寄托天下
查看: 1105|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue 159 by 吕男 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
404
注册时间
2009-7-30
精华
0
帖子
19
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-22 00:10:35 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 huashiyiqike 于 2010-7-22 00:12 编辑

will human mind always be superior to machines? if judged on the foundation that the machines are and always will be only
human's tools, this assertion is definitely true. adversely, a historical view or a reflection of the relationship between
human and machine will challenge this saying.


machines, as they are defined, has long been the best servants of human race. from the ancient invention of bows to the newly
emergence of cameras , we have benefited so much both physically and spiritually from them. thanks to creativity of human
beings that we have bring out so many kinds of machines to facilitate and placate ourselves. there is no doubt that we will
step into the future with the company of our updated machines.


but when it comes to the future, nothing is predictable, including the issue that whether machines will keep their loyalty
and serve people while they are more intelligent and stronger than human race. the research of intelligent robots has made
great breakthrough, and is most likely to keep being ranked as one of the
hottest scientific field. the technology trends

has inspired Asimov, one of the best scientific fiction writers, to lay out the Three Laws of Robotics, in which the people's
absolutely control of robot is required in case of machine's harm to mankind. in view of people's creativity, these laws are
no jokes but serious moral principles of the researchers. after the computer controlled intelligent robots are successfully
made, the circulation of virus can be the human's worst dream. in the movie of Matrixs, we have already seen the disaster of
rebelling machines. afterall, anything may happen in the future, even something we do not want, like being the tools of our
own machines.


moreover, we may already have been controlled by our machines in an unnoticeable way. as our machines are turning to be more
complicated and used more widely, the distinctive line of people and machines is fading up. for example, we always follow the
schedule of flights made by computers; some of us have to starve when the oven refuses to function; the streamlines almost
drive the workers crazy without a thank you; and best of all, we are living under the threaten of weapons, especially nuclear
weapons. you may declare that these machines are still in the control of man, but they are not in the control of all mankind
this is where the rub is. if we can not command our machines, and even have to
either endure them or obey them, they are

certainly no tools at all. in that case, whether human kind is superior to machines is questionable.


after all these discussion, we can not conclude that human kind will always be superior to machines in a boarder view. but from personal aspect, I would rather hope this can always hold true. if we can really code with our machines, and do not abuse our creativity in virus or something, we deserve to be the forever master of machines.
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
158
注册时间
2010-7-12
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2010-7-22 03:08:10 |只看该作者
will human mind always be superior to machines? if judged on the foundation that the machines are and always will be only human's tools, this assertion is definitely true. adversely, a historical view or a reflection of the relationship between human and machine will challenge this saying.

machines, as they are defined, has long been the best servants of human race. from the ancient invention of bows to the newly emergence of cameras , we have benefited so much both physically and spiritually from them. thanks to creativity of human beings that we have bring out so many kinds of machines to facilitate and placate 为什么用这个词?ourselves. there is no doubt that we will step into the future with the accompany of our updated machines.


but when it comes to the future, nothing is predictable, so is the issue that whether machines will keep their loyalty and serve people while they are more intelligent and stronger than human race. the research of intelligent robots has made great breakthrough, and is most likely to keep being ranked as one of the hottest scientific field. the technology trends has inspired Asimov, one of the best scientific fantasy fiction是科幻小说吧 writers, to lay out the Three Laws of Robotics, in which the people's absolutely control of robot is required in case of machine's harm to mankind. in view of people's creativity, these laws are no jokes but serious moral principles of the researchers. after the computer controlled intelligent robots are successfully made, the circulation of virus can be the human's worst nightmare. in the movie of Matrixs, we have already seen the disaster of
rebelling machines. afterall, anything may happen in the future, so may之所以我觉得应该改成may,我觉得你的态度太坚定了,既然你这段的论据是科幻小说和电影,本身就带有主观色彩和个人臆想,所以立场应该是     提出一种可能性 something we do not want, like being the tools of our own machines.


moreover, we may already have been controlled by our machines in an unnoticeable way. as our machines are turning to be more complicated and used more widely, the distinctive line of people and machines is fading up. for example, we always follow the schedule of flights made by computers; some of us have to starve when the oven refuses to function; the streamlines almost drive the workers crazy without a thank you?不懂; 这个你认为最好的例子我认为你最好再考虑考虑 呵呵, weapon并不是公认的machine啊 对不?. you may declare that these machines are still in the control of man, but they are not in the control of all mankind我认为这点挺好的,你可以再延展延展,取决于你this is where the rub is. if we can not command our machines, and even have to either endure them or obey them, they are certainly no tools at all. in that case, whether human kind is superior to machines is questionable.

after all these discussion, we can not conclude that human kind will always be superior to machines in a boarder view. but from personal aspect, I would rather hope this can always hold true. if we can really code with our machines, and do not abuse our creativity in virus or something, we deserve to be the forever master of machines.

通篇文章语言一如既往的好,层次清晰,但是我觉得例子不够persuasive。
你的观点和我的完全对立,去看看我的吧
多拍拍

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
404
注册时间
2009-7-30
精华
0
帖子
19
板凳
发表于 2010-7-22 08:27:38 |只看该作者
改得很好,多谢;也许是我偏激了一些,观点有些耸人听闻吧,例子我觉得足够了,是我论证得不好,没讲清楚

使用道具 举报

RE: issue 159 by 吕男 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue 159 by 吕男
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1126434-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部