- 最后登录
- 2013-3-5
- 在线时间
- 215 小时
- 寄托币
- 438
- 声望
- 29
- 注册时间
- 2012-6-27
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 163
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 530
- UID
- 3334152
- 声望
- 29
- 寄托币
- 438
- 注册时间
- 2012-6-27
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 163
|
本帖最后由 hycqy 于 2011-1-9 01:49 编辑
好长时间没码字儿了 今天晚上写一下我对IBT听力练习的认识
IBT的听力时间长 题材广泛 就像烤鸡所说 是考试的一大拦路虎 听力本身是一个长期积累的过程 但是介于很多人希望速成 我只能说一下想在短期内有提高的方法 能吃苦是必要的 每天至少抽出4-5个小时练习听力 根据自身的水平进行听写、听读以及跟读训练 相信不少人看过并正在使用Saavedro的听读跟读方法 我把它放上来以供大家参考
对于这个方法 我有几点需要说明
1.听读指的是不看文本放录音 听到后读出来 录音不间断 读的时候比录音有1-2秒的延迟 这一方法是为了找到自己的盲点 当你跟不上的时候 很可能就是你对某些单词 表达不理解
2.跟读是指看着文本 放录音 跟着文本读出来 录音不间断 这一方法是为了弥补盲点
3.对于想进行听写的人 个人推荐用老托福 因为老托福段子比较短 语速比IBT偏快 很适合听写
4.对于想进行听读跟读的人 个人推荐TPO 因为TPO最接近现在考试的形式和难度
至于具体的分析和方法 在S的附件里说的很清楚了 我就不多说了
我的目的是在S方法的基础上更进一步 加入针对Lecture的出题点分析方法
很多用了S方法的人抱怨没有立竿见影的效果 我觉得一方面是太急功近利 没有发现自己的进步 另一方面就是并没有很好的总结题目的出题点以及文章的结构
还有很多人抱怨笔记的问题 记了很多笔记但是 最后用上的很少 我个人也是从这样的阶段过来的 一开始对笔记毫无头绪 听到什么记下来什么 最后丢掉了很多重要的信息 到了中期还是尽可能多的记笔记 但是发现有了一定针对性 也不那么盲目了 到了最后的阶段 很多东西听到的时候就觉得应该记下来 而且左后也确实考到了那些内容 我觉得这个过程除了依靠听读和跟读 还要很好的把握文章的结构
其实有几种类型的内容很容易被考到 所以我建议大家有针对性的记笔记 下面说说方法
文章结构
这个是要通过一定的积累和反思才能得到的 比如听力是一个教授在讲还是教授和学生互动式的 同时还要分析文章是总分式的 还是按时间顺序 或者其他什么顺序 在这些结构中有不同的出题点
出题点
1.主旨:这个不多说了 每个段子第一个问题基本都是问主旨 但是别太着急 别听到第一句话就赶紧记下来 先听个两三句 可能主旨一起 包括在这几句中
2.分论点:总分结构中把握分论点也是很重要的 分论点不一定每次都出题 但是对于整体理解有很大帮助 分论点的标志包括first一类的字眼的 挺容易识别的
3.例子:我对例子的认识是你不一定很细致的记住所有细节 但是一定要知道这个例子是用来支持哪个论点的
4.互动类型中老师的评论:当学生回答完问题 老师的评论往往容易出态度题
5.某人的语调突然变化 这时候很容易出重听题
附上我的听力分析一篇
Professor:
Last week, we covered some argumentsagainst going back to the Moon. But there arecompelling reasons in favor of another Moon landing too(主旨句),(蓝色句子和红色句子可以看出文章的主题是想解释为什么要再次登月) um… not the least of which is trying to pinpoint the moon’s age(理由1). We could do this in theoryby studying an enormous impact crater, known as the South Pole- Aitken Basin.Um…it’s located in the moon’s South Polar Region.But, since it’s on the far side of the moon, it can only be seen from space.Here is an image of…we’ll call it the SPA
Basin.This color-coated image of the SPA Basin, those aren’t itsactual colors obviously, this image is from the mid 90s, from the Americanspacecraft called Clementine. Um… unlike earlier lunar missions, Clementine didn’t orbit only around the moon’s equator. Itsorbits enable it to send back data to create this topographical map of … well,the grey and white area towards the bottom is the South Pole, the purples andblues in the middle correspond to low elevations - the SPA Basin itself,the oranges and reds around it are higher elevations. The basin measures anamazing 2,500 km indiameter, and its average depth is 12 km.That makes it the biggest known crater in our solar system and it may well bethe oldest.
6 r5 x% v E/ m- K. w( P' a6 x
为了支持理由1 运用了对比 SPA是传统做法
% |" ~* A3 H! v. a: f* ~0 o4 |
You know planetary researchers love studying deep craters until learn about the impacts that created them, how theyredistributed pieces of a planet’s crust and in this case, we especially want to know if any of the mantle, the layer beneath the crust, was exposed by theimpact. Not everyone agrees, but some experts are convinced that whatevercreated the SPA
Basin did penetrate the Moon’s mantle.And we need to find out, because much more than the crust, the mantle contains information about a planet’s or Moon’s totalcomposition. And that’s key to understanding planet formation. Um… Dian?
Dian: So, the only way to know thebasin’s age is to study its rocks directly? Professor: well, from radio surveydata, we know that the basin contains lots of smallercraters. So it must be really old, about 4 billion years, give or take afew hundred million years. But that’s not very precise. If we had rock samplesto study, we’d know whether the small craters were formed by impacts during thefinal stages of planetary formation, or if they resulted from later meteorshowers.5 p3 |4 x0 t% A0 H
通过一问一答 表现出SPA的局限性 也就是不够精确
. P- v5 o @/ s* G" P
Dian: But if we know around how old theBasin is, I’m not sure that’s reason enough to go to the Moon again.: W3 a! c' G$ _5 k
. v) o* q3 F) t# O. h9 [
Professor: No…,but such crude estimates…um…we can do better than that.
仍然是在说不够精确
Besides, thereare other things worth investigating, like is there water ice on the moon(理由2)?Clementine’s data indicated that the wall of the south-polar crater was more reflective than expected. So some experts think there’s probably ice there.Also, data from a later mission indicates significant concentrations of hydrogen and by inference water lessthan a meter underground at both poles.
Student: Well if there’s water, how didit get there? Underground rivers?
Professor: We think meteors that crashedinto the moon or tails of passing comets may have introduced water molecules.Any water molecules that found their way to the floors of craters near themoon’s poles, that water would be perpetually frozen, because the floors ofthose craters are always in shadow. Um…furthermore, if the water ice was mixedin with rock and dust, it would be protected from evaporation.
Dian: So are you saying there might beprimitive life on the moon?
Professor: that’s not my point at all. Um… o.k.,say there is water ice on the moon. That would be a very practical value for afuture moon base for astronauts. Water ice could be melted and purified fordrinking. It could also be broken down into its component parts - oxygen andhydrogen. Oxygen could be used to breathe, and hydrogencould be turned into fuel, rocket fuel. So water ice could enable thecreation of a self-sustaining moon base someday, a mining camp perhaps or adeparture point for further space exploration.
上面是在解释水是怎么来的以及如果存在水的意义 是对理由二的一个延伸
Student: But holding tons of equipmentto the moon to make fuel and build a life support system for a moon base,wouldn’t that be too expensive?/ {, Z( Z1 g9 g6 _4 Y0 W
. O* Y3 A' ^: c9 |2 i& e5 k0 H
7 F. n6 Z+ Q; d
Professor: Permanent base, maybe a way’soff, but we shouldn’t have to wait for that. The dust at the bottom of the SPA
Basin really does have a fascinating story to tell. I wouldn’t give for a few samplesof it.
即使存在水 仍存在的困难 这还是对理由二的延伸
总体来说 教授首先给出主题 也就是再次登月的必要性 然后给出了两点必要性 一个是探究年龄 另一个是探究水的存在 剩下看似凌乱的段落都是在说明这两个主要理由 因此可以认为是总说分述的结构 |
-
总评分: 声望 + 1
查看全部投币
|