- 最后登录
- 2010-12-22
- 在线时间
- 238 小时
- 寄托币
- 2157
- 声望
- 9
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-30
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 25
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1869
- UID
- 203387
- 声望
- 9
- 寄托币
- 2157
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-30
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 25
|
I totally agree with the speaker that facts are stubborn things. Facts exist as their own objectively(objectivity) but not because of we human beings' any attitudes or views on them. That is to say, our inclination, wishes or the dictates of our passions could not have any influence on the existing facts.
First of all, numerous big events had happened through the thousands of years' social development as time gone by. Since the time could not be reversed, we descendents could only taste these stories according to the corresponding records. While the history itself is objective, the records were the products of people's minds or observations which are subjective in essence. Nevertheless, the true history will be showed step by step along with the improvement of examination methods. For example, the Egypt ancient King Tut died at 16 while he had led a healthy and happy life before the death. Many inherited records in Egypt asserted that he was assassinated by the usurpers. However, the recent thorough CT examination of his excavated mummy found no evidence that he was murdered by others.个人感觉这个例子象是在说科技的原因才使事实重现,侧重点似乎偏了! (将上面的红字部分独立成句,或许好些!)In this way, history facts are unchangeable.
In modern times, as long the society is democratic, there is little way for any efforts trying to distort the facts since supervise of the verity of facts is much deep. This is especially true in the media industry. The news reporters in democratic societies try their best to expose the truth of events occurring recently so as to be outstanding and attract more readers which in turn accelerate the insurance of the truthfulness of facts. For example, the specific coverage of situation in Iraq including the suffering of ordinary citizens was showed to the world lively. True facts were exactly recorded. From this point of view, the facts could not be altered by people's inclination such as the government's wishes to hide these facts in order to get more civic supports.
On the other hand, the exchangeability(sorry,是unchangeability) of facts is even more evident in the modern scientific research since today's basic science research method is to develop theory to match the observed facts as much as possible.这句好长好绕口有点读不懂,能解释下吗? That is to say, facts or proved data are the only believable source of science. For example, firstly, most scientists agree that the electron,proton,neutron are the basic parts of all substances in the world. However, later more advanced and sophisticated experiment by professor Yang from China demonstrated that the basic parts mentioned above could be divided further into quark. Thus, we could only learn more about the facts through effective demonstration of facts but not our wishes.
Moreover, something could not be thought of觉得用dreamed up比较好(3x.又多学了一个!) at all with our temporary knowledge and or discovered by existing experiment methods but they indeed exist. I make this assertion because it is the fact that we human beings gradually learn more about the nature and ourselves by continuous discoveries of new facts which add to the maturation of our view about world. Therefore, it is sure这好象是病句吧?.... sure的主语是人吧,我也记不太清楚了(it is certain ) that there must be some new facts that have not been recognized. The example above could also demonstrate this point.
To sum up, facts are like the real scenes outside our house. We could only observe them through the window but could not change them. Whether we could record them objectively is decided by ourselves.结尾赞!
这个题目好抽象,实在是不好写~!!!你能把提纲列出来吗?觉得四段的逻辑性不是太强!句式不错,最强的是结尾!学习学习!
谢谢修改!受益匪浅!:handshake:)
sorry,应该一开始就列出提纲的。忘记了。下次一定改!
:)提纲:因为这是一道抽象类题目。而以往看得范文就是将抽象类题目具体化。即具体到某些特定的领域,因此偶也如此》
1。从历史事件的记录的角度来看!
2。从现代社会来看。并再次具体到媒体当中。
3。然后从科学研究的角度。
4。最后补充。对人类根本没有想到的facts也就无所谓歪曲与否了!
[ Last edited by hustzwj on 2005-7-28 at 19:46 ] |
|