Issue 40 我的第一篇Issue，求各位给指点一下吧。题目：科研方向应该凭兴趣还是面

tomwangUID: 189768

2月初就考了，才开始练Issue, 着急啊。麻烦各位给看看俺现在最需要加强的是哪些方面，bow！！！
Topic
"Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a
contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests,
however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."

正文：
Should scholars and researchers pursue their individual interests even though they are unusual or idiosyncratic? The complex nature of the above issue requires us to consider it on a case-by-case basis. In my point of view, I agree with the speaker. My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

In the first place, the important reason in support of my view is that many research may seem to have nothing to do with the society's advancement, however, nobody can make sure that it will not have a tremendous effect to the society in the future. For instance, when Albert Einstein was young, he always would like to think about the relation between time and space, which other people at that time may feel quite curious. However, during the Second World War, the A-bomb, which destroyed a whole city easily, is just based on the theory of relativity. Under this circumstance, it is obvious that some research which seems to be useless to the society at present may contribute a lot to the society in the future.

Another important consideration is that when scholars and researchers do what they feel interested, they are able to do a better job. Nobody wants to do what others compel them to do. When people do what they like, they may devote all themselves to the work and their gift could be used best. For example, the famous Polish astronomer Copernicus who advanced the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun studied medicine when he entered the university, but he does not feel interested in it in fact and did not do a good job. Later when he turned to astronomy subject, he found it is really interesting, and contributed all himself to the research, at last he discovered the theory that change the whole world's wrong notion.

Admittedly, there is no denying that in some conditions research has to be limited by the society or government to make sure that the research does not go beyond the moral standard even though some scientists may feel interested in the results. As we know, some of the scientists tried to clone human beings which is forbidden by the government. However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient support to the claim that scholars and researchers should always be concerned if their work has contribution to the society. When the advantage and disadvantage of working with interests and working with thought of contributions to the society are carefully compared, the most striking conclusion is obvious.

Therefore, in conclusion, due to the above-mentioned reasons, I believe that scholars and researchers should not worry much about whether their work has a great contribution to the society, they should mainly work with their interests.
(465 words)

tomwangUID: 189768

5555... 怎么没人理俺

Gua_niu(蜗牛)UID: 193156

Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a
contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests,
however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."

正文：
Should scholars and researchers pursue their individual interests even though they are unusual or idiosyncratic? The complex nature of the above issue requires us to consider it on a case-by-case basis. In my point of view, I agree with the speaker. （有点矛盾吧，前面说了要分析，后面马上说我同意）My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

In the first place, the important reason in support of my view is that many research may seem to have nothing to do with the society's advancement, however, nobody can make sure that it will not have a tremendous effect to （on）the society in the future. For instance, when Albert Einstein was young, he always would like to think about the relation between time and space, which other people at that time may feel quite curious. However, during the Second World War, the A-bomb, which destroyed a whole city easily, is（was） just based on the theory of relativity. Under this circumstance, it is obvious that some research which seems to be useless to the society at present may contribute a lot to the society in the future.

Another important consideration is that when scholars and researchers do what they feel interested, they are able to do a better job. Nobody wants to do what others compel them to do. When people do what they like, they may devote all themselves to the work and their gift could be used best. （be made the best use）For example, the famous Polish astronomer Copernicus who advanced the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun （用日心说这个专有名词不更好吗）studied medicine when he entered the university, but he does not feel interested in it in fact and did not do a good job. Later when he turned to astronomy subject, he found it is （was）really interesting, and contributed all himself to the research, at last he discovered the theory that change the whole world's wrong notion.

Admittedly, there is no denying that in some conditions research has to be limited by the society or government to make sure that the research does not go beyond the moral standard even though some scientists may feel interested in the results. As we know, some of the scientists tried to clone human beings which is forbidden by the government. However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient support to the claim that scholars and researchers should always be concerned if their work has contribution to the society. When the advantage and disadvantage of working with interests and working with thought of contributions to the society are carefully compared, the most striking conclusion is obvious.

Therefore, in conclusion, due to the above-mentioned reasons, I believe that scholars and researchers should not worry much about whether their work has a great contribution to the society, they should mainly work with their interests.
(465 words)
基本思路很清晰，语言比较流利，但是语言好像质量不够，多读读范文，你可以将你的文章与北美范文中的那一篇比较一下，你会大有收获的。

eustaciaUID: 175283

Should scholars and researchers pursue their individual interests even though they are unusual or idiosyncratic? The complex nature of the above above 去掉 issue requires us to consider it on a case-by-case basis. In my point of view, I agree with the speaker. My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

In the first place, the important reason in support supporting of my view is that many recent research may seem to have nothing to do with the society's advancement nowadays, however, nobody can make sure that it will not have a tremendous effect to the society in the future. For instance, when Albert Einstein was young, he always would like to think about the relation between time and space, which other people at that time may feel quite curious. However, during the Second World War, the A-bomb, which destroyed a whole city easily, is just based on the theory of relativity 换个例子吧，能够轻而易举的毁灭一座城市的原子弹对大多数人来说是灾难rather than having a tremendous effect to the society 比如说提供了新能源也许会好些，小心把批卷子的鬼子吓倒哦. Under this circumstance, it is obvious that some research which seems to be useless to the society at present may contribute a lot to the society in the future 和前面的重复了，增加了字数，但影响了文章的结构.

Another important不要老用important consideration is that when scholars and researchers do what they feel interested, they are able to do a better job. Nobody wants to do what others compel them to do. When people do what they like, they may devote all themselves to the work and their giftgifts could be used best to do 和do用的太多，不像GRE作文. For example, the famous Polish astronomer Copernicus who advanced the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun studied medicine when he entered the the去掉 university, but he does not feel interested in it in fact and did not do a good job. Later when he turned to astronomy subject, he found it is really interesting, and contributed all himself to the research, at last he discovered the theory that change the whole world's wrong notion.

Admittedly, there is no denying that in some conditions research has to be limited sensed or supervised by the society or government to make sure that the research does not go beyond the moral standard even though some scientists may feel interested in the results. As we know, some of the scientists tried to clone human beings which 语法有问题，which会被理解为human beings，于是成了人类被政府禁止掉了 is forbidden by the government. However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient support to the claim that scholars and researchers should always be concerned if their work has contribution to the society 为什么不行？. When the advantage and disadvantage of working with interests and working with thought of contributions to the society are carefully compared, the most striking conclusion is obvious.

Therefore, in conclusion, due to the above-mentioned reasons, I believe that scholars and researchers should not worry too much about whether their work has a great contribution to the society, they should mainly work with their interests.
(465 words)

不错，第一篇文章就能把结构把握得如此清晰，真是不简单，只是语言再提高一些就好了，同一楼上蜗牛的建议。不过提醒一点，语言不是最重要的，主要是思想深度