, to some extent, scare the most public cultural possession, which is not worth putting into museums. Recently, a decreasing amount of surviving space just pushes this kind of tradition to the edge of abyss. To this extent, the accountability of the governments is to publicize the admiration of their own cultural traditions to the masses, and thus, inspire the people’s innate desire to preserve and inherit the cultural possessions. Further, the governors should distribute extra fund in cultural financial budget to promote the preservation of cultural traditions. 这个因果关系好象有问题，由于“一些最普通的，不值得放进博物馆的cultural tradition东西”会被影响，所以“政府需要普及民众对本国文化的认同和理解，让公众自发的从内心里保护文化，继承文化。” 既然是一些最普通的，不值得放进博物馆的cultural tradition东西”会被影响，那没有必要去保护阿

嗯，觉得楼主的语言很不错:victory:
这个题目观点我比较倾向于反对，不过issue是没有正确答案的。但是对culture tradition 的理解上是不是有待商榷，和flealda观点相同
还有就是最后一段的让步做的不太好。
呵呵，个人意见，

[ Last edited by batterfly on 2005-8-25 at 16:25 ]

foreveraUID: 202035

我的理解cultural tradition并不是专指一些传统习俗之类的东西。。。而是能反射出渗透在其中的这个民族的精神的东西。。。
还有国际化冲淡的问题，国际化的确能冲淡一些比较久远的tradition但是会generate新的tradition

batterflyUID: 196681

traditon
1 an inherited,established,or customary pattern of thought or action
2 the handing down of beliefs and customs by word of mouth or by example without written instruction;also, a belief or custom thus handed down.
这个是我韦氏字典上面的解释，都是继承或者流传下来的阿，我的意思就是现在开放能不能产生新的traditon不是当代人能决定的

但是你指出的paintings, gardening art, architectures没有说明是可以反射民族精神的阿，不是帝王用过的东西和他喜欢的东西就能反射民族精神吧

阿，我要先去实验室了，晚点回来看帖子！！！！

meteor18_leeUID: 189655

我的意见是，这一篇LZ论得很不错啊，语言也很好，
公说公有理，呵呵
但是，和前面几楼的一样，这个说generate new traditions,就不合逻辑啦，哈哈，该是generate new culture.吧
我这篇狂跑题的大家看看吧
issue11
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=326610

[ Last edited by meteor18_lee on 2005-8-26 at 04:11 ]