issue153@@A dream@@by小小amy

小小amyUID: 2541111

153"Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."
学生应该怀疑任何所学的东西，质疑被教的内容，而不是被动的接受。

提纲
初看一眼觉得很有道理，以怀疑的态度学习可以创新并改进知识体系knowledge hierarchy；但是仔细一想，论断太过于绝对，本人只能有保留地赞同。怀疑的态度学习可以创新并改进知识体系，但是由于知识的限制学生不适合过于怀疑。
质疑旧事物以得出更正确的结论是推动人类文明的一个重要手段。众多示例证明旧理论体系被好怀疑的人发现破绽甚至予以推翻。（下文的例子好像举的不是很好。。。能再帮想个不）
学生的的本职就是学习，在自己的知识体系尚未形成的时候，有何能力来质疑所学的。这些深层次的研究，需要相当的知识背景和熟练的操作能力，学者比学生更适合来进行这个质疑旧知识的任务。
学生被动的学习确实不好，但是以怀疑态度来学就能好好吸收知识么？或许可以获得个别学生的创新与改造，但是那是大多数人所做不到的事。而这大多数人学不好知识，还没有对其融会贯通，怎么有资格去怀疑并找寻漏洞错误呢。
有资历的学生和学者应该怀着创新的理念去学习，不断的来发现新的问题和答案。而普通人，也应尽力改善被动的学习方式，以不枯燥不古板的方式来为学习添加趣味，从而做一个合格的学习者。这样才能达到学习的初忠：学以致用起来。

At the first glance of the issue, I think it is right about the skepticism during learning, which can promote to refresh a better knowledge for people. But the statement the author holds is too assertive that I can only agree with reservation. The attitude of doubt on the teaching can certainly increase creations and improve the system of knowledge, what should be noticed is that, due to limit of their acquired knowledge, the students are not proper to be the subject who holds skeptical question toward what’s going to be taught.

Skepticism is an important way for people to draw better conclusion from the old studies and to tell those wrongs, which will raise the level of human civilization. It is this attitude making people dare to doubt about the so-called truth and develop their own study. Darwin doubted about the theology and brought up his theory, which is still accepted now, human used to be monkeys before evolution. This was news out of blue for religion believers, but it is this outcome set the new milestone for biology, somatology and so on. If people are never suspicious about the existence of god, these sciences would develop much slower.

It is students’ duty to learn while they usually don’t have the ability to doubt about what is passed on them, on the condition their own knowledge structures are not well-formed. If presenters’ studies could overturn the old ones, the presenters need to be very familiar about the back fields and possess a requested manipulating ability. Who have these abilities will usually turn out to be scholars and experts. Few can be students who are on their ways learning. So I think it should be the qualified people, most likely, not the students, to hold skeptical attitude to what they are learning.

It is not good for students to study passively, but does it link to the necessary those students should all doubt what is taught. Will suspicious spirit work on students and help them with their passive learning problems? I don’t think so. The attitude whether the students learn it passively or not is due to their own interests. Further more, even a student with poor foundation learn things with skepticism, the question will be, what kind of outcome can be brought out by such a student. Suppose achievements are made thanking to students’ doubt, how many of them will occur? The answer is absolutely few. The majority of students are not good enough to make achievements like those qualified do. If the students aren’t interested in learning then what the use of suspicion as he holds anyway? The main task of this group of students is to do their real job--try more effective measures and change their passive learning styles.

In sum, high talented and qualified students and other experts like scholars should learn with skepticism, to foster their capability to create new ideas and question the old, so that the whole science and academic field can be making progress all the time. For those who are average and not qualified, changes should be promoted to foster new learning habits, in the other saying is, to relinquish old passive attitude towards knowledge and to become a student up to standard. All of these can make the knowledge useful and be applied in our life, which is the original goal why we study.

wobaobao519UID: 2605404

Taken!
Wait, please!!

wobaobao519UID: 2605404

153"Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."
学生应该怀疑任何所学的东西，质疑被教的内容，而不是被动的接受。

提纲
初看一眼觉得很有道理，以怀疑的态度学习可以创新并改进知识体系knowledge hierarchy；但是仔细一想，论断太过于绝对，本人只能有保留地赞同。怀疑的态度学习可以创新并改进知识体系，但是由于知识的限制学生不适合过于怀疑。
质疑旧事物以得出更正确的结论是推动人类文明的一个重要手段。众多示例证明旧理论体系被好怀疑的人发现破绽甚至予以推翻。（下文的例子好像举的不是很好。。。能再帮想个不）————我从来都不擅长这个，sigh
学生的的本职就是学习，在自己的知识体系尚未形成的时候，有何能力来质疑所学的。这些深层次的研究，需要相当的知识背景和熟练的操作能力，学者比学生更适合来进行这个质疑旧知识的任务。
学生被动的学习确实不好，但是以怀疑态度来学就能好好吸收知识么？或许可以获得个别学生的创新与改造，但是那是大多数人所做不到的事。而这大多数人学不好知识，还没有对其融会贯通，怎么有资格去怀疑并找寻漏洞错误呢。
有资历的学生和学者应该怀着创新的理念去学习，不断的来发现新的问题和答案。而普通人，也应尽力改善被动的学习方式，以不枯燥不古板的方式来为学习添加趣味，从而做一个合格的学习者。这样才能达到学习的初忠：学以致用起来。


At the first glance of the issue, I think it is right about the skepticism during learning, which can promote to refresh a better knowledge for people. But the statement the author holds is too assertive that I can only agree with reservation. The attitude of doubt on the teaching can certainly increase creations and improve the system of knowledge, what should be noticed is that, due to limit of their acquired knowledge, the students are not proper to be the subject（复数，小happy 一下，找到你的错误了~~~） who holds （同样）skeptical question toward what’s going to be taught.

Skepticism is an important way（我觉得这里用way 不是很好，你前面说的是怀疑论， 可能你前面用怀疑会好一些） for people to draw better conclusion from the old studies and to tell those wrongs, which will raise the level of human civilization. It is this attitude making people dare to doubt about the so-called truth and develop their own study. Darwin doubted about the theology and brought up his theory, which is still accepted now, human used to be monkeys before evolution. This was news out of blue for religion believers, but it is this outcome set the new milestone for biology, somatology and so on. If people are never suspicious about the existence of god, these sciences would develop much slower.

It is students’ duty to learn while they usually don’t have the ability to doubt about what is passed on them, on the condition their own knowledge structures are not well-formed. If presenters’(？推荐者？) studies could overturn the old ones, the presenters need to be very familiar about the back fields and possess a requested manipulating ability. Who have these abilities will usually turn out to be scholars and experts. Few can be students who are on their ways learning. So I think it should be the qualified people, most likely, not the students, to hold skeptical attitude to what they are learning.（从文章这里给我的感觉是说学生不要质疑，而前面来说，你的态度是不过于怀疑，我觉得这两者是有区别的。不过，这是因为你给我看了你的提纲，不看我是不知道的~~）

It is not good for students to study passively, but does it link to the necessary those students should all doubt what is taught（小女子不才，看不懂，解释一下哈~~）. Will suspicious spirit work on students and help them with their passive learning problems? I don’t think so. The attitude whether the students learn it passively or not is due to their own interests. （这里详细说一下可能会更好）Further more, even （？even?）a student with poor foundation learn things with skepticism, the question will be, what kind of outcome can be brought out by such a student. Suppose achievements are made thanking to students’ doubt, how many of them will occur? (我觉得这里有问题，应该你想表达的意思是转折吧，但是看不出来还是我错了？)The answer is absolutely few. The majority of students are not good enough to make achievements like those qualified do. If the students aren’t interested in learning then what the use of suspicion as he holds anyway? （对学习不感兴趣和学得不好，没有足够的知识还是有差别的吧）The main task of this group of students is to do their real job--try more effective measures and change their passive learning styles（好像你的前面并没有提到被动的接受吧，这里冒出来一下很突然）.

In sum, high talented and qualified students（疑问：我不确定，前面说了反例，但是没有提到这个，这样的表达在结尾的时候可不可以，好不好？）and other experts like scholars should learn with skepticism, to foster their capability to create new ideas and question the old, so that the whole science and academic field can be making progress all the time. For those who are average and not qualified, changes should be promoted to foster new learning habits, in the other saying is, to relinquish old passive attitude towards knowledge and to become a student up to standard. All of these can make the knowledge useful and be applied in our life, which is the original goal why we study.
整体来说：我觉得你的这篇比你的上篇更像AW的写作，第四段我觉得有一些问题，我们俩在逻辑上都还要加强吧！！

cherry_916UID: 2621641

At the first glance of the issue, I think it is reasonable(这里的词用的有些简单) about the skepticism during learning, which can promote to refresh a better knowledge for people. But the statement the author holds is too assertive that I can only agree with reservation. The attitude of doubt on the teaching can certainly increase creations and improve the system of knowledge, what should be noticed is that, due to limit of their acquired knowledge, the students are not proper to be the subject who hold skeptical questions toward what’s going to be taught.

Skepticism is an important way for people to draw better conclusion from the old studies and to tell those wrongs, which will raise the level of human civilization. It is this attitude making people dare to doubt about the so-called truth and develop their own study. (这句语法有问题吧，改成这样看会不会更好：It is obvious that this attitude can make people dare to doubt about the so-called truth and develop their own study.如果你用原话，你要把前后两个动词的形式重新定义一下，用一般现在时还是现在进行时)Darwin doubted about the theology and brought up his theory, which is still accepted now, human used to be monkeys before evolution. This was news out of blue for religion believers, but it is （it is 可以删掉吧）this outcome sets the new milestone for biology, somatology and so on. If people are never suspicious about the existence of god, these sciences would develop much slower. Doubt 重复使用了，还可以用suspect来替换，你看用地心说和日心说来论证是不是更好呢？
It is students’ duties to learn while they usually don’t（尽量把否定形式改成do not，更符合英语书写格式） have the ability to doubt about what is passed on them, on the condition their own knowledge structures are not well-formed. If presenters?’ studies could overturn the old ones, the presenters need to be very familiar about the backfields and possess a requested manipulating ability. The one who have these abilities will usually turn out to be scholars and experts. Few can be students who are on their ways learning. So(so 一般不放在句首，可以用therefore, hence,consequently) I think it should be the qualified people, most likely, not the students, to hold skeptical attitude to what they are learning.

It is not good for students to study passively, but does it link to the necessary those students should all doubt what is taught. Will suspicious spirit work on students and help them with their passive learning problems? I don’t think so(太过口语化了). The attitude whether the students learn it passively or not is due to their own interests. Further more, even a student with poor foundation learns things with skepticism, the question will be, what kind of outcomes can be brought out by such a student. Suppose achievements are made thanking to students’ doubt, how many of them will occur. The answer is absolutely few. The majority of students are not good enough to make achievements like those qualified do. If the students are not interested in learning then what the use of suspicion as he holds anyway? The main task of this group of students is to do their real job--try more effective measures and change their passive learning styles. （这段看的我有点晕啊）

In sum, high talented and qualified students and other experts like scholars should learn with skepticism, to foster their capability to create new ideas and question the old, so that the whole science and academic field can be making progress all the time. For those who are average and not qualified, changes should be promoted to foster new learning habits, in the other saying is, to relinquish old passive attitude towards knowledge and to become a student up to standard. All of these can make the knowledge useful and be applied in our life, which is the original goal why we study.

赞一个，句型结构和单词运用有些单一，要多积累点哦，有些论证可能还不是很深入