寄托天下
查看: 1480|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] 新G Argument36 求拍 [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
15
寄托币
46
注册时间
2012-1-9
精华
0
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-7 17:22:28 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 DREAMER002 于 2012-4-11 19:31 编辑

5.13母亲节大阪考,Argument第一篇未限时题目:A36

The following report appeared in the newsletter of theWest Meria Public Health Council.

"An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East Meria, where fish consumption is very high, people visit the doctor only once or twice per year for the treatment of colds. Clearly, eating a substantial amount of fish can prevent colds. Since colds represent the most frequently given reason for absences from school and work, we recommend the daily use of Ichthaid—a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil—as a good way to prevent colds and lower absenteeism."


Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.


求指导

This argument appears to be sound at first glance, but further reflection reveals that it is far from thoroughly reasonable. While eating a wealth of fish might help prevent colds according to the study, the author fails to establish its causal relationship with absenteeism in schools and workplaces, not to mention the supplement Ichthaid derived from fish oil. As far as I amconcerned, the argument suffers from the following flaws which render it unpersuasive as it stands.

In the argument, the author claims that colds represent the most frequently given reason for absences from school and work. Based upon this assumption, the author implies that in order to reduce absenteeism, efforts should be made to the prevention of colds. However, there is no direct evidence to support that colds have any crucial relationship with people’s absences even though they constantly give the reason of colds. It is possible that a number of people might merely take colds as an excuse for their absences. Also, probably they mistake it for colds while actually they suffer from adisease with similar symptoms which may have confused them. Moreover, itis unknown where and how this assumption is concluded. Maybe it comes from a biased survey, where only a small amount of people are selected. Only does the author provide sufficient information to demonstrate that absenteeism has significant connections with colds, can he or she assert that absences would be reduced by preventing colds.


Citing a study in nearby East Meria, the author draws the conclusion that colds can be prevented by eating plenty of fish. In this study, it is reported that in nearby East Meria where fish consumption is very high, people only get treated for colds once or twice every year. But this study has not established a direct relationship between eating more fish and getting fewer colds. We do not know that people there rarely visit the doctor for colds because they consume substantial amount of fish or it is owing to other reasons. Perhaps people in East Meria like sports and they are in good health, so they seldom catch colds, rather than because they eat fish in large quantities. Besides, it is possible that not everybody would go to see a doctor even when having a cold. It is also unclear what amount of fish do these people studied eat everyday and which percentage of them only need to get treated for colds once or twice every year.Thus, without rendering more understandable evidences ensure that more fish lead to fewer colds, this study cannot sufficiently substantiate that people can prevent colds by eating plenty of fish.


Finally, granted that eating volumes of fish can prevent colds and improve attendance, yet we cannot conclude that the supplement Ichthaid would be as effective asfish. Although Ichthaid is derived from fish oil, this argument reveals no proof that Ichthaid would have the same effect as fish on preventing colds, and especially fish has so diverse compositions that it is indefinite if it is fish oil that can prevent colds. The author would have to provide potent evidence that this supplement can prevent colds in the same way as fish does.


Overall, this argument lacks sufficientevidence to show that people are absent from school and work actually because they catch colds and by eating plenty of fish they can prevent colds, and then improve attendance. In addition, an investigation is necessary to demonstrate that the supplement Ichthaid has the same effect as fish on preventing colds.



想多远,就走多远。
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
586
寄托币
7280
注册时间
2010-4-12
精华
2
帖子
365

荣誉版主 Pisces双鱼座

沙发
发表于 2012-4-9 18:29:19 |只看该作者
This argument appears to be sound at first glance, but further reflection reveals that it is far from thoroughly reasonable. While eating a wealth offish might help prevent colds according to the study, the author fails to establish its causal relationship with absenteeism in schools and workplaces, not to mention the supplement Ichthaid derived from fish oil. As far as I am concerned, the argument suffers from the following flaws which render it unpersuasive as it stands.

In the argument, the author claims that colds represent the most frequently given reason for absences from school and work. Based upon this assumption, the author implies that in order to reduce absenteeism, efforts should be made to the prevention of colds. However, there is no direct evidence to support that colds have any crucial relationship with people’s absences even though they constantly give the reason of colds. It is possible that a number of people might merely take colds as an excuse for their absences. Also, probably they mistake it for colds while actually they suffer from a disease with similar symptoms which may have confused them. Moreover, it is unknown where and how this assumption is concluded. Maybe it comes from a biased survey, where only a small amount of people are selected. Only does the author provide sufficient information to demonstrate that absenteeism has significant connections with colds, can he or she assert that absences would be reduced by preventing colds.

Citing a study in nearby East Meria, the author draws the conclusion that colds can be prevented by eating plenty of fish. In this study, it is reported that in nearby East Meria where fish consumption is very high, people only get treated for colds once or twice every year. But this study has not established a direct relationship between eating more fish and getting fewer colds. We do not know that people there rarely visit the doctor for colds because they consume substantial amount of fish or it is owing to other reasons. Perhaps people in East Meria like sports and they are in good health, so they seldom catch colds, rather than because they eat fish in large quantities. Besides, it is possible that not everybody would go to see a doctor even when having a cold. It is also unclear what amount of fish do these people studied eat everyday and which percentage of them only need to get treated for colds once or twice every year. Thus, without rendering more understandable evidences ensure that more fish lead to fewer colds, this study cannot sufficiently substantiate that people can prevent colds by eating plenty of fish.
Finally, granted that eating volumes of fish can prevent colds and improve attendance, yet we cannot conclude that the supplement Ichthaid would be as effective as fish. Although Ichthaid is derived from fish oil, this argument reveals no proof that Ichthaid would have the same effect as fish on preventing colds, and especially fish has so diverse compositions that it is indefinite if it is fish oil that can prevent colds. The author would have to provide potent evidence that this supplement can prevent colds in the same way as fish does.


Overall, this argument lacks sufficient evidence to show that people are absent from school and work actually because they catch colds and by eating plenty of fish they can prevent colds, and then improve attendance. In addition, an investigation is necessary to demonstrate that the supplement Ichthaid has the same effect as fish on preventing colds.
徘徊记忆的边缘,当年几点深情,如遥灵,为盈盈一笑,斜阳染幽草;昔日几许仗义,似遥如,相伴而行,莫失莫忘。壮志凌云几分愁,知己难逢几人留,当初诺言,沧海桑田,流走的时光越来越远,还能再记得他们,十几二十几的年龄,如花似梦,是他们是我们最美丽的相逢,花开花落望穿多少个秋。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
586
寄托币
7280
注册时间
2010-4-12
精华
2
帖子
365

荣誉版主 Pisces双鱼座

板凳
发表于 2012-4-9 18:29:41 |只看该作者
nice job
建议发帖之前先排下版。
徘徊记忆的边缘,当年几点深情,如遥灵,为盈盈一笑,斜阳染幽草;昔日几许仗义,似遥如,相伴而行,莫失莫忘。壮志凌云几分愁,知己难逢几人留,当初诺言,沧海桑田,流走的时光越来越远,还能再记得他们,十几二十几的年龄,如花似梦,是他们是我们最美丽的相逢,花开花落望穿多少个秋。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
15
寄托币
46
注册时间
2012-1-9
精华
0
帖子
1
地板
发表于 2012-4-11 19:24:20 |只看该作者
谢谢版主指点,以后一定注意。
想多远,就走多远。

使用道具 举报

RE: 新G Argument36 求拍 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
新G Argument36 求拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1354475-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部