- 最后登录
- 2014-8-10
- 在线时间
- 11 小时
- 寄托币
- 672
- 声望
- 25
- 注册时间
- 2007-6-24
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 12
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 433
- UID
- 2354391

- 声望
- 25
- 寄托币
- 672
- 注册时间
- 2007-6-24
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 12
|
发表于 2007-12-22 21:53:19
|显示全部楼层
As the speaker assert that the student before they enter college, they will have the same national curriculum to offer no matter where are they instead of having different academic courses to offer. I concede that the speaker have his own perspective that every student should be educated at a base when they enter the college, but it all depends on a case-by-case basis.
Just as the speaker mentioned that a nation have the responsibilities to require the student have the curriculum until they enter college. Education is the most significant way of proceeding the whole society. But the speaker have dismissed(解散?) that he have based this situation on a national level, which we should take everything into consideration that a nation is full of patches where have different background, for instance, perhaps they do not share the same vernacular, the same custom or even the same relief. So we can not put everything together easily that require all the school to offer the same curriculum before the college. So every patches(这里是什么意思?) have rights to determine the academic courses they will offer
Admittedly, everybody should be educated no matter how poor he is, even if he is lake(?) the confidence to get more education. We should pay the immediate attention to that a small group of students, professional training might be the way to go since well-developed skills, all other factors being equal, can be the difference between having a job or not. For the rest of the students who have the chance to do more professional research in the college, will also have the chance to finish the academic courses.
It should be observed, of course, that no school, vocational or not ,is helped by a confusion over its purpose. What we will do now is(和后面重复了) no matter what the student will choose, we should devote our all resources to offer them a chance to meet their goals for their choice.
On the contrary, when we circumspect about the debate whether we should provide the same curriculum until the student enter college, the aim of making our society more prosperous and stronger.(这句话没动词…) We have to put up the citizen's morality and controlling their behavior by law system. So the nation has the duty to make the standard for the society more publicly, that is, to set the curriculum about morality and laws. At the same time, in order to keep pace with the rapid developing technology, computer skill is inevitable--in any case, basic computer skills are solely complementary to the host of real skills that are necessary to becoming any kind of professional.
To sum up, I concede the speaker's assertion that the nation have the responsibilities to offer the curriculum to all the citizens no matter how poor he is or the huge background he has, it is equal to everybody. But the same courses begs the questions that---every patches in the nation have different background which asked for the academic courses. And also, small group of student will not choose to continue the education(不是继续教育,而是继续学习) after they are graduated. But what we should do is to offer the morality and computer courses to make sure the development of the entire society and rapid growth of technology to meet the needs of the new century. |
|