寄托家园留学论坛 › 论坛 › 寄托学术类备考版 › GRE作文互动版 › 作文版回收站 › "决战830拍砖组™" 总部 (欢迎战友们常回来坐坐 ...

1 2 3 456 7 8 9 10 ... 16 下一页

返回列表

楼主: 林森森

[未归类] "决战830拍砖组™" 总部 (欢迎战友们常回来坐坐.加油准备笔试吧!) [复制链接]

momo56288860
UID：191433

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 0
寄托币: 678
注册时间: 2005-1-6
精华: 1
帖子: 0

61楼

发表于 2005-8-16 11:51:30 |只看该作者

决战830拍砖组8月16日作业 ISSUE154同主题高频狂练,请兄弟们狂拍

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=320071

多少事，从来急；天地转，光阴迫；一万年太久，只挣朝夕。

使用道具举报

vieriping
UID：207712

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 0
寄托币: 755
注册时间: 2005-5-1
精华: 0
帖子: 0

62楼

发表于 2005-8-16 11:59:30 |只看该作者

申请加入 29日考
我的文章https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthre ... ge=1&highlight=

使用道具举报

yxepoch
UID：2124411

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 192
注册时间: 2005-8-4
精华: 0
帖子: 0

63楼

发表于 2005-8-16 13:16:33 |只看该作者

决战830拍砖组tm 交作业

第一篇 issue
https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=320149

第二篇,这个主题让我没什么信心,大家帮我看看吧 issue
https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=320518

第三篇 argument
https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=320606

[ Last edited by yxepoch on 2005-8-16 at 23:04 ]

使用道具举报

林森森
UID：163922

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 0
寄托币: 472
注册时间: 2004-5-10
精华: 1
帖子: 0

64楼

发表于 2005-8-16 15:20:56 |只看该作者

认证成员入队要求: 已批改队友作文2篇以上 ,并保证平均每天批改两篇(否则取消其队员身份) , 如达到要求的申请入队者请给我发短信以获认证
只有获得认证的队员才可能保证回拍谢谢
另外 (请队员及时将当天之前一天未被批改的连接以短消息的方式发送给我)

"决战830拍砖组" 成立啦! 欢迎8月30号机考的兄弟们加入进来每天1A 1I 同主题同高频题相互批改到8月30一起上战场!!! 发贴时请在标题注名 "决战830拍砖组™"

总部:https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=317783&page=1#pid1729407

谢谢拍我:
ISSUE 41
ISSUE 4
https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=317364&extra=page%3D2%26filter%3Dtype%26typeid%3D101

使用道具举报

zhizhi
UID：2123761

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 0
寄托币: 390
注册时间: 2005-8-3
精华: 0
帖子: 1

65楼

发表于 2005-8-16 15:56:45 |只看该作者

今天作业阿狗 135 :)
https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=320246

鼎均 3.17

使用道具举报

luxury
UID：2124715

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 87
注册时间: 2005-8-5
精华: 0
帖子: 0

66楼

发表于 2005-8-16 16:21:57 |只看该作者

luxury  8.29(南京) 93073209(合肥)

argument 46  以前写的,帮忙拍拍吧,南京7.29考过....总次数12次

By citing a nineteenth century explorer's account and a recent research into the language and legends of the Innu ,the arguer conclude that there probably were grizzly bears in Labrador, and the explorer's account probably accurately identified the bear. However, the arguer’s dispute relies on a series of unverified assumptions and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands.

To begin with, the arguer assumes that there probably were grizzly bears in Labrador just on account of that the recent research indicates that their language has two different kinds of bears and their legends describe the diverse characteristics of the alternative of bears. Yet the assumption amount to scant evidence to increase the reliability. On grounds of the legends, it just indicates that there were two different kinds of the bears, nevertheless there is no evidence regarding these two bears are black bears and grizzly bears. It is possible that they are other two bears that have been extinct long before. And as the legends said that they also attribute different characteristics of the two kinds of bears, however no reason attributed to say that they are the black bear's and grizzly bear's characteristics at all.

Furthermore, even if the two kinds of bears are the conclusion said, yet we can not conclude that they are all come from the western of Canadian-Labrador. The arguer overlooks that the ancient people prefer traveling, and it is entirely possible that they traveled from the west to the east where they found the grizzly bears .Since the argument could not give the information concerning where the ancient people found the two kinds of bears, it cannot convince me that there probably were grizzly bears in the province of Labrador.

Another assumption is that on basis of the explorer's account he or she come to the conclusion ,it is also unwarranted just because that the arguer does not consider when and where the exploring happened. Perhaps that the location is the forest where there were so many trees that there was not enough light to see the appearance of the bears; Or perhaps that the time  is the afternoon even the night ,if true ,the explorer's account is more convincible . Moreover, in that dangerous place and time ,the explorer did not have the enough time to have a aborative look at the bears ,and the grizzly bears have a similar color with  the black bears. In short, without ruling out all of the possibilities, the arguer cannot convince me of the conclusion just because of the problematic explorer's account.

As it stands, the recommendation can be rejected out of hand just on accounts that the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what arguer maintains. To strengthen the conclusion ,the arguer should provide better evidence that what the legend said indeed are the black bears and grizzly bears and where the legend happened is the province of Labrador; Another evidence needed is that  when the exploring happened ,what the explorer seen is the grizzly bear.

使用道具举报