- 最后登录
- 2013-8-12
- 在线时间
- 1090 小时
- 寄托币
- 763
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-16
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 4
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 609
- UID
- 2591908
![Rank: 4](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level3.gif)
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 763
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-16
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 4
|
本帖最后由 hunter101020 于 2009-3-29 10:08 编辑
144# ningning86
来了!
17. There are two types of laws:just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Does every individual has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust ones? I find this allegation to be specious. It wrongly suggests that laws can be devided into two types: just and unjust. In contrast, there are not such evaluation standerds for the laws.
To begin with, there are no such standerds to objectedly measure whether laws are just and unjust. Whether a law is just is mesured by (differrent)people, and people are not objective(人不是客观的与法律是不是客观的中间少逻辑虽然从你的文章看人决定法律但是否可以见自己的主观性加之于法律不一定可以说由于个体不同价值观角度不同对于同一法律不一定有统一认知). Some may think the law which is good for them are just, while the law against their goods are unjust. An example in case is that if we pass a law for increaing welfare for retired old people, the retired ones will be diligent, while companys may think it is unjust.Expect benefits, culture and ethics will also impact the people`s judgement, such as the law for artificial abortion, while someone think it is good for the unprepared mother , some others think it kills the life. And in some countrys, it allows one man married with two or three different women, which is accroding to the customs and cuture of their own, although others may think it it unequal for women. (举例很好前面论证时就对应地说由于经济道德文化风俗个人价值观的不同法律的公正与否对不同人来说是不一样的)
In addition,(我一般把in addtion放在倒数第二段看作是补的开头) for the very function of law is to bring stability and order to the group of peple (that the laws are enforced upon不要), the law should be obeyed equally among the population,(unless 应该是no matter 吧。。不确定) it is just or unjust. If the soldier did not obey the disciplies in war, you can imagine what a mass the armed forces would be. Just like this case(不能随便类比不是同一情况命令与法律怎么能等同呢), if somebody obey laws and somebody do not, our society would be a mass without any order. Laws must be compulsory, without it laws can not have its funciton, and our society can not survive.
However, besides compulsory, laws should also be adaptable and flexible in certain situations, places and times. (论述一下为什么假设论证什么的)Take United States as an example, they have different laws in different states. Although the written rules of law must be fixed and seldom changed, the people that enforce the laws, as well as those who judge those who break the laws, have responsibily to see whether justive is done. Moreover, things rarely remian the same over an extended period of time, that is to say, what is true in ten years ago maybe faulse today, take the human cloning for example, it is unbelievalbe five years ago, yet it is accepted by some countrys conditionally now.角度上没什么问题但每段主题句表达上不直白 有的因果论述缺乏逻辑举例一定要典型
In sum, the speaker fails to recognize that theare are no such objective standerds for indiivduals to judge whether laws are just or unjust and laws should be complusory which allows nobody disobey it though personally you think it is unequal. In the final analysis, we should obey rules whether you think the laws are right or wrong. |
|