寄托天下
查看: 879|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue110 0706G-自由女神作文互改小组】hema的第九次作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
10
寄托币
261
注册时间
2006-2-24
精华
0
帖子
7
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-1-31 15:07:43 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
110 "When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers." 汉:当我们研究历史时,我们变成了讲故事的人。因为我们无从直接知道过去发生的事情,必须通过一些证据来构建,所以历史研究是一个有创造成分的领域,而并非一个客观的学科。所有的历史学家都是讲故事的人(storyteller)。

Today more and more people consider historians as storytellers since people can not get know the past directly but construct it by interpreting evidences. However I do not think so because of their works, which are much more complex and more creative than telling stories, they are infinitely close to the true reality and different absolutely from stories.

On one hand, as an objective and true facts, history is pursued by the historians, who will do their best and try every way to make it out if possible. Nowadays the historians try to use the most advanced technology to carry out the truth of the history, Such as the element C-12. Researchers use this element, which can be found during the fossil or other method that made thousands yeas ago, to find out the precision time that the fossil appeared. As we do not know everything happened before, historians put a large number of the statistic about the antiquity events into the computer and carry out a simulation with these data. Even we can not see the things happened before, but we can reappearance the things through the modern technology, still we can not reappearance the event the same, we can infinite close to the truth.

One another hand, as those happened in the past which history concerned won’t rehappen in the modern world, we can only infinitely close to the true. So during the history study, as we only close to the true but not touch the true, historians have to make some necessary assumptions to construct to real history. However, even it is assumption, historians make it all based on the common sense and his creativity. The historians construct the past through their own analysis to the history events and connecting these events with the antiquity society. During the construction, the historians do their best to consider the every data and use everything them thought is useful in order to carry out an almost true and objective history to the face. And because of such assumption which can be nearly ignored,. Some people consider the historians so-called storyteller, which is really unfair to them.

Actually, as a matter of fact, objective and creative are both very important to the history study. Since history is the whole process of human being society developing and give us so many experiences and lessons as we develop today, objective means we must admin the history and get the right experiences to help us go ahead but not go on an wrong way because the history which are not true. And creative means as the history are only the isolated data having none ties with each other, we should use every simulation and analysis as we can to find out the relationship between them and get out an whole history which we can get many useful information and experiences from it.

In conclusion, a historian is not a storyteller but more than a storyteller, one not only tide the scattered events but also find out much more useful information from it, by its analysis and creative assumption.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
192
注册时间
2006-10-30
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2007-2-3 09:38:39 |只看该作者
110 "When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers." 汉:当我们研究历史时,我们变成了讲故事的人。因为我们无从直接知道过去发生的事情,必须通过一些证据来构建,所以历史研究是一个有创造成分的领域,而并非一个客观的学科。所有的历史学家都是讲故事的人(storyteller)。

Today more and more people consider historians as storytellers since是翻译成自从么?如果是这句话就有点问题了 people can not get know the past directly but construct it by interpreting evidences. However I do not think so,加个没关系吧,有时句子还是断一下好 because of their works, which are much more complex and more creative than telling stories, they are infinitely close to the true reality and different absolutely from stories.

On one hand, as an objective and true facts, history is pursued by the historians, who will do their best and try every way to make it out if possible. Nowadays the historians try to use the most advanced technology to carry out the truth of the history, Such as the element C-12. Researchers use this element, which can be found during换个词,不通 the fossil or other methods that made thousands yeas ago, to find out the precision time that the fossil appeared. As we do not know everything happened before, historians put a large number of the statistic about the antiquity events into the computer and carry out a simulation with these data. Even we can not see the things happened before, but we can reappearance the things through the modern technology, still we can not reappearance the event the same, we can infinite close to the truth.历史学家通过科技手段将历史复现

One another hand, as those happened in the past which history concerned won’t rehappen没这样造词的吧 in the modern world, we can only infinitely close to the true. So during the history study, as we only close to the true but not touch the true, historians have to make some necessary assumptions to construct to real history. However, even it is assumption, historians make it all based on the common sense and his creativity. The historians construct the past through their own analysis to the history events and connecting these events with the antiquity society. During the construction, the historians do their best to consider the every data and use everything them thought is useful in order to carry out an almost true and objective history to the face. And because of such assumption which can be nearly ignored,. Some people consider the historians so-called storyteller, which is really unfair to them.历史学家通过大量的史实加想象不构建历史

Actually, as a matter of fact, objective and creative are both very important to the history study*TS*. Since history is the whole process of human being society developing and give us so many experiences and lessons as we develop today, objective means we must admin the history and get the right experiences to help us go ahead but not go on an wrong way because the history which are not true. And creative means as the history are only the isolated data having none ties with each other, we should use every simulation and analysis as we can to find out the relationship between them and get out an whole history which we can get many useful information and experiences from it.最好来个小结,不过我没看明白这一段和前面两个有什么联系,想要说什么

In conclusion, a historian is not a storyteller but more than a storyteller, one not only tide the scattered events but also find out much more useful information from it, by its analysis and creative assumption.结尾比较好

整篇作文思路清楚,已经了解了作文的写法,论证还要更加深入,尽量展开呵呵,写得比我好多啦!

使用道具 举报

RE: issue110 0706G-自由女神作文互改小组】hema的第九次作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue110 0706G-自由女神作文互改小组】hema的第九次作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-601271-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部