what!? fixed program structure, no flexibility on electives? normally a 1Y MSF still have a bit electives for some-called focus/stream to leave a bit room for more advanced / specialized course
and tons of general finance (CFA stuffs) for hard skill training!? way too interesting.....
it is a big joke to compare it with Schulich one in terms of hard skill. At least you can see things like core financial econometrics, elective course stochastic calculus, advanced derivatives there, while in the McGill one, you won't even find one single course in stat for finance, not to mention any graduate level price / risk modelling.....
from a maths point of view, this McGill one is weak one, not only from quant point of view, but also from MSF point of view when comparing with peers.
actually, I don't think hard skill training is important for those Chinese going to this MMF (since 反正沒有).
French skill is way more important...........getting a general finance supporting role after PR seems to be the most likely outcome.
P.S. at the end, who cares about a pre-experience soft master in finance in US/UK system (unless it is a top/target school like LBS MIT and etc...)?
If the company want a specialist, why not take someone in accounting, law, math & stat or CS?
If the company want a business generalist, there are tons of local bachelor from various famous university....
旋转长颈鹿 发表于 2017-2-15 22:23
Bro, you are too critical for a new program...haha
Being new is not a excuse for providing good/bad service......especially when the price (tuition fee!!!) will not be cheaper for a new one, not to mention the time cost.
Lack of electives is not something related to the age of the program too. It is likely either "the class size is too small" or "the department want to milk more from the students"
Lack of quantitative subject is again not something related to the age of the program. It is just a style - not something good or bad, just problem of fit or not. (and that's why it is called MMF instead of MSF - management instead of science)
Actually I don't think this McGill MMF is a very bad one - famous general university reputation but not famous business school, common general finance program structure, some industrial connection and internship to leverage. These are all good stuffs for some people.
imagine an Canadian students with a non-business bachelor, say art or social science. He/she speak some French, and want to work in Quebec. Then this is a decent soft master for switching to finance;
imagine a French business student (e.g. HEC or whatever) want to relocate to Quebece. This will be a decent one for him/her.
but this kind of soft finance master definitely don't fit most Chinese applicant - don't fit at all. 中国学生又多了一个读Finance的去处 is just 中国学生又多了一个读Finance的坑.
1. top tier university normally not focus business education at undergraduate, or pre-experience master level much, especially those non-technical one. They only care about MBA (practical) and PhD (academics research).
2. 中国人群体里的心理排名 doesn't depend on business school much, else Yale, Oxford, Cambridge wont have that highly-regarded.
3. Finance is a high-concentrated industry - most job are all in a few financial centres, leaving really a few elsewhere. Therefore I don't really understand the point of Quebec + Finance indeed....