- 最后登录
- 2012-11-26
- 在线时间
- 29 小时
- 寄托币
- 64
- 声望
- 18
- 注册时间
- 2012-5-3
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 45
- UID
- 3305372
- 声望
- 18
- 寄托币
- 64
- 注册时间
- 2012-5-3
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
本帖最后由 okqishi 于 2012-5-7 22:51 编辑
4)Scandals are useful because they focusour attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Not any society can claim to be devoid of problems, and considerable effort has always been taken to cast light onproblems and solutions. Which is the better way to bring social problems topublic attention, as is the ever-heating debate, by revealing scandals or bythe propaganda of reformation and achievements? Such a question is to be leftopen in its nature, though from several perspectives scandals really have animpact on social concerns.
Just ask Google how many times a pieceof news had been clicked, and it is intuitive for us to get an impression that onetends to pay more attention to negative news while take the positivecounterpart for granted. Conspicuous and notorious as they usually are,scandals draw magnitudes of public attention at such a speed and in such ascale that few other events can match, and engage the society in defining andsolving the problem as a whole, taking manifold opinions into account. The Watergate Scandal raised attention from legislation, judicial and executive branches as well as civilians and the media, and the resolution of the political burglary lead to more reasonable political practices. After all theseyears this lesson remained fresh, while many other political propagandas,though once was spoken out aloud, have faded away.
Scandals’ striking nature is notnecessarily long-lasting. In fact, the pain in revealing a scandal can wear outas the practice repeats itself and makes the public apathetic. As was talk ofthe town in China two years ago, a so-called “anti-deceptionist” namedFangzhouzi disclosed that several celebrities had faked their academic diploma.The reveal caused society-wide incredulity in claimed academic success, andhopefully, some introspection in academic activities. However, as thedisclosure continued and more famous people were revealed of fallacies ---significant or negligible, the scandals themselves became trivia and the publicturned indifferent to them.
It is true that scandals are useful indrawing attention problems. Nevertheless, they are far from providing the cureto those problems, which can only be addressed by real introspection and reformation.Consider a society relying merely on scandals to reveal problems, with nomeasure being taken to settle any of them, and it is likely to infer that the society is at the edge of collapse, where the void of security or trust, infectious among the community, dampens the hope of its people and thus in turn hinders the effectiveness of any reformation. Although admittedly there is nopanacea for any social concern, speakers and reformers of certain kinds aredispensable to stand out, and to ensure efforts be made to get the issue out ofthe swamp, since revealing the problem is only the first step to get it solved.
In sum, scandals have the power in focusingpublic attention on social issues at a spanking rate and a considerable scale,but they are not the cure for those problems once and for always. |
|