- 最后登录
- 2016-12-5
- 在线时间
- 571 小时
- 寄托币
- 968
- 声望
- 20
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-6
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 55
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 635
- UID
- 2528107
- 声望
- 20
- 寄托币
- 968
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 55
|
2# firework小可
能否帮我看一下我这篇? 衷心感谢
In this argument, the arguer recommends that we should install software which can detect employees' Internet use on company computers. To support his recommendation, he claims that this policy can prevent employees from wasting time, foster a better work ethic and improves our overall profits. However, in the very first glance, the arguer's claim seems to be plausible, but after a clearly thinking, it lies in several fallacies and logical flaws discussed below.
To begin with, the arguer's precondition which can prevent employees from wasting time on the Internet may not be guaranteed. Of course the employees in this company will waste littler time on the Internet, but we can not ensure that these employees will take this time to work. For example, the employees will not buy something on the Internet after this software installation, but they will buy something in the market by this work time. So the employees will also reduce their productivity if this thing happened.
Even if I were to concede that it is the fact that this thing will not happened in this company, the arguer's claim is also suspect. The arguer did not offer us any evidence about how the employees productivity. So perhaps their productivity is very high now. They do not must to install the software. In addition, the arguer also does not offer us the data about different productivity between before and after install the software. If the different is so small that we can not care about it, we have no necessary to install the electronic monitor.
At last but not least, the arguer's conclusion is too hasty. His goal is to improve our overall profits. But there is no relationship between improving the profits and implementing electronic monitoring. The profit, in fact, not only depends on the efficiency of employees, but also relies on many aspects such as reduction of cost, sale of productions, strategy of leader etc. Furthermore, implementing this system is also a spending. It is entirely possible that install this electronic monitor will take a lot of money and we have to put some staff to manage the software. These will take a lot of money and betray the arguer's goal. Moreover, maybe the software will reduce the employees' computer speed. It will lead to reduce productivity.
To sum up, as it stands, the argument lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To make it logically acceptable, the arguer needs to provide us specific information about this software and more data about the employees' productivity. |
|