继续帖今天的听写情况
2010-12-07:
Now using (you’ve been) reading articles about the tremendousdamage done to life and property by earthquakes, that's why seismologists havebeen working so hard to develop methods of earthquake prediction.
We cannot (now) predict earthquakes very(fairly) well,but the predictions only locate potential areas of danger. It only (Theydon’t) predict the specific time and location at which earthquake islikely to occur. Today I want to introduce to you three prediction models that are being (have been) developed. The first prediction model looks along earthquake faults, those cracks in the earth’s crust, to find a longsize of (what are knownas seismic) gaps. Size of (Seismic)gaps are places where the fault has show (shown) a little long (orno) size of (seismic) activity for a long times. This theory postulates that such places are do (due) for a major shock. The second model relies on phenomena, like [grantude](ground tilt). Using long [selend] (cylindrical)tubes containing water, observers noted that [grantude](ground tilt) tented tooccur before major earthquakes. That led them to correctly predict the big high[Chan] (Haicheng) earthquakeof 1975, the first successful earthquake prediction scientists have ever made. A million people were [vercued] (evacuated) for (from) the (that) Chinese city before the earthquake stroke (struck---(strike的过去式和过去分词,其实这里原词是想到strike)). Unfortunately, this method hasn't workedconsistently, so we can't say its (it’s) being perfected. The third model is based on the theory that major earthquakes closelyfollow a series [mayaland] (minor ones). Studying (Starting) withmeasurements and timing of the small (smaller) earthquakes,a complex formula calculates the “times and (of) increased probability”of a much large earthquake. Right now, this method, likes the first method,cannot predicts the [sefic] (specific) times of(and) places, as (but) that may change as it's for the (further)developed. For the moment, none of these models can predict with reasonable labels (levels) of confident (confidence). Notes:
红色:表示听错的
蓝色:表示修改后的
橙色:表示少听的
橄绿色:表示多听的
做了背影标志的:表示该单词以前不认识或者是专业词语
Problems:
One:这次have been很多都混淆了.
Three:时态等不注意,其实即使听不出来,在写下听到的句子是可以根据上下文推断出。
Four:听得可能发音是对的,但是写出来语法错了。如its 和 it’s
Five: 这次根据发音乱写单词的现象很严重,如seismic 写成 size of. Six: 介词和连词很多都没听出来
|