- 最后登录
- 2009-2-10
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 41
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-29
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 27
- UID
- 2595924

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 41
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-29
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
本帖最后由 dylan1989 于 2009-2-8 21:20 编辑
Should government focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future? The speaker claims so, however, in my opinion, the immediate problems and the anticipated are equally important to our society, so the government should balance the focus on either of the problems.
On one hand, the governments should focus on the immediate problems, for the reason that they are emergent and relates(relate) to the stability of the society. Immediate problems, such as poverty, immediate mishap, political issues, and economical turbulence, if not properly dealed with, may cause serious results. For example, China suffered from a disaster last year- the earthquake in Si Chuan province. During that time, it became the most immediate problem calling the attentions of the whole nation, and of course, the government focused more on dealing with the emergency. Our premier Wen Jiabao went there at the first time, the media reported the conditions every hour, and a lot of soldiers were sent to the area to save people's life. I cannot imagine what will happen if the government does not focus on this problem, maybe more people will die or become homeless and our country will suffer turbulence. Understandably, the immediate problems surely deserve the government's urgent attention. Only when the government put the immediate problems on the center of their work can they make the society more effective词汇不太妥当 and efficient.
On the other hand, the governments should have the long-term sights to not only consider the immediate problems but also try to solve the anticipated problems of the future(这一句有点重复,改成the government should have long-term sight to solve the anticipated…可能会简洁些。). It is a misconception that the government can ignore the anticipated problems. If the government fails to prepare for the future it will cause disaster to its country in the long run.这一句有语法错误 For example, look at the environment around us, with the development of modern science and technology, we human beings are become(becoming) the master of the earth. To seek our own good, we excessively cut down the trees, letting the forests become dissert; we pollute the lakes, the rivers, and the seas resulting in the death of other creatures; we also excessively use the energy, letting them exhausted. If things go on like this, maybe one day we will have no water to drink, no energy to use, no house to live in. It is also unfair to our descendants, do you have the heart to imagine them seek water to survival, seek energy to get warm and look up to the sky just want to see it blue. To make things better, I think it is time for the government to take the anticipated more seriously. They should enact a “sustainable development” policy to solve these environmental problems. Furthermore, they should not only concern the contemporary lives of their people, but also consider more for their descendants.
In my observation, both the immediate problems and the anticipated problems relate to the survival and the prosperity of our society, and overstate either of them may cause serious problems.
文章开始提出要二者兼备,并分别说明重要性,最后总结主旨。整个结构比较清晰,但在最后结尾处有些单薄,最好能把合的部分写的丰满一些。文章中用词有时会不太恰当,可能还要加强一下。
PS:第一次改作文,如有不妥之处还请见谅。 |
|