- 最后登录
- 2010-12-11
- 在线时间
- 8 小时
- 寄托币
- 237
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-9-2
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 165
- UID
- 2540810

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 237
- 注册时间
- 2008-9-2
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
本帖最后由 jhr_hit 于 2009-2-12 17:20 编辑
TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
WORDS: 553
TIME: 00:45:00
DATE: 2009-2-9 17:47:42
Art, in its broadest meaning, is the expression of creativity or imagination. It is the artists who create arts. However, when it comes to the question that is the artist or the critic who gives society something of lasting value, it may let me deluge in deep thinking. Of course, artists create arts, but it is the critics who select the valuable one from their own perspectives, even not all proved reasonable.
To begin with, arts are of crucial significance in the history of mankind and in the developmental and the advancement process of our society. And artists as the creator of them, of course play a vital role to leave these treasure to the world. It is Claude Monet's
Sunrise that let us go into a impressionable world and give us more imaginary space; it is Beethoven's symphonies that excited us and purify our sole; it is Anderson's fairy tales that accompany us to grow up and let us believe the truth, honest, and beauty in the world. Through these arts, such as painting, music, literature, sculpture and so on, our temperaments are edified and we get more understanding of our society.
However, nowadays, with the development of science and technology, there are more and more types of arts and more people take part in these fields, so we are facing with more arts.
At this time, critics go to their position. A critic's evaluation of an art serves as a filter, which helps us determine which art worth our time and attention. For example, there are thousands of movies created each year and the price of the tickets is often very high. Instead of judging which one we should choose, we can ask the critics for help. They are the specialists in this fields, they see so many films that they can easily distinct the valuable ones through their experiences. Another example is music, when we are listening to the music with another kind of language, we do not know much about their cultures or backgrounds, asking help from some critics is still a good method. Moreover, the critics can give a feedback to the artist in order to help them improve themselves and create more valuable arts.
Undue emphasis the function of critics is not appropriate, because the critics do not always know what they are talking about, and may undermine some valuable arts. Since different people have different opinions towards the same art, they may common on arts through their own interests, angles, cultures, backgrounds or subjective perspectives, which is not fair to the artist. For example, some critics who is too old to accept the art created by the youth, saying their literatures have too much description of sex and violence, and also some musicians who is in favor of classic music may feel upset with the R&B or the country music. In addition, some artists may not be accepted by the contemporary critics. Beethoven's early listener dismissed his symphonies as causing their ears hurt and Van Gogh was condemned as a pagan image unsuitable to his country.
In sum, not all the critics can give society something of lasting values, but through their feedback, we can see the arts more clearly, and as times went by the value of the arts are always affirmed by the critics. |
|