Issue7 Fantasy互改群8.26

modeuxUID: 2107416

题目：
Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.

提纲：
1、法律是不断发展的，是由人类不断进步的智力水平和文化水平决定的。
2、法律是一项繁重琐细的任务，不可能巨细弥遗，因此需要不断的修改完善。
3、科学的进步催生出很多法律约束之外的新现象，需要增加相对性的法律条款。
4、不可否认，过度的灵活性会损害法律的公正性和权威性。

正文：
The author suggests that laws should not be too rigid so that they will be adaptable to various circumstances, times and places. In my point of view, I tend to support the idea that laws should be flexible, but to a certain extent. And it is proper flexibility and adaptability that will help laws to become more efficient and robust.

In the first place, laws themselves are always in a developing process, they should not be invariable. It is human beings that legislate the laws, so to a great extent, laws are related to, even dominated by human's intellectual level, cultural level and traditional conception, etc. With the development of technology and civilization, above factors are always developed and altered continuously, thus laws should also have proper changes to keep accordance with the variety of them. Otherwise laws may be outdated and incompetent if they keep in an unvaried situation. An extreme example is that laws thousands of years ago are obviously unacceptable for contemporary society. Therefore our developing society needs developing laws.

In the second place, considering laws’ own complexity and elaboration, proper and timely supplement to the laws is required. The function of laws is to guarantee the equality and justice to every person, so that laws are expected to be as exhaustive and elaborate as possible, had better to the perfect extent that they can consider all of the circumstances, times and places. Unfortunately it is unrealistic and so that laws may inevitably contain some negligence that may be imposed by some speculative people, who may find and catch the laws' negligence to acquire illegal benefit. For example, some avaricious businessmen may impose artifices that are unlawful but not specifically forbidden by laws, to gain illegal profit. And lacking of laws' guide, we can’t substantially deal with them, condemn them or convict them. So laws should be always supplemented and reinforced.

Moreover, due to the rapid development of scientific technology, we may be confronted with many phenomena that we have never faced before, in this condition, laws are required to accordingly make changes to deal with them. Such phenomena, for example, computer viruses and hackers, they increase at a high speed along with the development of computers and Internet just recent years, and they have already made great trouble to our daily office-automation work and private leisure life. They are so fresh that no corresponding laws are legislated to specifically deal with them, and it can be predicted that without laws' restriction and control, they will surely do greater harm to human society. Thus aiming at new harmful phenomena, corresponding legal clause must be established.

However, it is no denying that laws must be rigid when executed to ensure its equality and justice. They can’t be over flexible, even become unsteady. If laws vary too frequently, people will consider that they are not equally treated. Without justice and equality, laws will consequently lose their authority. Considering following example, if a person with a certain misdeed, gets his punishment according to current laws. But soon later the laws have changed, and the penalty of another person with the same misdeed, will thereby be executed in another way. It is apparently unequal and unacceptable.

In conclusion, due to the above-mentioned reasons, we can finally draw a conclusion that flexibility are certainly beneficial to laws, it could reinforce laws' efficiency and influence. But stability is still essential in laws' execution to maintain laws' equality and inviolability. Over flexibility also do harm to laws' justice and authority.


这篇是以前写过的，今天只大概修改了一下就拿出来贴了
可能问题多了些，大家多指教~~~

今天正好有时间练Argument了~~~

meteor18_leeUID: 189655

提纲：
1、法律是不断发展的，是由人类不断进步的智力水平和文化水平决定的。
2、法律是一项繁重琐细的任务，不可能巨细弥遗，因此需要不断的修改完善。
3、科学的进步催生出很多法律约束之外的新现象，需要增加相对性的法律条款。
4、不可否认，过度的灵活性会损害法律的公正性和权威性。

正文：
The author suggests that laws should not be too (不需要too，中文这么说，可英文感觉不地道) rigid so that they will be adaptable to various circumstances, times and places. In my point of view, I tend to support the idea that laws should be flexible, but（这个but也多余了，啥意思啊？） to a certain extent. And it is proper flexibility and adaptability that will help laws to become more efficient and robust（这个是形容人的啦，用powerful就可以啦）.

In the first place, laws themselves are always in a developing process, they should not be invariable. It is human beings that legislate the laws, so to a great extent, laws are related to, even dominated by human's intellectual level, cultural level and traditional conception, etc. With the development of technology and civilization, above factors are always developed and altered continuously, thus laws should also have proper changes to keep accordance with the variety of them. Otherwise laws may be outdated and incompetent if they keep in an unvaried situation（用state感觉好些，state是事物的状态，situation综合了事物及其周围的环境，情形，讨论这小词，可能较真了点）. An extreme example is that laws thousands of years ago are obviously unacceptable for contemporary society. Therefore our developing society needs developing laws.

In the second place, considering laws’ own complexity and elaboration, proper and timely supplement to the（the多余了，呵呵，这个错咱中国人常犯） laws is required. The function of laws is to guarantee the equality and justice to every person, so that laws are expected to be as exhaustive and elaborate as possible, had better to the perfect extent that they can consider all of the circumstances, times and places. Unfortunately it is unrealistic and so that laws may inevitably contain some negligence that may be imposed by some speculative people, who may find and catch the laws' negligence to acquire illegal benefit. For example, some avaricious businessmen may impose artifices that are unlawful（没被禁止咋说非法咧，呵呵，这个例子不太说明问题，只是抛出了概念，不具体） but not specifically forbidden by laws, to gain illegal profit. And lacking of laws' guide, we can’t substantially deal with them, condemn them or convict them. So laws should be always supplemented and reinforced.

Moreover, due to the rapid development of scientific technology, we may be confronted with many phenomena that we have never faced before, in this condition, laws are required to accordingly make changes to deal with them. Such phenomena, for example, （as） computer viruses and hackers, they（去掉they，前面有主语了） increase at a high speed along with the development of computers and Internet just recent years, and they have already made great trouble to our daily office-automation work and private leisure life. They are so fresh that no corresponding laws are legislated to specifically deal with them, and it can be predicted that without laws' restriction and control, they will surely do greater harm to human society. Thus aiming at new harmful phenomena, corresponding legal clause must be established.（这一段比上一段充分）

However, it is no denying that laws must be rigid when executed to ensure its equality and justice. They can’t be over flexible, even become unsteady. If laws vary too frequently, people will consider that they are not equally treated. Without justice and equality, laws will consequently lose their authority. Considering following example, if a person with a certain misdeed, gets his punishment according to current laws. But soon later the laws have changed, and the penalty of another person with the same misdeed, will thereby be executed in another way. It is apparently unequal and unacceptable.（这个～～要是按你说的，那还是law吗，例子怪怪的）

In conclusion, due to the above-mentioned reasons, we can finally draw a conclusion that flexibility are certainly beneficial to laws, it could reinforce laws' efficiency and influence. But stability is still essential in laws' execution to maintain laws' equality and inviolability. Over flexibility also do harm to laws' justice and authority.

我看不出太多问题了，LZ继续加油！555我已经快崩溃了，都考虑延期了，结果武汉没座位了

另外谢谢LZ对俺这篇跑题烂作的指导，大家有空也看看？
issue11
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

modeuxUID: 2107416

第二个论点的例子，是想说一些投机者利用法律的漏洞非法谋利。
让步段里，是想举个极端些的例子来说明法律不能太灵活。

不过好像都不成功啊，呵呵

谢过meteor18_lee~~~
很快你就要考了，努力啊~~~