issue4 simle-B 第六次作业 求狠拍，有拍必回

dychangfengUID: 2216148

I fundamentally agree that, the development of a field, though is mainly based on the related knowledge about this subject, also need knowledge outside its realm.

To begin with, we can resort to the significant contribution that Newton has made to physics. It is acknowledged that Newton has created a complete system of classical mechanics which play an important role in modern physics even it has been proved it is not right in some occasions by the theory of relativity. Yet the process of how Newton creates his theory is less known to people than the theory itself. As far as I know, if Newton has not turn to mathematics, there has a possibility that we has no physics at all, at least have it not developed like it is nowadays, for mathematics is a tool for physics. Why does this happen? Well we all know that at the beginning of our human beings bringing born to science subjects, all the disciplines now existed were called nature philosophy. As the advance of knowledge and technology, people find it necessary that it is impossible for an individual to master all the knowledge involved in nature philosophy, at last it was divided into math, chemistry, and physics according to its functions and what they research. Given this, it will be easy for us to recognize that the development of one subject needs knowledge of other fields.

Also, we will know more about this issue when we look back the history of biology chemistry. The relation of different disciplines is not limited to their resources. As the increasing complexity of disciplines, each subject begin to find that there is always some relation between two subjects when it come to some particular things  and sooner or later, scientists will realize that if they  join the two or many subjects together, we will get more benefits from them. The example at hand is the born of biology chemistry. When modern chemistry meets modern biology, there is biology chemistry. Both chemists and biologists have an increasing feeling that they need the knowledge of the other subject when they study the organic chemistry and specific explanations of some biological phenomena. So we can equally imagine when a chemist and a biologist meet each other, how excited they are to discuss with each other about the problems they encountered in their study and that have troubled them for quite a long time. This join of different subjects is the requisite of advance of our society. No one can ignore or prevent the tendency.

Admittedly, the most significant advance in one field depends on mostly the knowledge of this discipline itself. Comparing with what we have discussed above, there is more tendencies for us to agree that the significant of one subject depends on the knowledge in itself Most of law in physics, chemistry, or economic are come into being in the inner of one subject and most of those who discover them only have enough knowledge in the subject he or she specialized in.

Of course, the proceedings and reasons of development of every subject is so complicated that we can not understand thoroughly. However, through what we have discussed, I hope I have demonstrated clearly that though the significant advance of one discipline mostly depend on the knowledge in its subject, they do need the knowledge and experience of other fields sometime.

留下链接，有拍必回

zhy5186612UID: 2167373

I fundamentally agree that, the development of a field, though is mainly based on the related knowledge about this subject, also need knowledge outside its realm.

To begin with, we can resort to the significant contribution that Newton has made to physics. It is acknowledged that Newton has created a complete system of classical mechanics which play an important role in modern physics even it has been proved it is not right in some occasions by the theory of relativity. Yet the process of how Newton creates his theory is less known to people than the theory itself. As far as I know [这句话有点口语化了], if Newton has not turn to mathematics, there has a possibility that we has no physics at all, at least have it not developed like it is nowadays, for mathematics is a tool for physics. Why does this happen? [Well we all know that at the beginning of our human beings bringing born to science subjects[这句话看不太懂], all the disciplines now existed were called nature philosophy. As the advance of knowledge and technology, people find it necessary that it is impossible for an individual to master all the knowledge involved in nature philosophy, at last it was divided into math, chemistry, and physics according to its functions and what they research括号里面的这些句子和牛顿的例子及中心关系有点模糊]. Given this, it will be easy for us to recognize that the development of one subject needs knowledge of other fields.

Also, we will know more about this issue when we look back the history of biology chemistry. The relation of different disciplines is not limited to their resources. As the increasing complexity of disciplines, each subject begin to find that there is always some relation between two subjects when it come to some particular things  and sooner or later, scientists will realize that if they  join the two or many subjects together, we will get more benefits from them. The example at hand is the born of biology chemistry. When modern chemistry meets modern biology, there is biology chemistry [biochemistry] . Both chemists and biologists have an increasing feeling that they need the knowledge of the other subject when they study the organic chemistry and specific explanations of some biological phenomena. So we can equally [equally可以不用吧？] imagine when a chemist and a biologist meet each other, how excited they are to discuss with each other about the problems they encountered in their study and that have troubled them for quite a long time. This join of different subjects is the requisite of advance of our society. No one can ignore or prevent the tendency.

Admittedly, the most significant advance in one field depends on mostly the knowledge of this discipline itself.[这个让步有点过了，因为若你要论述 significant advance 更取决于学科自身的话，到可以这样。但是你前面已经花了两段论述outsider的重要性] Comparing with what we have discussed above, there is more tendencies for us to agree that the significant of one subject depends on the knowledge in itself Most of law in physics, chemistry, or economic are come into being in the inner of one subject and most of those who discover them only have enough knowledge in the subject he or she specialized in.

Of course, the proceedings and reasons of development of every subject is so complicated that we can not understand thoroughly. However, through what we have discussed, I hope I have demonstrated clearly that though the significant advance of one discipline mostly depend on the knowledge in its subject, they do need the knowledge and experience of other fields sometime.
个人意见哈
1 你文章越来越好了，我市无论如何都写不了那么多字啊，这片伤透我脑筋了
2 句式词汇丰富，结构也好，但我个人感觉你擅长表述事实说理不是太多，给我的感觉是不是太能服人。当然我的更差 哈哈