A51 大家看看有没有4分？（弱弱的说～）

kay8815UID: 2668603

A51 实验――使用抗生素防止二次感染――建议所有有肌肉损伤患者都服用
1.对比实验问题：没有提供两组对比实验对象的任何资料，年龄，性别， 人数 ，地区，身体状况，等生理特征。不能肯定结论是否具有普遍性。
2.错误因果：导致最终结果可能有其他因素。（1）可能服用抗生素的一组病人平均较年轻，（2）病情较轻 （3）医生水平不一样，根据常识，专攻肌肉运动学的医生可能更有针对性。（4）两组对比中忽略了条件的不同，即糖丸。没有证据证明糖丸不影响康复。
3. 单个推整体：只是初步实验，并没证明适合所有人。（1）常识 有人会过敏

Grounding on the preliminary research conducted by two doctors, the author comes to the conclusion that all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain ought to take antibiotics as a part of the treatment. However, the reasoning process is flawed in several major aspects.
Primarily, to make comparesion between two groups, the author should ensure every factor related to the study is the same. Without any detailed information of the patients, such as age, sex, health condition and so on, the author could not convince me that the two groups of patients are comparable. For insurance, maybe patients in first group are comparatively younger on average than that of the second group. Younger people, with the superior condition in health, could possiblily accelerate the process of coverage. Moreover, perhaps the patients in first group suffers from less serious illness than that of the second group.
Next, the patients are treated by doctors in different fields. As a common sense, patient's recovery is related greatly to the doctor's experience and expertise. For that matter, Dr.Newland, who is specialized in sports medicine, might be better at dealing with muscle strain patients than Dr. Alton who might has no experience in this field.
Additionally, the author also takes it for granted that sugar pills has neutral without any explanation. As we know, sugar is the cause of some illness such as diabetes. we are not informed of how many sugar pills they take each day, it is quite possible that sugar can slow down the patient's recovery if taken too much or with other medicine. Without evidence of the assumption's reliability, the author can not convince me that sugar has nothing to do with patient's recovery.
Finally, the argument assumes that the conclusion drew from the study are representative of the overall people who suffer from muscle strain. Yet the author fails to cover other alternatives .For insurance, we all know some people are allergic to antibiotics, taking in antibiotics may bring these people in danger. Thus, the conclusion that patients with muscle strain should take antibiotic is not trustable, even dangerous in a way.
To sum up, I would suspend my judgment about the reliability of this argument until the author can provide more details about the study.

kay8815UID: 2668603

提纲顺序改了一下 直接看文章吧 汗。。。。不帮忙改没关系 帮我定位下这个是什么水平，这是我的第四篇习作。谢啦