- 最后登录
- 2007-12-6
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 2247
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-9
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 1899
- UID
- 2107695
![Rank: 5](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 5](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level1.gif)
- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 2247
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-9
- 精华
- 2
- 帖子
- 0
|
Issue99 “ In any realm of life-whether academic, social, business, or political-the only way to succeed is to take a practical, rather than an idealistic, point of view. Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival, whereas idealistic views tend to be superseded by simpler, more immediate options.”
限时完全版,写的啥我自己都不知道.字数就不说了,第2段严重走题.拿出来给大家长信心
sign~
The speaker asserts that practical way is the only approach to success, and it is pragmatic behavior, rather than idealistic views, that guarantees survival. As far as I am concerned, however, [这个句式重复的也太多了吧]without regard[respect? regarding] to idealistic views it would be hard to achieve success in any realm of life-be it academic, or political, though more often than not, it is pragmatic behavior that helps us survive.
In our time when efficiency is highly valued, pragmatic behavior is both necessary and crucial in realms such as academia and politics. Take historians for example. Instead of making stories from no more than assumptions and imaginations, they have to base their work on the available materials: those historical documents and [recorded ]unearthed by the [aerologists你笑死我了]. What is more, our developed technology has recorded almost every[ big event 我酝酿了半天不笑出来。我在图书馆啊!!你就不能用significant么]happened on this planet, allowing little room for historians to interpret the past with any idealistic views. When historians are more and more reduced to translators of historical records, pragmatic behavior, other than idealistic views, is more significant. Anyhow, the importance of practical way is not only limited to the study of history, but to many other mainstream inquires as well. Physics, social science, humanities are all teeming with information; many existed problems cannot be solved unless people rely on them for analysis[for doing看着更顺眼]. When it comes to politics, what is most urgent is to ensure that most members in a society can pay for their bread and rent. In light of this, no matter how complex and perplexed a policy may sound, eventually it is supposed to solve these problems, which also calls for practical approaches.
Nevertheless, pragmatic behavior can not bring us long-term success, with idealistic views are[being] absent. When the formal[former] Soviet Union rivaled the United States in the famous "Star War Defense Initiative ", [,”]this expensive arm race worsened the economy of the Soviet Union and finally led to the collapse of the economic situation nationwide years later. [At the earlier time period awkward], Deng Xiaoping advocated “Open up[不需要up] Policy”, emphasizing the importance of cross national communication and commerce. Though faced with many objections and abuses, this policy had finally proven to considerably promote the economy of China in 1980’s/ and now]. The contrasting examples show us that idealistic views usually rend their merit in the future, as did of “Open up Policy”, and narrowing the focus to the present issues, illustrated by the collapse of the Soviet Union’s economy, will bring us negative and disastrous result. [我怎么觉得开放政策正是出于现实的考虑呢。要是出于理想就共产主义了。外国人也是这么理解的吧。]
In conclusion, it is presumptuous to judge practical way as the only approach to success, since in long-term achievement idealistic views always play a part and parcel role. However, this is not to say pragmatic behavior is not [as/] important, for in academic and political realms, they help us deal with the available information and existed[ing] problems.
[你的语言很不错,句子之间的衔接也很好。但第二段关于历史研究的那部分不知道你在说什么。还有邓小平的例子用反了。另外没看懂你在说苏联是理想主义还是现实主义。如果是前者的话有问题。它确实不够审慎,但也不是出于理想而和美国竞争啊。] |
|