本帖最后由 tesolchina 于 2015-5-31 22:03 编辑
71). The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times.
"Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just completed. Members of the town council already have suggested more road building to address the problem, but as well as being expensive, the new construction will surely disrupt some of our residential neighborhoods. It would be better to follow the example of the nearby city of Garville. Last year Garville implemented a policy that rewards people who share rides to work, giving them coupons for free gas. Pollution levels in Garville have dropped since the policy was implemented, and people from Garville tell me that commuting times have fallen considerably. There is no reason why a policy like Garville's shouldn't work equally well in Waymarsh."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
My response:
According to the letter, Waymarsh should introduce a policy similar to that of Garville to encourage more drivers to share rides with others to solve a perceived traffic problem. This policy will be better than the road building project proposed by the city council. To evaluate this argument, we need more evidence about the surveys indicating the traffic problem, the policy implemented in Garville that is now proposed for Waymarsh, as well as its strengths and weaknesses relative to the road construction plan.
To begin with, we need to examine the surveys more critically to decide if there is indeed a traffic problem in Waymarsh. On the one hand, with the environmental problems becoming more severe, more and more people prefer to live in the suburb area. Obviously, their commuting time will increase if they still work in the city center. On the other hand, the subjects in the two surveys may be different. For instance, during these years, the development of Waymarsh have attracted many young people to come and work in there. However, due to the high house price, they couldn’t afford buying a house in the city immediately and they had to live far away from the city center where they worked. And most subjects in the latter survey were this kind of person. Three years before, most people interviewed by reporter were local people, whose family had lived in city center for a long time. Thus, more information about the survey has to be given in order to correctly evaluate it.
On the one hand, with the environmental problems becoming more severe, more and more people prefer to live in the suburb area. 你这句话好像是在陈述事实 这个是不对的 argument很多讨论都是可能性
due to the high house price, 这完全是你自己YY的吧
你只能说有这种可能性
interviewed by reporter 是survey 不是interview
In addition, we need to collect more information about how the policy has changed the traffic in Garvile and how a similar policy will affect people’s behaviors in Waymarsh. For instance, the government might also implemented a strict policy in order to control the pollution emission at the same time. In other word, maybe the decrease of the pollution level was not caused by the rides-sharing policy. Further, more compelling evidence the arguer should give about whether the commute time in Garville was really decrease. Maybe people being interviewed didn’t want to say negative things about their hometown. Plus, even though the rides-sharing policy was effective in Garville, this policy may not be accepted by Waymarsh people, as most people live in Waymarsh are wealthy and thus concern more about privacy and safety.
implemented a strict policy on what?
pollution emission from where?
Maybe people being interviewed didn’t want to say negative things about their hometown. 你以为这是天朝啊
Finally, we need to compare the cost and benefits of the ride sharing policy with the proposed road and project. The arguer failed to give evidence such as data to support his or her statement. To illustrate, the road can be used for at least 30 years and thus it is an one-off investment. Compared with giving people coupons for free gas for 30 years, constructing road may even be a more cost-effective way. Additionally, the government can also give some compensation fees to people when constructing the roads, and this also might save much more money of the government. Accordingly, the author should give more quantitative data to bolster his or her idea.
The arguer failed to give evidence such as data to support his or her statement. what statement?
2015/5/31 Second edition
My response:
According to the letter, Waymarsh should introduce a policy similar to that of Garville to encourage more drivers to share rides with others to solve a perceived traffic problem. This policy will be better than the road building project proposed by the city council. To evaluate this argument, we need more evidence about the surveys indicating the traffic problem, the policy implemented in Garville that is now proposed for Waymarsh, as well as its strengths and weaknesses relative to the road construction plan.
先粘贴到notepad里再贴过来 可免去word里的格式
To begin with, we need to examine the surveys more critically to decide if there is indeed a traffic problem in Waymarsh. Maybe the environmental problem in the Waymarsh becomes increasingly severe and thus renders more people move outside. Consequently, they spend much time on commuting to the work. Plus, the subjects in the two surveys may be different. For instance, maybe most of the subjects in the first survey are local people and have been living in the city center for a long time. While most of the subjects in the latter interview are new comers of the city and have to live far away from the city center where they work. Therefore, the commuting time of the latter subjects is incredibly longer than the former subjects. Thus, more information about the survey has to be given in order to correctly evaluate it.
move outside - move further away from the city center
latter subjects- latter group of subjects 写得不错 在我的思路基础上自己想了其他可能性
In addition, we need to collect more information about how the policy has changed the traffic in Garvile and how a similar policy will affect people's behaviors in Waymarsh. For instance, the government might also implemented a strict policy on industry in order to control the pollution emission from the factories and coal mines at the same time. In other word, maybe the decrease of the pollution level was not caused by the rides-sharing policy. Further, more compelling evidence the arguer should give about whether the commute time in Garville was really decrease. The statement from residents is subjective and hence can't reflect the true fact precisely. Plus, even though the rides-sharing policy was effective in Garville, this policy may not be accepted by Waymarsh people, as most people live in Waymarsh are wealthy and thus concern more about privacy and safety.
might also implemented 这种问题要自己检查一下 In other words这句写得不错
Further, more compelling evidence the arguer should give about whether the commute time in Garville was really decrease. 这个宾语前置看起来很高大上的样子 这个句型我不是很熟 你可以找几句范文给我看看 was really decrease 这个低级语法错误把句子给毁了
Finally, we need to compare the cost and benefits of the ride sharing policy with the proposed road and project. The arguer failed to give evidence such as data to support his or her statement that constructing road is a less cost-effective way. To illustrate, the road can be used for at least 30 years and thus it is an one-off investment. Compared with giving people coupons for free gas for 30 years, constructing road may even be a more cost-effective way. Additionally, the government can also give some compensation fees to people when constructing the roads, and this also might save much more money of the government. Accordingly, the author should give more quantative data to bolster his or her idea.
give evidence such as data 表达
the government can also give some compensation fees to people when constructing the roads, and this also might save much more money of the government.这句的意思有问题 提出赔偿的意义在于将隐形的成本转化为账面成本 然后和其他项目的成本做对比 你这个点写不出来的话 说compensation 就不通了
compensation fees 表达
|