【09年1月-4月】TOEFL作文互改小组TWE作业02.05by bjzhengja

bjzhengjaUID: 2381883

我听力特别不好的说。。。真的是纯根据reading瞎编了。。。评判的人帮我好好拍拍吧！给我些指点吧~~~谢谢了！！
The lecture talks about several reasons that privatized spaceflight industry will not have much benefit to science and public. The speaker thinks that the argument in the reading material is quite ridiculous.

First, privatization of space technology have little relative with the cost of space travelling. The control system of spacecraft is quite complex and there is little possibility to privatize the space technology. Also, safety of the travelers is another element should be considered. To travel in space, the craft should be test and retest many times, and this progress cost a lot of money.

Second, privatization of space travel will not only accelerate the rate at which important scientific discoveries occur, but also might make scientists suffer from the business. This directly contradicts what the passage indicates.

Finally, will the expenses of space travel really not be paid for by the whole taxpaying public? The answer is no. To start out a spacecraft, there should be space stations and airports. Building these public facilities will cost much more taxpaying.

holdingUID: 2285054

The lecture talks about several reasons that privatized spaceflight industry will not have much benefit to science and public. The speaker thinks that the argument in the reading material is quite ridiculous. （开头最好说一下阅读材料里的大意，这样也方便后面的辩驳）

First, privatization of space technology have little relative with the cost of space travelling. The control system of spacecraft is quite complex and there is little possibility to privatize the space technology. Also, safety of the travelers is another element should be considered. To travel in space, the craft should be test and retest many times, and this progress cost a lot of money. （天……这是你没听懂的情况下写出的？点完全都踩上了啊……）
8 p# d3 @) ]4 J% R3 z, H  h; ]: \
Second, privatization of space travel will not only accelerate the rate at which important scientific discoveries occur, but also might make scientists suffer from the business. This directly contradicts what the passage indicates. （这个点错了，speaker的观点应该是这样的太空旅游可能会使科学发展变慢，与阅读材料中的观点相反）

Finally, will the expenses of space travel really not be paid for by the whole taxpaying public? The answer is no. To start out a spacecraft, there should be space stations and airports. Building these public facilities（听力材料里有public这词吗？如果没有就别写了） will cost much more taxpaying （tax）.

总体来说没有你说的那么惨，只是第二个点没有听好。还有个人觉得最后最好有个总结。

不会太久vivianUID: 2592395

lecture talks about several reasons that privatized spaceflight industry will not (have much) benefit (to)可以去掉 science and public. The speaker thinks that the argument in the reading material is quite ridiculous.


First, privatization of space technology have little relative with the cost of space travelling. The control system of spacecraft is quite complex and there is little possibility to privatize the space technology（因为很complex所以expensive）. Also, safety of the travelers is another element should be considered. To travel in space, the craft should be test and retest many times, and this progress cost a lot of money.


Second, privatization of space travel will not only accelerate the rate at which important scientific discoveries occur, but also might make scientists suffer from the business. （加一句因为公司追求利益，延缓甚至妨碍科学成果的发展 这点也可以反推啊～ 加上这个·点就全了）This directly contradicts what the passage indicates

Finally, will the expenses of space travel really not be paid for by the whole taxpaying public? The answer is no. To start out（没有 start out a spacecraft 这个搭配） a spacecraft, there should be space stations and airports. Building these public facilities will cost much more taxpaying.

   ·～反推确实是救命稻草，八九不离十， 楼主再多练练听力～～ 加油～～一起努力·:handshake