寄托天下
查看: 1533|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[问答] 问一道阅读题, 36套 exe 14 [复制链接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
115
寄托币
1170
注册时间
2012-10-28
精华
0
帖子
401
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-8-9 14:35:00 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
One of the principal themes of Walzer's critique of liberal capitalism is that it is insufficiently egalitarian. Walzer's case against the economic inequality generated by
Line capitalism and in favor of "a radical redistribution of
5 wealth" is presented in a widely cited essay entitled "In Defense of Equality." The most striking feature of Walzer's critique is that, far from rejecting the principle of reward according to merit, Walzer insists on its validity. People who excel should receive the superior
10 benefits appropriate to their excellence. But people exhibit a great variety of qualities—"intelligence, physical strength, agility and grace, artistic creativity, mechanical skill, leadership, endurance, memory, psychological insight, the capacity for hard
15 work—even moral strength, sensitivity, the ability to express compassion."Each deserves its proper recompense, and hence a proper distribution of material goods should reflect human differences as measured on all these different scales. Yet, under capitalism, the ability
20 to make money ("the green thumb of bourgeois society") enables its possessor to acquire almost "every other sort of social good," such as the respect and esteem of others.

5.The passage provides sufficient information to
answer which of the following questions EXCEPT?
□A What weight in relation to other qualities
should a quality like sensitivity have,
according to Walzer, in determining the
proper distribution of goods?
□B Which quality does Walzer deem too highly
valued under liberal capitalism?
□C Which are the social goods that are, according
to Walzer, outside the reach of the power of
money?

这题怎么会选AC呢, 尚友的解释说B不选是因为最后一句话说到making money 就是B的highly valued. 但是最后一句话并没有被表明是Walzer的观点,看起来应该是作者的观点才对。
求解释,谢!!
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
314
寄托币
2405
注册时间
2010-10-27
精华
1
帖子
360

新任版主

沙发
发表于 2013-8-9 15:37:37 |只看该作者
这篇文章全文都是Walzer的观点,作者只是总结概括。
第二句话后面全部都是Walzer的Essay“In Defense of Equality”里的内容,最后一句点明了Walzer ”critique of liberal capitalism“的原因。
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
vngogher + 2 赞一个!

总评分: 声望 + 2   查看全部投币

使用道具 举报

RE: 问一道阅读题, 36套 exe 14 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
问一道阅读题, 36套 exe 14
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1621154-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部