argument241欢迎作文互改小组7月13日作业

dsndiziUID: 2792853

merely based on the unsounded assumptions and dubious evidenceds, the author draws a conclusion that it is a such mistake to apply the less-expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany, because the forgoing experience based and the consideration of big mode of company Delany. Although at the first glance, the conclusion seems to be convincing and appealing, while after thorough consideration, the conclusion is ill-received due to its flaws and defects. From my perspective, there are at least three flaws.

first and foremost, the evidence the article's author gave that Delany can help more laid-off workers find jobs is rooted back to eight years ago and another is one year ago, which the former result can not stand for the same consequence today, as the arguer fails to list out the evidence that the circumstance remains the same as eight or one year ago. because, actually, it can not by denied that the qualities of the workers that are laid off may still have a high level of abilities which can grantee them to find new jobs, thus at past when XYZ using Delany, the employees might have a short time for achieving new jobs, while may this year the characteristics and qualifications of employees who are laid off might not be as great as before, so simply based on the performance in past have no support the situation this year.

In the second place, the arguer supposed the conclusion that Delany is of course to be superior, which is equally questionable. The author simply justifies his claim by the fact that Delany has bigger staff and larger number if branch offices. while, in my view, this will make a counteraction from his claim, as assuming that if Denlany has more branches and faculty, when dealing with the ;aid-off workers, the progress will also be complex inefficiency in some degree, while Walsh Personnel Firm on the other side may be much more effective and efficiency rather than Delany. What' more, in respect of Delany is bigger than Walsh Personnel Firm, that is also reasonable that
Delany will charge much higher than Walsh Personnel Firm.

finally and may be the most importantly, the arguer fails to rules out alternative explanations when judging the benefits of the two companies. In fact, not only larger number of employees or shorter period of time cases means a company is better than the other one, meanwhile the quality of the jobs, Xyz's finance situations may also effect the result. From the argument, it is the reality that may be Delany benefits more employees than Walsh Personnel Firm by the quick time of finding occupations, while the further information is not collectives that if most of them satisfies the jobs , and even the quantity is certified how about the quality remains to be suspected. and if
XYZ this year suffer finance problem that spare little money on the project, Walsh Personnel Firm as is much cheaper still can be tried.

in conclusion ,the argument, which seems to be logical at the first sight, fails to substantiate strong and credible support to what the author indicates. In order to make the conclusion much more thorough and acceptable, the argument could be improved by providing evidence that the situations remains the same so that the the past performance by Delany can be rewritten in this year. It could be further improved by ruling out alternative factors when judging which one to choose.