Issue 17
There are two types of laws: just andunjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just lawsand, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.
结论 (先继承,后批判)
支持
反对不正义的法律
1.
总的来说,发对一切法律可以引起社会动荡,不利于治安,危害人身安全
2.
但是如果是因为某项法律引发了社会大动荡,必然是因为这项法律自身出现了问题,如有关限制黑人自由的法律。
3.
Further More精神层面上来说,如果不对感觉不公正的事物作出反应,久而久之人就会丧失思考能力,限于被动,成精神奴隶。
The speaker asserts that it is importantly for every resident in thesociety to disobey and resist unjust laws. In my view, disobey and resistunjust laws would disarrange society to certain degree that everyone isagitated, at least in short term. However, on balance, I agree with the speakerthat disobey unjust laws are our responsibilities. To begin with, I concede, in general, disobey any laws, just or unjustones, could bring society to chaos, if no more seriously. After all, disobeyinglaws which stand for the government's will could easily lead to anti-governmentactivities. Consider the famous May Storm Movement for instance. Students'dissatisfied with school's restricts about dormitories eventually result in aanti-social reform in the whole society. The chill effect is obviously: schoolswere closed, fight between students and cops were fierce, stores weredestroyed, economy was reducing. In fact, resistance rang form strike all theway up to wars would impede progress and harm innocent in the short term. However, in any democracy society, it is unfair and dangerous for thosewho think the laws are dubious to obey such laws. Laws which cause objectionwidespread mean the laws themselves are problematic or at least require furtherdiscussion. For examples on need look for abortion. If those who, mostChristian, consider abortion is against the law and convinced state to set upcertain laws to forbid such behavior, what would those feminist who insist thatwomen have the right to determine whether to terminate regency or not wouldthink about. It is unfair to them. So certain laws are indeed unjust in someaspect, at least to them. In the final analysis, the question whether resident should disobey unjustlaws arouse a more seriously worry. By stating the opposite, those people whoclaim we should obey every law, whether people feel just or unjust, areaccurately voting for monarchy. Just image this, without Martin Luther King,and black people are un-will stand out to resist certain unjust laws for thesociety's so-called responsibility, can we call the society nowadays which maystill require black people sitting in the back of bus, a democracy one. Ofcourse not, indeed, accept unjust laws without resist or with even think aboutthat would eventually turn our society backwards. In sum, though disobey unjust laws could bring certain problems and impedeprogress in the short term. I agree with the speaker that we should disobeyunjust laws for two reasons. One is that those laws which are considered unjustindeed are controversial and require further modification. Another is that suchbehavior could contribute to monarchy and harm every democracy society.
还有20天就要考了,现在还是不能限时成功,就这样的水平还写了2个钟头~~~~ 着急啊,555555~~
|