问一道阅读题， 36套 exe 14

vngogherUID：3391684

One of the principal themes of Walzer's critique of liberal capitalism is that it is insufficiently egalitarian. Walzer's case against the economic inequality generated by
Line capitalism and in favor of "a radical redistribution of
5 wealth" is presented in a widely cited essay entitled "In Defense of Equality." The most striking feature of Walzer's critique is that, far from rejecting the principle of reward according to merit, Walzer insists on its validity. People who excel should receive the superior
10 benefits appropriate to their excellence. But people exhibit a great variety of qualities—"intelligence, physical strength, agility and grace, artistic creativity, mechanical skill, leadership, endurance, memory, psychological insight, the capacity for hard
15 work—even moral strength, sensitivity, the ability to express compassion."Each deserves its proper recompense, and hence a proper distribution of material goods should reflect human differences as measured on all these different scales. Yet, under capitalism, the ability
20 to make money ("the green thumb of bourgeois society") enables its possessor to acquire almost "every other sort of social good," such as the respect and esteem of others.

5.The passage provides sufficient information to
answer which of the following questions EXCEPT?
□A What weight in relation to other qualities
should a quality like sensitivity have,
according to Walzer, in determining the
proper distribution of goods?
□B Which quality does Walzer deem too highly
valued under liberal capitalism?
□C Which are the social goods that are, according
to Walzer, outside the reach of the power of
money?

这题怎么会选AC呢， 尚友的解释说B不选是因为最后一句话说到making money 就是B的highly valued. 但是最后一句话并没有被表明是Walzer的观点，看起来应该是作者的观点才对。
求解释，谢！！

alexl39UID：2940293

这篇文章全文都是Walzer的观点，作者只是总结概括。
第二句话后面全部都是Walzer的Essay“In Defense of Equality”里的内容，最后一句点明了Walzer ”critique of liberal capitalism“的原因。