- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=102340443 Y7 l/ ^& T* a9 H
; |% ] ^ Z' l, q3 g! f9 f( X* u$ M
上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。
9 g( w) q) q. @! u! M* i1 b/ }4 p4 s( Q: v+ w, e1 c
Qualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007. I Q7 d6 B7 j. L0 J n: u3 R$ K
8 M; `: B6 t# c( MHarvard University – Architecture. B$ |2 e3 W9 a8 H$ l; K# p8 \
• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture
5 A# n5 B3 N$ W P% wand Urban Design
" I# X7 `7 m7 G• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline
! w w% i4 [. b; L/ n• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth; K3 [ {2 u) Q- B
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought9 ~# t6 S- O1 u1 |& M! s7 }
• Breadth of world view9 @! h8 @) P; P v5 x
• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice
% J# w1 {0 q! ]: p% |# }( H• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students3 P) _' `3 S# S0 x4 E
• Good balance of theory and practice, very international& f/ V: ~# D" Q
4 J4 X' \( N$ h6 m" S' NUniversity of Cincinnati – Interior Design
" z/ T3 v5 H# h; ~' M• Active connections to the profession
& V, y5 w1 F( |; F• Strength of internship program9 U6 r$ D0 z9 a; Y" b$ G( @3 G9 _
• CIDA similar program: E$ x- T3 r3 p; _) l P. y4 D
• Strong technology base
9 _# K- L5 Q1 k+ Z: q• Strong overall undergraduate program5 ^2 Q% o4 G' g( u* J
• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior* S" M' x+ f; W8 J4 i2 w# W
Design and Architecture co-op/ C# R; Q8 ^. {# K
• Excellent co-programs
( r, q: H# S7 {• Direct competition for internships and jobs
$ ~) {& d& c) |/ m7 H/ O/ `• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students) x. l# v C. W1 ^
• Graduates appear to have good practical sense4 Z- h8 T+ T/ G6 i+ ~' B
; ^+ w& g5 D4 Y+ V7 m8 i
University of Virginia – Landscape Architecture
' h+ @0 N9 E& U/ {1 G• Attention to design and small town urbanism, y/ O+ |; \; e
• Quality of faculty
2 l* g' {6 [! [2 B• Students can choose from three tracts of study5 A* |9 t$ @% z1 U
• Good design research base in sustainable design
4 h' m) W: O& ]# v• Consistent and value oriented educational mission" J0 a) D* D* F. n9 O6 j
2 a6 S" D( \% p( l
7 {4 O4 G D; s9 I/ V* ]
Design Programs Most Admired* r' V2 L* b7 V5 g% e* a. t3 `* _9 `$ b
by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007 . w0 J8 n: k# ]7 y
) z. e' e. b+ @. {) ]- Z/ E/ OArchitecture4 L$ Y' q! T9 O, q: H3 I
1 Harvard University
4 _" p/ ~' o2 P3 T2 Auburn University
- z1 H/ ]- R! }( t. W) F4 D4 c/ zMassachusetts Institute of Technology
4 k# E4 O+ j$ \& _4 University of Michigan5 O; L; L% Z. X8 P$ w+ z! r5 [/ m
5 Columbia University4 f. X. ?* H1 H5 n; s
6 University of Pennsylvania; G( L- D: F" v: W# w y: H: t
University of Virginia
) G8 U9 K/ o5 |7 W7 d0 o7 Cornell University2 E- h# M7 E; l( E4 |7 A
Georgia Institute of Technology9 b( s6 K3 m, F1 D
University of California, Berkeley$ R& V( y D) U( {# Q
University of Minnesota
! P$ ?8 c! m( HYale University: m( r0 l9 Z: z3 i8 v8 `' R
% `7 l: Q& q3 _+ t* ?6 eLandscape Architecture0 t! P: N0 ~" I! |& x
1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada. X+ h, t6 x( m1 u* G
Harvard University1 Y& S6 y9 l* \8 h( Z' D
University of Virginia
8 R( e# f j, I# ?# l% y& q4 Pennsylvania State University
) m9 G! i: n$ X; CUniversity of Georgia
; W K9 X5 F! _9 j& rUniversity of Pennsylvania' J, j3 }+ O5 d' X& Q
7 California Polytechnic State University,
0 x2 H+ ~- C8 k0 t* m3 k' \* n' RSan Luis Obispo" m' y) }/ t5 p) c$ U
Kansas State University
6 }( V7 W) {0 FMichigan State University
/ R; b8 ^; Q4 g( \University of California, Davis9 |- b& Z3 S' E! g/ u/ v
0 e; @7 x! ?, [5 ^Interior Design
& ^9 D w4 H1 ]- B6 P R1 University of Cincinnati
+ T O- `) a5 b( P+ {6 N% R2 Rhode Island School of Design
& K1 X6 _: i! N# Q8 N* a7 p4 d3 Arizona State University
7 _6 M3 E3 S- C' ZCornell University. [- T- a8 ?) X2 a, P% q3 E8 @
Kansas State University0 t1 R% `4 h: m& Z6 P5 S
6 Art Center College of Design
. y! N- l$ L; A' h; p- X0 fArt Institute of Chicago8 q5 U! O0 l& B x" Z& k! e2 h
Florida State University0 _! d, d2 u3 n+ D8 j7 c
Lawrence Technological University9 ^; g# T/ O- V
Pratt Institute
+ U |7 @; u. d4 h/ ?/ b- F1 HUniversity of Oregon2 t. G# w6 g* ^' h" o4 Q
8 U1 E; o. [5 n) T- @& ]* YDesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
. f4 c9 I' \8 G& o+ {% O+ ^2 [% |0 Z% }
UNDERGRADUATE
( T# B: K6 x' g1 Cornell University. ?# m( J4 p0 u) j. b% N
2 Rice University
6 C2 s* X' z) y8 o9 |7 M3 Syracuse University
# i% e, H M& D: ?+ Y4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
6 B' \" Z: S& h- S7 U6 W5 Rhode Island School of Design+ B) y% H2 o' R# ?6 i7 r- p
6 Auburn University+ T: |0 ^0 R# f# Y* }8 R1 E1 y: Q5 I
6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
0 o5 _5 M% L. k3 h6 University of Kansas*
9 T; d1 ?' S4 r, d9 University of Texas at Austin* U! x/ n" k# X
10 Carnegie Mellon University
; }: g/ M0 R' q- ]+ n/ u11 University of Notre Dame8 Q2 j4 Q, f7 G2 N( L9 A# z" [
12 Kansas State University$ ` B* ?- L; i5 t. _
13 Illinois Institute of Technology! X; [; k% K, J* h# J7 B( l* d
14 Iowa State University
# o% c" \( b1 X! p14 Pratt Institute* B, Q( I* b" l ~ E$ W
14 University of Oregon
5 \; i0 e5 f' D14 University of Southern California& Y$ P% e A/ n0 l4 Z
- [* E) ~! R" \) X/ {' r1 |% _
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
: t. o; B+ i7 Q: l: {5 c/ E( V1 E* p5 ~7 x- n2 V
GRADUATE) F: Z) a7 T! Z) W1 f
1 Harvard University
$ B5 n! G. }. w( a6 R# M. z2 University of Cincinnati
9 `& ^8 `. K! o8 V4 i3 Yale University
7 u v: i& v# G; d* [& j7 G4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
% _# P; [1 G! [0 T2 [) t5 University of Virginia
' l$ S! P, P0 m0 r( k$ | p( ?6 Cornell University
" x+ C$ x/ M) R8 V- K3 v1 @6 Rice University! h" c% n! {) ?9 L, L! M! Z8 `& j
6 Washington University in St. Louis, q/ |. Y( R/ q Z) y. d" ]
9 Columbia University: y8 d' r( x0 p6 `( k: x
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
! c/ _+ K3 V! t: J+ C% j) ?11 Princeton University$ p# ^. y& V8 t7 A
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; a! ^& j1 u! l" }
11 University of Texas at Austin
c' }) \% l7 Y4 W i2 b( K u+ R: w5 ^14 Rhode Island School of Design
' c! a! [2 a/ @2 F1 w# r' l6 _) L% \15 University of Michigan
, M4 x# s% S0 E; j% z2 C/ Q) H1 M, }) M* j
DesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
8 x& `/ F8 _$ Y/ d1 x9 L: s2 f' r# T2 w2 E+ Y
UNDERGRADUATE " W: T" Y9 k0 K7 N0 n
School 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 9 A8 R9 D1 t M6 P: v. g
Cornell University 1 1 1 2 4 6 _! q, d5 r! v0 N& {1 h" j- Z4 I7 t
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10 3 e" P5 W( D! j
Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 -
0 s# `7 O* r9 n; [7 |. gVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
% K5 X8 ^; I/ A( X8 v5 `Rhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 -
9 E' h' w* t) tAuburn University 6 15 - - 10 $ R6 e( u9 v- T
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 2* Y! g. b6 n: A4 E
University of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -. s5 J6 ?. [' h4 D) Q8 t; I
University of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6/ v/ i* p- ~ R |$ ] z# J
Carnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -
8 A+ h7 i9 x2 i3 ?University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -, B3 \. u8 x0 H3 O3 `) P
Kansas State University 12 5 6 8 6; m, O* F8 X) u7 S4 Z
Illinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -
4 @! {' }6 i) z9 w# nIowa State University 14 13 12 11 -7 F9 m" R( E N1 @; n' r
Pratt Institute 14 10 - - -; d. ?+ P; {" t+ U2 n( @5 s
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -
) @4 u9 }' c) \! a% D2 `University of Southern California 14 - - - -9 A; I4 A8 { L& v9 t2 e! t# K
Ball State University‡ - - - - 14( p$ O8 J& D9 V0 Q
Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -, ^$ p: _6 ~% S
2 L; B; E5 o' ^+ V5 p4 Z2 N+ }
# K- W" S+ x2 w' B
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 20075 G; a" y3 y8 {/ v: R
* p& [& b6 D T$ U% W; t
UNDERGRADUATE7 g: q, c9 _3 w! r' `
1 Louisiana State University
8 \1 h7 J0 ~" q$ [( x; T: H1 Pennsylvania State University2 k8 L, g* u0 {% \. R& E
3 Kansas State University
/ B5 Q2 }/ W' Y6 p4 University of Georgia
! y- ^. q2 P' e5 Q p/ s5 a5 Ball State University
$ M2 t- d( j! P6 P5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
+ ?; ] @) Z6 T# b4 K, v5 Cornell University
3 j( j/ k0 i, m4 g$ c5 Purdue University% R) x8 q% w& m3 \; y9 F* J9 ^
9 Ohio State University
5 V4 j9 [+ r: K0 d: N10 Texas A&M University: ^4 k3 _# c8 H
11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona1 p- T7 z* t) F e& B; L( T( q
12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY# `$ ?7 |. F4 o' M# R
13 Michigan State University; g( f5 F# |0 H* |
13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
3 a' H0 A1 S! P/ W2 Z15 Iowa State University
, D% K" v7 Y% I% Z15 University of Oregon
& g/ I/ N0 u3 O3 |3 k15 University of Wisconsin-Madison
' [& n# i `4 I5 H' @- y8 q7 @# ?
% g# {4 E9 m% E3 y L: ?5 `Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007; @+ c0 [1 b4 w9 B6 t
, M, N6 I1 l; \" ]+ h0 U! |GRADUATE
2 x7 N" V2 }1 P/ w1 l6 Q1 Harvard University3 R1 M6 t4 Q; u/ f, x7 N) [
2 Kansas State University, n. q( J0 A7 C+ r
3 University of Georgia8 ?2 |4 I' M1 Q* z
4 University of Pennsylvania6 r2 I" ]6 a$ ~- j
5 Louisiana State University# a% t: h" `6 s# t8 Z5 a7 b
6 Rhode Island School of Design/ @# B* H+ k9 r5 s4 C- n' o
6 University of Michigan
3 U1 f5 j5 i; u& d# @6 University of Virginia5 S$ ]/ n% ?, @
9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
0 R- \% R; ]" F% Z9 Ohio State University- ] D7 V* E: X; R
11 Cornell University
: P6 p2 `3 f0 V11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
# B7 B+ c7 u, g" `13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
4 S; w$ E$ \# M. m) }/ g+ ?; E! K13 Texas A&M University
Y" c& G2 Z8 J) A ?13 University of California, Berkeley' b; x# W0 o+ @* Y
13 University of Oregon$ l6 B% \, r9 }& ]2 A& ?/ p
4 i ]; z! y9 _
Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
3 G. y) m! [. H& C9 b( uThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.
- s/ r! n% |9 j+ d+ t5 n: r* w& ^2 u5 f, q
Design:
! `* J0 ?: I& ]) }1. Harvard University
# V7 }; T* [. u. O% J, Y! A+ W- q1 M2. Kansas State University
" k$ w1 c3 l2 k% g, S: y, g3. Louisiana State University3 ?( g) Y+ R& _3 A9 H0 m1 D) Z
4. Pennsylvania State University
7 h% d9 `/ c% w: r$ h5. Ball State University
# G9 S4 R4 W3 Q1 W" C! K0 E+ ]3 @2 Y2 v1 m9 D
Analysis and planning:
% x Q3 h; L" l& R1 c3 Z1. Kansas State University3 N7 j' M6 S: n" g( s& P
2. Pennsylvania State University
1 w4 M- p0 |+ K. @3. Louisiana State University [, l- q7 P( U7 r& U0 G
University of Georgia8 J; ~$ L% G; [/ d6 A: \8 x; f! R* }
5. Harvard University- u' r) |" K& x
% [) D+ o2 Y4 _2 o
Construction methods and materials:
9 I- W* t9 \" x$ L1. Kansas State University
; @6 z! G( J6 R2. University of Georgia
8 q8 ?: h g# k0 l6 ]- E# _3. Louisiana State University
: D+ |3 ?, Q& d9 k6 t* FPennsylvania State University
: a9 Z7 F+ _( {9 s% JPurdue University
: O$ ? i/ G4 g& j) m# f/ G$ q$ f9 [- G* ~/ J, F
Computer applications:
6 X% F3 J% r; d2 t, l1. Harvard University
9 S) |; p0 Q- ^2. Pennsylvania State University& |& Z! F0 f/ v; F" v% m
3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
9 O- Y O# E& C# Q6 _% ?Purdue University0 v. h4 H. G6 A r5 X
University of Georgia
7 `" `' F3 I7 k' h- e7 o2 {# l" l
' j" d& |! m+ ^9 `' t+ Z+ RResearch and theory:
2 q8 Z* h% H+ A6 j5 y% {1. Harvard University
( S3 h# Z% ]$ s. |! _2. Pennsylvania State University6 p6 `1 {/ R+ P9 X
3. Kansas State University
# z7 g! }$ b7 [+ RUniversity of Georgia
/ ^. S4 {* D" ~4 x1 j9 e5. University of Oregon& F3 d1 S" v: u& n
University of Virginia9 d. B3 E2 b( `3 G! |- s
+ D. s, n) T j3 b: RSecurity design principles:0 B' A: g' L* \. `* {
1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo* m0 T6 }) n1 x. G4 o! p i4 C2 W
Kansas State University
0 c+ d, E" F! A: _University of Georgia& p( x' E1 s% I6 t3 t
4. Ball State University! x% H2 m; n: }# e
5. Pennsylvania State University
# Q- Y, {9 ~1 F2 n/ \1 G; |2 p! m
6 q. b* J6 O- Y: |) m# O) gSustainable design practices and principles:
/ T* U: \8 c$ v1. University of Georgia
) t Z" f. [; i% u* v) w AUniversity of Oregon
8 ]8 H* i1 }; f7 I8 F' h: o3. Pennsylvania State University2 C' b# t3 J" u7 n0 G# M
4. Ball State University
3 Y. u& V! x3 k5 T6 ~. n1 HCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
. b: |$ s; Y; J" qHarvard University2 A' D4 h6 S9 x! _* I1 v
Kansas State University% e( C& X& w5 F# i5 W
Michigan State University
/ S/ _6 E$ ~5 q! P, t/ i6 Q
( l7 g2 F# r: @- `9 [ c[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|